Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dwf have contacted me by telephone  I haven’t confirmed anything 
    • Now received a pack from Barclays Marked " Personal Data Request" and "Start of Right of Access Response" It was sent by their General data protection Team and includes details for a loan account and a credit card. The loan details includes a copy of a signed Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, signed by me and dated 2/9/2004. It refers to Terms and conditions overleaf, but copies of these were not included in the package just received. The Original Loan expiry date was September 2009. Barclaycard: Their records indicate Last Billed 15/03/2024 (not rcvd. by me) Last date account in order and not delinquent 15/03/2024. Date account closed 31/12/9999 (!), They show "Account not in Collections" and last payment posted 16/04/2007(!) also Last Payment Recorded as 02/10/2023. In their memo Details section: Section 78 Outcome "unenforceable" recorded on 12/10/2023. As stated in this thread, I had been paying off both the loan and card. I had stopped paying the card but am still paying the loan's nominal monthly payments.  
    • SMEs operating in “undesirable” sectors targeted by debankingView the full article
    • How did the UK exit recession?View the full article
    • Massive apologies. That makes absolute sense, and I should have considered that first. I am sorry. I had wanted to provide a copy of the case file which I had sent to myjar. I am really sorry. I understand your point, the issue I have is that because I suffer from bipolar I took out a load of payday loans, I tried going through resolver and asked that they consider writing off the loan this was in 2020. I had previously changed my name, and Myjar responded to me in my new name. The change was both my first name and second name. The document I sent listed the information there. Despite this, every communication I have received from them has been in my former names. I requested they read the first page of the document, which literally listed my details and answers to their questions. They refused to do so, so I told them to go ahead and bring me to court. Interestingly they have now contacted me about another loan with a separate company which is unrelated to this but uses the information that I supplied in the case file. Given that they would not act upon the information supplied in the case file, would this stand in a court of law (in which case the debt is not statute barred)? If this information, which they would not act on, is not relevant, then it would be. They also called me for the first time yesterday under my newer number and old name. They asked if I knew anyone who called (my former name). I said no and put the phone down. I had previously gone to (The financial ombudsman) but been told that due to Myjar failing they could not help. I'm not sure where I stand, I'm sorry for rambling and for not thinking in the first place.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Offering reduced payments... Thoughts pls...


CaptainBob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5566 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I sent all of my creditors a copy of my SOA following a change in personal circumstances (namely I'm on a lot less £'s now than I was last month as my last firm folded, and I had to find work very quickly to cover household essentials and the mortgage). The SOA clearly shows I have a fairly small amount of disposable income after the mortgage and household bills, to distribute amongst my 11 creditors, all of whom are owed a fair bit. The cover letter I put with the SOA was a slightly modified template from this site, and the explanation I put was simply that my salary is a lot lower than it previously used to be, but that I was still working.

 

M&S Money have responded and have asked me to "clarify why, and by how much your income has been reduced, and provide proof"

 

Now this is fair enough for them to ask, but as I was typing a reply, I started thinking how blunt this was, given that I have had to admit I have major issues and ask them for some help (having never ever missed a payment).

 

Just wondered what anyone else would think - especially given that my SOA from Natonal Debt Line clearly shows my situation. (i have nothing to hide, and can supply the "proof", but just felt like it was kicking someone when they're down).

 

Rant over ;-)

"What you see depends on what you are looking for"

Link to post
Share on other sites

clarify why, and by how much your income has been reduced
Well if they had read your statement of affairs they would see how much your income has fallen to.

 

and provide proof
There is absolutely no requirement for you to do this.

 

What type of account is this and when was it taken out?

 

Are there any charges on the account?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a persoanl unsecured loan account taken out in 2005. So far no charges, but they are saying that before they accept my offer of reduced payment, they want to see this "proof". It just really got under my skin as I already feel embarrassed about my situation, having had to take the first job that came along to keep a roof over our head and food on the table for the missus and me 2 youngsters, and fill out the SOA, which on the first draft clearly showed where obvious things could be cut back (and they were - sky tv chopped, broadband changed to cheaper provider, strict food budget in place, car sold and replaced with cheap 1.4 engine economical one, etc). I was being proactive by sending them all of this well before their next payment is due, rather than miss payments and then have extra charges and arrears. Surprisingly, they never wanted to see "proof" of my income when the loan was taken out.... Just made me feel like I was trying to cheat them. Believe me, I wish my current situation was make believe, but sadly it's true and it isn't particularly pleasant at the moment...

"What you see depends on what you are looking for"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had similar problems with some of my creditors. I sent them all details of my financial incomings and outgoing yet they still ask for details, or have ignored my letter and keep ringing me, or ask me to pay a minimum of at least £10 that I cannot afford. Can they force me to pay £10 a month even though I have told them I cannot afford it, and am I within my rights to just pay a couple of pounds per month? Surely something is better than nothing!

The man of my dreams is where he wants to be. If he wanted me, he'd be here ... :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most companies want you to pay more than you can afford. If you have provided and income and exp and made a proposal of each amount then there's nothing more than you can do. You do not need to provide any proof.

 

I always advise what you have done and then adjust your payments as you have advised them and keep to them. Most companies will ask for more but ignore them. Courts take a very dim view of companies that try and squeeze more out of you than you can afford and if it has been shown you have paid these amounts then there nothing they can really do as a court will not force you to pay more than you can afford.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a company does not accept your offer (no matter how low it is) then I would send them something along the following lines.

 

Dear Sirs,

 

RE: Account Number: xxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxxx, in respect of the above matter.

 

I am disappointed to note that you will not consider my proposal to satisfy my debt to you. I appreciate that this is not a wholly satisfactory state of affair, but this is the reality of my situation at the present time.

 

I would point out that I have investigated the options of an Individual Voluntary Arrangement and Bankruptcy but I feel that my proposal is certainly more beneficial to you than either of these procedures. Due to my present circumstances, I am unable to offer a better resolution and would respectfully ask that you reconsider my proposal, which was submitted in a genuine attempt to honour my commitment to you.

 

I further appreciate that you are not obliged to accept my proposal, however, considering that you are entitled to issue proceedings for the recovery of the balance owed to you, I would ask that you also consider, that in the event that these proceedings ensue, interest would be frozen upon Judgement and I would entirely reserve the right to produce my proposal for the attention of the Court, in evidence that I have attempted a sensible resolution in line with my ability to pay.

 

This notwithstanding, I would hope that the foregoing will not be necessary and that we will be able to resolve this matter amicably.

 

In the interim, I will forward payments to you as proposed, as a gesture of good faith. Please could you conduct any further communication in writing only.

Accordingly, I await your further comments.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Remember these are non priority debts. They may huff and puff but at the end of the day if you are paying them in line with your ability to pay then they are obliged to accept this. You just need to stick to your guns and insist that this is all I can afford to pay you at present.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All - I am starting to get more replies in now. Getting the "you must phone us" letters, but a couple are insisting that they will only consider the reduced payment if it comes via PayPlan, CCCS or other debt management plan. Is this normal? Whats the difference between doing it myself and going through one of these to arrange it? I have seen good things about PayPlan and CCCS on here, so have no reservations about them, I just wondered if anyone else has had this type of reply, but been able to go directly to the creditors instead? Cheers

"What you see depends on what you are looking for"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had exactly what you describe when my situation went pear shaped due to a serious change in circumstances and unavoidable expense. I went with PP in the end, it was surprisingly easy. It's something you may wish to consider, even if for a probationary period. The downside is usually an adverse credit rating, the upside is frozen charges/interest (usually). Some compaines charge for this service but CCCS and PP are both free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get replies to my letters (yet!!) just phone calls 3 or 4 times a day! I don't answer them because I think talking to them, they try and make you pay more than you can afford by saying 'Oh we cannot accept that amount, the lowest we can accept is £xx' I have already given them a full breakdown of my income & outgoings, plus I have made token payments, so why do they keep ringing? Isn't it harrassment when they keep calling like that? Some of my calls have started at 8.20am and finally given up at 9pm. I just turn my ringer off now!! :confused:

The man of my dreams is where he wants to be. If he wanted me, he'd be here ... :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...