Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

3 Questions re Employment Tribunal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5551 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can anyone help with any of these three questions:

 

a) If an ex-employer has not paid most of the wages due in the most recent payroll cycle, but the employee is no longer employed there, is the 3-month deadline for submitting a claim to the employment tribunal considered to begin from the leaving date on the P45 or is it 3 months from the day of payment (ie even if payday was 2 weeks after the leaving date)?

 

and

 

b) If an employer does not accept any mail at the place of work and has said to send any mail to a different address (which apparently is the address of an associated company but not one that the employee was aware of or had any contact with), can a tribunal claim be made listing two different addresses for the respondent?

 

and

 

c) If the employer is not a corporation but rather a private partnership, can a tribunal claim list one of the individual partners as one of the respondents?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can anyone help with any of these three questions:

 

a) If an ex-employer has not paid most of the wages due in the most recent payroll cycle, but the employee is no longer employed there, is the 3-month deadline for submitting a claim to the employment tribunal considered to begin from the leaving date on the P45 or is it 3 months from the day of payment (ie even if payday was 2 weeks after the leaving date)?

 

your employer is obliged to pay anything owed to you in your final wage. if they have not, then this should also be brought up at the tribunal.

If however, you owe the company any money for anything, and they have a legitimate reason for keeping it, then they may deduct this from the final salary.

 

 

b) If an employer does not accept any mail at the place of work and has said to send any mail to a different address (which apparently is the address of an associated company but not one that the employee was aware of or had any contact with), can a tribunal claim be made listing two different addresses for the respondent?

 

there should be a single correspondance address, and any correspondance should be sent via recorded delivery to verfy that it has been recieved, with copies of all correspondance kept for later reference.

 

and

 

c) If the employer is not a corporation but rather a private partnership, can a tribunal claim list one of the individual partners as one of the respondents?

 

the claim should be against the company itself.

 

 

I think ll that is correct, if not someone else can fill in the blanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I know from experience that you have 3 months from the time you put your grievances letter either that be about wages owned or anything else your not happy with, as for place of where to send, make sure you get this right as I had this problem with one of my ex employers and he said he didn’t receive any paper work from the tribunal or my grievance letter I sent him, lucky for me I registered mailed it and kept the recite and checked up on royal mail when he picked up and singed for it and that alone won me my case or it would have been his word against mine and they would of thrown out my case. There is a guideline you have to stick with and ACAS are very helpful.

Not sure if this is any help and just going of my own experience but you do learn as you go alone which is a eye opener!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks but it's not 3 months from the grievance letter. Isn't it the case that the grievance letter might extend the deadline by three months, provided it was submitted within the original three month period, but the extension is from whenever the original deadline would be and not from the date of the greivance letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

In discrimination cases, you have 3 months from the date of incident within which to raise a grievance, or to submit ET1.

 

If you raise a grievance, you then cannot submit an ET1 within 28 days (this is to enable employer to investigate and determine your grievance), but must submit ET1 within 3 months from date of grievance. If you submit the ET within 28 days, the claim would be refused, but theres nothing to stop you submitting the same claim once this 28 period is over (so you dont lose anything by submitting before 28days are over).

 

Remember that even when done online, it takes several days for the claim to be registered and if theres any errors on your form, the claim would be rejected. So allow enough time for claim to be registered and correct anyn errors (so don't leave it to the last day!).

 

ET has discretion to extend time limits if it considers it to be 'just and equitable' to do so. Simply saying I did not know my legal rights is not a 'just and equitable' reason for extension. If you have a good reason (e.g. you did not find out about the act/omission until after the timelimits expired) ET may extend the time limit but they have to weigh it against the injustice that would be faced by the employer as a result of the delay. (Remember ET is trying to be fair to both parties).

 

All the advice I have seen points to the fact that this ET discretion to extend time limits should not be relied on.

 

 

 

Saying all that, I don't know if all the above applies in dismissal cases - I dont see why not, but better check first. Also I understand the statutory grievance procedure is changing soon and I'm not sure if the time limit issues also change.

 

Do a Google on "Employment Tribunal time limit" and also check out ETClaims.co.uk website for advice - thats how I found out much about employment law.

 

Good luck

I am not a lawyer, so all my advice is provided on the basis that you will check them with a trained legal professional with legal insurance.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...