Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long do bailiffs have to action a stress warrent?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi just been thinking after my last thread and need ask how long bailiffs can take action against a warrent before it is deemed out of time?

 

Im asking as after many attempts to pay a court fine by installments it still has not been resolved and so now bailiff have visited my home to collect money or goods.

 

The warrent was given out 9/8/2008.

 

I have been told it is 180 days and if this is correct does this refer to the date of when bailiff started taking action or for the total process to be completed, i.e money or goods recovered?

 

Many Thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the confirmation on that but it still has not really answered the question about wether it is from the date of issue or to total completion of warrent i.e all monies received.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Distress Warrant EXPIRE 180 days from the date on which it was issued.

 

This is provided for in the Contract between HMCS and the three bailiff companies contracted by them.

 

If the bailiff company refuse to accept payments then it is VITAL that you make a formal complaint about the actions of the bailiff company to the Magistrates Court that authorised the warrant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks tomtubby thats what I thought it was.

Another quick question is that the warrant was sent by court to marstons on 9/08/2008 now the baliffs are saying it was not put on there systems until 29/08/2008.

 

Please can you advise which date is used, the date it was sent from the court or the date baliffs documented the warrant on their systems?

 

Many thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh because I worked it out to be 4th feb, so expired about 2 weeks ago, would you mind just double checking the dates, maybe i made a mistake.

 

Even if they do insist on the day they logged it then it would of been 24th feb so still expired.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

....but they can re-issue the warrant.

 

'they' can't do it : a warrant is issued by the Court. So 'they' will have to apply for another one.

 

An interesting point - possibly for TT : if they haven't exercised the warrant before it expired then will the Court take a dim view of this?

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a bailiff visit me already to collect on 18th February but I had come out of hospital the day before from an op so they went away and said they would be back on 4th March. I called the court and got them to confirm the warrant date and then contacted the bailiff, I advised him of this and he said he would have to look into it and I would either hear from him or the court in due course.

 

Might sound strange but I do actually want the warrant returned to court as I have an agreement with them that if it is, they will inform me and allow me to pay the fine without any further consequences or charges.

 

Please advise on what will probably happen in this situation?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court can re issue a Warrant.

 

However when the warrant is returned to the court it reverts back to the original amount. The bailiff fees are NOT included so you may then make arrangments with the Magistrates Court direct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...