Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Offering reduced payments... Thoughts pls...


CaptainBob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I sent all of my creditors a copy of my SOA following a change in personal circumstances (namely I'm on a lot less £'s now than I was last month as my last firm folded, and I had to find work very quickly to cover household essentials and the mortgage). The SOA clearly shows I have a fairly small amount of disposable income after the mortgage and household bills, to distribute amongst my 11 creditors, all of whom are owed a fair bit. The cover letter I put with the SOA was a slightly modified template from this site, and the explanation I put was simply that my salary is a lot lower than it previously used to be, but that I was still working.

 

M&S Money have responded and have asked me to "clarify why, and by how much your income has been reduced, and provide proof"

 

Now this is fair enough for them to ask, but as I was typing a reply, I started thinking how blunt this was, given that I have had to admit I have major issues and ask them for some help (having never ever missed a payment).

 

Just wondered what anyone else would think - especially given that my SOA from Natonal Debt Line clearly shows my situation. (i have nothing to hide, and can supply the "proof", but just felt like it was kicking someone when they're down).

 

Rant over ;-)

"What you see depends on what you are looking for"

Link to post
Share on other sites

clarify why, and by how much your income has been reduced
Well if they had read your statement of affairs they would see how much your income has fallen to.

 

and provide proof
There is absolutely no requirement for you to do this.

 

What type of account is this and when was it taken out?

 

Are there any charges on the account?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a persoanl unsecured loan account taken out in 2005. So far no charges, but they are saying that before they accept my offer of reduced payment, they want to see this "proof". It just really got under my skin as I already feel embarrassed about my situation, having had to take the first job that came along to keep a roof over our head and food on the table for the missus and me 2 youngsters, and fill out the SOA, which on the first draft clearly showed where obvious things could be cut back (and they were - sky tv chopped, broadband changed to cheaper provider, strict food budget in place, car sold and replaced with cheap 1.4 engine economical one, etc). I was being proactive by sending them all of this well before their next payment is due, rather than miss payments and then have extra charges and arrears. Surprisingly, they never wanted to see "proof" of my income when the loan was taken out.... Just made me feel like I was trying to cheat them. Believe me, I wish my current situation was make believe, but sadly it's true and it isn't particularly pleasant at the moment...

"What you see depends on what you are looking for"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had similar problems with some of my creditors. I sent them all details of my financial incomings and outgoing yet they still ask for details, or have ignored my letter and keep ringing me, or ask me to pay a minimum of at least £10 that I cannot afford. Can they force me to pay £10 a month even though I have told them I cannot afford it, and am I within my rights to just pay a couple of pounds per month? Surely something is better than nothing!

The man of my dreams is where he wants to be. If he wanted me, he'd be here ... :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most companies want you to pay more than you can afford. If you have provided and income and exp and made a proposal of each amount then there's nothing more than you can do. You do not need to provide any proof.

 

I always advise what you have done and then adjust your payments as you have advised them and keep to them. Most companies will ask for more but ignore them. Courts take a very dim view of companies that try and squeeze more out of you than you can afford and if it has been shown you have paid these amounts then there nothing they can really do as a court will not force you to pay more than you can afford.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a company does not accept your offer (no matter how low it is) then I would send them something along the following lines.

 

Dear Sirs,

 

RE: Account Number: xxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxxx, in respect of the above matter.

 

I am disappointed to note that you will not consider my proposal to satisfy my debt to you. I appreciate that this is not a wholly satisfactory state of affair, but this is the reality of my situation at the present time.

 

I would point out that I have investigated the options of an Individual Voluntary Arrangement and Bankruptcy but I feel that my proposal is certainly more beneficial to you than either of these procedures. Due to my present circumstances, I am unable to offer a better resolution and would respectfully ask that you reconsider my proposal, which was submitted in a genuine attempt to honour my commitment to you.

 

I further appreciate that you are not obliged to accept my proposal, however, considering that you are entitled to issue proceedings for the recovery of the balance owed to you, I would ask that you also consider, that in the event that these proceedings ensue, interest would be frozen upon Judgement and I would entirely reserve the right to produce my proposal for the attention of the Court, in evidence that I have attempted a sensible resolution in line with my ability to pay.

 

This notwithstanding, I would hope that the foregoing will not be necessary and that we will be able to resolve this matter amicably.

 

In the interim, I will forward payments to you as proposed, as a gesture of good faith. Please could you conduct any further communication in writing only.

Accordingly, I await your further comments.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Remember these are non priority debts. They may huff and puff but at the end of the day if you are paying them in line with your ability to pay then they are obliged to accept this. You just need to stick to your guns and insist that this is all I can afford to pay you at present.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All - I am starting to get more replies in now. Getting the "you must phone us" letters, but a couple are insisting that they will only consider the reduced payment if it comes via PayPlan, CCCS or other debt management plan. Is this normal? Whats the difference between doing it myself and going through one of these to arrange it? I have seen good things about PayPlan and CCCS on here, so have no reservations about them, I just wondered if anyone else has had this type of reply, but been able to go directly to the creditors instead? Cheers

"What you see depends on what you are looking for"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had exactly what you describe when my situation went pear shaped due to a serious change in circumstances and unavoidable expense. I went with PP in the end, it was surprisingly easy. It's something you may wish to consider, even if for a probationary period. The downside is usually an adverse credit rating, the upside is frozen charges/interest (usually). Some compaines charge for this service but CCCS and PP are both free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get replies to my letters (yet!!) just phone calls 3 or 4 times a day! I don't answer them because I think talking to them, they try and make you pay more than you can afford by saying 'Oh we cannot accept that amount, the lowest we can accept is £xx' I have already given them a full breakdown of my income & outgoings, plus I have made token payments, so why do they keep ringing? Isn't it harrassment when they keep calling like that? Some of my calls have started at 8.20am and finally given up at 9pm. I just turn my ringer off now!! :confused:

The man of my dreams is where he wants to be. If he wanted me, he'd be here ... :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...