Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How Long Does The Dvla Hold Your Motoring Offence Records?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4851 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Insofar as the DVLA systems are capable of holding any data securely:eek:, they hold it for ever.

 

..and when they no longer hold it, they have probably given it out to every Tom Dick or Harry so you can get it from there. Failing that, search the nearest roundabout, as being a government body, they have more than likely lost a disk on it some time recently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone for your comments inc the funny ones...and yeah they do never receive our letters.....they still think my car is not taxed even thou I have sent proof in twice lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on th offence, speeding offences,no insurance etc will drop off after 4 years.

 

No. That's when they can be taken off your licence and that wasn't the OP's question.

 

The question was "How long do the DVLA hold the record?" and the answer is forever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone I got my answer through the freedom of information act this is what the dvla said...........

 

Thank you for your e-mail of 25 February asking for information under

the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. The information you

require is freely available and this is being answered as "Business as

usual."

 

Endorsements remain on a driving licence (and DVLA's computer records)

for:

 

11 years from the date of conviction for offences relating to

drink/drugs and driving, causing death by careless driving whilst uinder

the influence of drink/drugs and causing death by careless driving then

failing to provide a specimen for analysis.

 

4 years from date of conviction for reckless/dangerous driving and

offences resulting in disqualification.

 

4 years from the date of offence in all other cases.

 

After this time, the spent endorsements are deleted from DVLA's

computer records. DVLA does not hold any manual paper records of

motoring offences.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Cheryl James

Drivers Customer Support

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont you have to write in to them to actually get it removed? otherwise it just stays on??

 

only in so far as the points are physically on your paper part of your license. If you don't send it back after 4 years then they will be visible on your license for as long as you keep it, although they will be invalid points.

 

Of course, if you send your license back to have them removed, they are not actually removed from your license, they are simply producing a new license for you from their current database, which ties in with their official response that these points were deleted from their files and therfore aren't printed on the new license.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I simply don't believe their official response I'm afraid.

 

Trying taking a motoring offence as far as Court. When the matter of sentencing arises, the Magistrates have a printout of your entire motoring offence history since the year dot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone I got my answer through the freedom of information act this is what the dvla said...........

After this time, the spent endorsements are deleted from DVLA's

computer records. DVLA does not hold any manual paper records of

motoring offences.

Cheryl James

Drivers Customer Support

 

Could it be the 'record' is maintained elsewhere than with the DVLA?

say, a Court or Records office?

 

Could S8NDS respond to the DVLA with what PatDavis says and ask for their comment in view of the apparently conflicting information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could it be the 'record' is maintained elsewhere than with the DVLA?

say, a Court or Records office?

Could S8NDS respond to the DVLA with what PatDavis says and ask for their comment in view of the apparently conflicting information?

 

Yeah no worries I will ask them that...............get back to you guys soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also this particular speeding offence was committed in wales.....if I needed the information from the magistrates court there who would I contact as I am unaware of where the license was originally sent? It was a apaper license and its been lost so cant even check the license? Plus there is nothing on the DVLA computer system as it happened 4.5 years ago.

 

Thanks

Edited by S8NDS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone I know had endorsements on this licence from 1972, 1980 and 5 years ago had to appear in court with his paper licence, which was issued in 1977.

On production of the licence, the Mags. Clerk told the Magistrates that both endorsements were spent, and should treat my mate's licence as clean.

This duly happened, and no notice was taken of the old spent endorsements when considering the case on trial at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
I simply don't believe their official response I'm afraid.

 

Trying taking a motoring offence as far as Court. When the matter of sentencing arises, the Magistrates have a printout of your entire motoring offence history since the year dot.

 

Not sure if this is going to be any help but my experience of this is that when I was 17 in 1979 I was banned from driving for 12 months as I failed a breath test as I was one point over the limit. - Very young and stupid and learned a big lesson.

 

in 1991 I got caught speeding and had to go to the magistrates court. I was very worried because at that time I needed my car for my job and thought that because my licence showed that I had already been banned once before that this would go against me. Also because of the speed I had been travelling I could have been automatically banned too.

 

In the court the judge asked the clerk of the court if I had any penalty points on the licence and the clerk replied that the licence had no penalty points and was clean.

 

I am sure that the court representitive would have seen that my licence showed the ban but as more than 11 years had passed it was obviously a spent conviction.

 

Because of the circumstances surrounding the reason why I was driving so fast the court had discretion and I didnt lose my licence - had 6 points added and a fine.

 

I had to surrender my licence to the court and when it came back from DVLA the original conviction from 1979 had been removed.

 

When it became a requirement to have a photo ID driving licence I applied for a new one and when it came the 6 points from 1991 also have been removed too.

 

So my experience is that if the time has lapsed even if the conviction still shows on the licence it does not go against you in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

If the DVLA was holding on to details of long expired endorsements then they could come into conflict with the Information Commissioner as holding on to such information would be a breach of the Data Protection Act. Information has to be relevant and topical/timely and I doubt DVLA would be able to argue that having information relating to a long expired endorsement would be compliant.

 

As for the courts getting print outs from DVLA. the print outs only show endorsements that are current. They do not show expired endorsements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...