Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Blemain Agreement Has gaps not filled in!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5510 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We took out a 2nd charge on our home with Blemain Finance in Dec 2007 through Freedom finance on the assumption that we would only need it for 6 months, then we would pay it off (along with the 12K early repayment fees!) and not worry any more.

 

We needed the money for a building development that was meant to get us out of financial difficulty!

 

We had no other way of raising the money and thought it was our only way out.

 

When the time came we were unable to repay after 6 months and our development was complete but we were unable to sell we had no choice but continue the monthly payments (12.1%pa).

 

Seven months on and we are in severe financial difficulty. Mainly because we cannot remortgage the development.

 

Trying to work out exactly where we stand we have been trying to understand all the very small print in our agreement. I know we should have taken more notice before signing it....!

 

Having read (but not understood) all the small print I am amazed they are allowed to force such incredibly tough conditions! I certainly didn't realise they could change the rates whenever they feel like it with just 7 days notice.

 

Also having read these terms and conditions there are a couple of things that have come to my attention:-

 

They do not quote a title number.

 

There is a clause in the schedule that has a blank space that should have been filled in.

 

Do I have some come back on this agreement?

 

Any advice would gratefully received.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's in the Schedule under Mortgage conditions

No 5. In any case where the Property consists of registered land the Mortgagor agrees that the Lender may apply for a restriction to be entered on the Proprietorship Register in the following terms:

*no disposition of the registered estate by the propritor of the registered estate is to be registered without a written consent signed by the proprietor for the time being of the charge dated in favour of the Lender referred to in the charges register (or, if appropriate, signed on such propritor's behalf by an officer or its solicitor)" and to the extent that the Lenders security shall fail to take effect by way of Legal charge it shall take effect as an equitable charge, in which case;

(1) By signing this agreement the Borrower agrees to the registration of an agreed notice for the purposes of protecting the Lenders interest and to an entry in form N of schedule 4 of the land registration rules 2003 ans

(2) The borrower authorises the Lender to sign any application for the registration of an agreed notice on behalf of the borrower.

 

I hope that is what you mean!

 

I truly have no idea what it is talking about!!

 

(I must have been out of my mind to sign this!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

SORRY!!

 

Just re read my post they spaces I put in to show where the gap was obviously wasn't enough to show on my post!

 

The gap is where it says

 

"being of the charge dated in favour of the Lender referred to in the charges register"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi frettful38

 

Does your agreement also say they can change the interest as and when they choose with just 7 days notice?

 

When we took this out Blemain insisted we see a solicitor to have them explain the terms to us. Which we did and the only thing the solicitor really came up with is if you have an insurance claim any money you get from the insurance you must give to Blemain (which I thought was bizarre but not terribly important!). He didn't seem to notice the blank space (or didn't care about it!).

 

Because we thought it was just for 6 months we weren't too concerned but now it's been more than a year (and we have read through the terms properly!) we are very concerned about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we all made mistakes somewhere along the line not knowing what consequences lied ahead, but we are not the only ones to blame. These companies have a major hand in turning the world upside down. If we try to challenge any of these clauses or any other part of our agreements no doubtedly they will be well prepared to defend, then again you never know maybe something good may come out of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to the current buy to let mortgage conditions we are in serious financial difficulties and having read Blemains terms and conditions it says they may repossess as soon as we come to an arrangement with anyone we owe money to!

 

This and many other concerns has stopped me sleeping at night for the last three months!

 

My health and my family are at serious risk and at this point I have no choice but to do anything I can to secure our home.

 

Advice would be truly appreciated as I can not afford time pursuing this if I have no chance of success.

 

Many thanks

Edited by esile172
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry to hear how badly this is effecting you and hope someone with better knowledge will come along and advise you better.

Is it not worth you going to the citizen advice to see if they may be able to help or point you in the right direction.

 

Keep searching and finding out as much as information as you can. And please don't worry to the extent that it effects your health. I know its easier said than done, but from my own personnel experience if you worry too much it can cloud your sense of judgment, and this makes it harder for you to find the best help. Keep strong and have faith, and don't give up. You are not the only one in such a state, have a look at my threads :eek:

 

I wish you the best of luck and remember there is always a way out of everything its just a matter of finding out how :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Don't know if this is of any help.

 

I think if you go to cab you can get half hour free with a solicitor. If you explain you need to see one that specialises in contract law they may be able to put you in touch with one.

 

Also if you have legal cover on your house insurance you may be able to use that.

 

The firm Stephensons halp with mortgages as well I think, it may be worth looking at their website. I think they do no win no fee

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should contact someone to have a look at the agreement.Midge61 suggested a firm Stephensons that help with mortgages & loans. If you type their name in to google you can have a look at their site and what they do. I have had a look today myself and find them quite interesting.

 

Have a look and see what they say

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is their website.

 

Overview - Contract, Consumer & Housing Disputes - Stephensons Solicitors (Leigh, Wigan, Manchester, Bolton, St Helens) - Family, Commercial Law, Conveyancing

 

 

This is where their offices are based, when you go on their website it will say contact us then you can find out, Good luck and keep posted with what happens,

 

rule_left_col.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be contacting them tomorrow.

 

Having just read through my contract for the third time I am starting to understand it a little more.

 

The date that had not been filled in is in the schedule which is classed as page 4 of 5 of the entire agreement.

 

Also....!

 

Am I right in saying (from something I have read this weekend!) that they must allow you 14 days to change your mind? If so is this before the money is released? Because my terms and conditions state

 

21. The borrower has no right of cancellation under the C C Act 1974, the timeshare Act 1992 or the financial Services (Distance Marketing) Regulations 2004.

 

I might be confused with something else but...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would love to say yes but as you I am just as lost and confused on this matter. I too have also contacted them. Lets hope we both get to hear good news. If I get any news in the meantime I will let you know.

 

See you were panicking so much yesterday and today you probably feel a bit relieved that you have made a good start in the right direction, keep posted and I will too if I hear anything,

 

 

Good luck and take care,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...