Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • He was one of four former top executives from Sam Bankman-Fried's firms to plead guilty to charges.View the full article
    • The private submersible industry was shaken after the implosion of the OceanGate Titan sub last year.View the full article
    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CL Finance - Court defence by 2nd Feb HELP!!


Stevel1959
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I’m hoping that someone can help me please. I am helping a friend of mine who suffers from ME/CFS and is finding this very difficult to cope with. I have offered to help but am struggling with what to do next. She received a court claim form that was instigated by CL Finance. We asked for a 14 extension to the court which was granted and this runs out very shortly.

 

We sent off a CPR 18 to CL Finance and received the usual reply from Howard Cohen stating that they “we are not obliged to provide us with the information and the particulars of the claim on the Count Court claim form should be sufficient to allow you to respond accordingly”.

 

I understand from reading the threads we should be putting in a ‘holding’ defence. We are not sure what this is and what to say. Please can someone help as the defence has to be in by 2nd Feb. We know this is short notice but my friend was dealing with things but has got overwhelmed and is now quite poorly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you need to tell a little bit about the particulars of claim ( without identifying too much about yourself) eg is it "credit agreement with xxxx, assigned to yyyy... deafult notice issued zzz claiming amount aaa", or something different.?

 

General holding defence would be "neither admit nor deny, frustrated in pleading..". etc (see other posts, such as CreditCardMug's excellent thread).

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/152183-barclaycard-lewis-cl-finance-1.html

 

Whatever you put in defence, nothing happens until the next stage (AQ) when each side has to state what they are asking the court to do next. As long as you put in any defence now, it automatically moves to the next step - either gets stayed (put on hold) or CL/Cohen pay more to go to AQ stage. At that point, you canthen state that without the further info you can't enter a detailed defence, and you thus request the court to order the Claimant to provide the info you already asked for in the CPR.

 

 

 

I am currently at AQ stage with this mob

 

I'm sure others other have more detailed help, this is just to get you going & provide support / direction.

 

Good luck. Don't give in to this bunch of chancers blasting out garbage through Northampton.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your reply. It was a credit agreement with Barclaycard Mastercard which was initially passed to Mercer's - they issued the Default Notice of £3XXX. She then received a letter from Lewis Debt Recovery who said they were acting on behalf of their clients, CL Lewis, with a small box giving a notice of assignment. 10 days after this (New Years eve) letter the court claim arrived.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more question. My friend, with my help, sent a CPR 18 (Request for Information) which prompted the reply stated above from Lewis Debt Recovery. The letter was dated and sent recorded delivery. It also stated that we required the information in 14 days, however we did not include the date that we required the information by - does this render her CPR 18 invalid?

 

Thank you for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Please can you type up, or scan and post, the Particulars of Claim you've received from the court. Don't post personal details and be vaguish with the amounts.

 

Was the claim issued from Northampton or another court ?

 

If from another court, were there any documents attached ?

 

Also, as VG has suggested, could you scan & post the Default Notice you've received from Mercers.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Everyone,

 

Thanks for all your help. Am attaching the scans now( from ChasedbyAgencies)

 

PLEASE NOTE will be posting in future from Chasedby Agencies - this is the account of my friend. I am at work and ChasedbyAgencies will be posting the scans shortly. to save confusion all further posts will be from ChasedbyAgencies. Hope no-one is now confused!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All, Just wanted to say thanks for all the advice so far, it really is appreciated. I am the lady concerned and we will now just post under my user ID,

 

The Court claim from was from Northampton (CCBC) and no documentation other than the admisison, defence and counterclaim forms was atttached to the court papers. Have scans below of Default Notice and the POC. First time I have posted here, so hope they come out ok. If you need to know anything else, just ask away.

Scan Defaultnotice0001.PDF

Courtclaim0001.PDF

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default notice is a joke....

 

i quote the following from Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561)

 

 

Quote:

SCHEDULE 2

FORM OF DEFAULT NOTICE BEFORE A CREDITOR OR OWNER CAN BECOME ENTITLED, BY REASON OF ANY BREACH BY THE

DEBTOR OR HIRER OF A REGULATED AGREEEMENT, TO TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT, DEMAND EARLIER PAYMENT OF ANY

SUM, RECOVER POSSESSION OF ANY GOODS OR LAND, TREAT ANY RIGHT CONFERRED ON THE DEBTOR OR HIRER BY THE

AGREEMENT AS TERMINATED, RESTRICTED OR DEFERRED OR ENFORCE ANY SECURITY

Regulation 2(2)

Details of agreement

 

1

A description of the agreement sufficient to identify it.

 

Parties to agreement

2

(1) The name and a postal address of the creditor or owner.

(2) The name and postal address of the debtor or hirer.

 

Details of breach of agreement and action required to remedy, or pay compensation for, the breach

3

A specification of:--

(a) the provision of the agreement alleged to have been breached; and

(b) the nature of the alleged breach of the agreement, specifying clearly the matters complained of; and either

© if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date, being a date [not less than

fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which that action is to be taken; or

(d) if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach and

the date, being a date [not less than fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which it is to be paid.

 

 

As for your defence, have a look here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/144007-help-amex-no-cca-3.html#post1549360

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello 42Man, Thank you for the info and the links, very useful and interesting reading. There is a lot of legal issues/technicalities to go through and understand and I have to admit that I am struggling to know which bits to include, as I think I need to look up the different laws and statutes. Am off for a bit to do some serious reading and note-taking as am finding this hard to understand. Now before you write me off as a nimpomcoup, part of my condition with ME is that I suffer from mental confusion/fatigue which is how I came to be in such a mess. Assimilating information is not very easy for me, and I have to do it in small bytes :-)

 

Thanks Goodness for people like you, pointing me in the right direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about asking questions or being judged by others - it just doesn't happen here on this forum.

 

42man has given you excellent threads to read, which should cover most of what you need to know.

 

Finally - Don't be afraid of asking about something you don't understand.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, can you say what date is on the Default Notice, and what date it gives you to remedy by?

 

Also, is there a page two to it, and can you post that up?

 

As Supa says ask Anything you need, no-one judges anyone one here, were all friends in the same boat.

 

Regards

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCM, hope you dont mind, is it OK to use some of your defence? Have been reading your thread as well as others, and think I need to use bits here and there, although still fuzzy about what :-)

 

Default Notice was sent by Mercers on 26 June 2008 asking for a payment of £XXX.00 before 13 July 2008. However it is CL Finance that have done the Court Claim! 2nd page of Cr**py Default Notice below. Not sure at mo how much of legal stuff to include on default notice in defence - hopefully will become clearer the more I read.

 

Did you get judgment against yours in the end, or still waiting?

 

Thank you

DefaultnoticeP20001.PDF

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am acting on behalf of a friend of mine who was slapped with a court claim by CL Finance on New Year’s Eve just gone. We are preparing her defence and would like to submit a counter-claim. She suffers from CFS / ME and this caused her to become unemployed and this obviously cut her income drastically. This had the effect of my friend falling behind on the payments on her Barclaycard MasterCard bill. After several phone calls from Barclays Bank the account was then passed to Mercer’s who bombarded my friend with countless phone calls - up to 10 daily. She stated to them every time they rang that she suffered from ME / CFS all to no avail. This eventually led to my friend having her worst ever relapse. I would like to ask some questions;

 

1. In her holding defence can she mention that she wants to put in a counter-claim for harassment?

2. I read in a case that someone wanted to reclaim late payment fees – do we mention this at this stage?

3. Is there a connection between Mercers, Lewis Debt Recovery and CL Finance?

 

Thank you for your help in advance.

Edited by Stevel1959
Update
Link to post
Share on other sites

The DN hasn't been done in the prescribed form, so is invalid, no problem using defences found on here.

Yes reading as much as you can is the best advice.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cany anyone help with this question? I am just about to claim back charges with Barclaycard, and read somewhere here, that if you are claiming back charges you need to put it in the defence. However as it is CL Finance taking me to Court, am not sure whether I should be doing a Counter Claim for my defence. Can anyone please help clarify this for me and what to do?

 

Still in process of compiling my defence and hope to get it up tomorrow, for some kindly person to check it for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you please post the Particulars Of Claim.

 

Also if you could let us know when roughly the account was opened and any information/documents that she has requested from CL Finance (or if indeed she has done so) to support her counter claim/defence.

 

Did she receive a Notice of Assignment when the account was transferred to CL Finance?

 

Did she receive a default notice?

 

Did CL Finance send her a Letter Before Action informing her that legal proceedings were about to be commenced against her?

 

What sort of percentage of the balance claimed does she think is made up of charges e.g. late payment fees, overlimit fees?

 

Have CL Finance applied any charges to the account?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this lot seem to be making everyone miserable at the moment. common trend is Barclaycard pass to mercers and then out of the blue CL finance, however in my experience i have never even been contacted by them, only their dodgy solicitors Cohen's, who just instigate legal proceedings without any sort of protocol at all!!

 

keep an eye out on here, loads in the same happy boat!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, Well this has certainly been a crash course over hte last few days with very little sleep. this is what I have put together, have kept it quite short as due to time pressures will probably have to submit it online (max 8,000 characters).

 

Please can someone take a look, as I am literally running out of time to send Special Delivery if it needs to include more info. Comments in red are for guidance, and/or attachments to send if it goes in post.

 

Barclaycard was opened well before 2006, so have inclued what I think is relevant!

 

Hope I have covered everything, please let me know, Thank You, Thank you.

In the Northampton County Court

Claim number xxxxxxxxx

 

 

Between

 

C L Finance Ltd - Claimant

and

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx- Defendant

 

Defence

 

1. I xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by C L Finance Ltd

 

2. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimants Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

3. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

4. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any default notices issued or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

d) Without fair warning the claimant brought this action in what appears ignorance of the Civil Procedure Rules as as required under the Pre-Action Protocols Para 4.3, as no letter before action was received.

 

5. Consequently, it is proving difficult to plead to the particulars of the claim as matters stand, and I put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

The relevant Act of Parliament in this Case

 

6. Firstly I will address the issue of which Act is relevant in this case, in case it is suggested that the claim falls under the Consumer Credit Act 2006, it is drawn to the courts attention that schedule 3, s11 of the Consumer Credit Act 2006 prevents s15 repealing s127 (3) of the 1974 Act for agreements made before s15 came into effect. Since the agreement would have commenced prior to the inception of the Consumer Credit Act 2006, section 15 of the 2006 Act has no effect and the Consumer Credit Act 1974 is the relevant act in this case.

Do I need to include relevant section?

7. Therefore the Consumer Credit Act 2006 is not retrospective in its application and has no effect upon this agreement and the Consumer credit Act 1974 is the act which this agreement is regulated by.

 

The Request for Disclosure

 

8. Further to the case, on 11/01/2009 I requested the disclosure of information pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules 18 (attachment?), which is vital to this case from the claimant. The information requested amounted to copies of the Credit Agreement referred to in the particulars of claim and any default or termination notices, a transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, alleged repayments by myself and payments made by the original creditor. Also any other documents the Claimant seeks to rely on, including any default notices or termination notice, and a copy of the Notice of Assignment required to give the claimant a legitimate right of action. Accordingly, having failed to produce a credit agreement within the requisite timescale or at all, the Claimant is in default of said request under section 78(6)(a) of The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

9. To Date the claimant has refused my request under the CPR (letter from CL Finance’s solicitor’s Howard Cohen attachment Exhibit C) and I have not received any such documentation requested. As a result it has proven difficult to compose this defence without disclosure of the information requested, especially as I am a Litigant in Person.

10. The courts attention is drawn to the fact that the without disclosure of the requested documentation pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules I have not yet had the opportunity to assess if the documentation which the claimant claims to be relying upon to bring this action even contains the prescribed terms required in Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) which was amended by Consumer Credit (Agreements) (Amendment) Regulations 2004 (SI2004/1482).

11. The claimant is therefore put to strict proof that such a compliant document exists

The Need for a Default notice

 

12. It is neither admitted nor denied that any Default Notice in the prescribed format was ever received and the Defendant puts the Claimant to strict proof that said document in the prescribed format was delivered to the defendant.

 

13. Notwithstanding point 21, I put the claimant to strict proof that any default notice sent to me was valid. I note that to be valid, a default notice needs to be accurate in terms of both the scope and nature of breach and include an accurate figure required to remedy any such breach. The prescribed format for such document is laid down in Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561) and Amendment regulations the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) (Amendment) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3237)

 

14. Failure of a default notice to be accurate not only invalidates the default notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain and Co - [2001] GCCR 2255) but is a unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the court enforcing any alleged debt, but would also give rise to a potential counterclaim for damages where damage occurs to my credit rating (Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society - [1996] 4 All ER 119)

 

 

Conclusion

 

15. The Defendant denies that there has been any failure to make payment in accordance with the alleged agreement. The Claimant has failed to produce a copy of a credit agreement in the requisite timescale/at all, and in the absence of such an agreement, which conforms to sections 60 and 61 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the Defendant avers that no agreement has ever existed for there to have been any failure to make said payment.

 

16. Without Disclosure of the relevant requested documentation I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable to the claimant, nor am I able to assess if the alleged agreement is properly executed, contain the required prescribed terms, or correct figures to make such an agreement enforceable by virtue of s127 Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

17. In view of the matters pleaded above, I respectfully request that the court gives consideration to whether the claimant's statement of case should be struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim, and/or that it fails to comply with CPR Part 16.

 

18. Alternatively, I respectfully request a stay in proceedings until such time as the claimant complies with the requests outlined in paragraph 8 above or until the court orders its compliance with the same. I will then be in a position to file a fully particularised defence and counterclaim and will seek the courts permission to amend my statement of case accordingly.

 

 

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

Signed .....................xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rory 32,

Hi thanks for your help, and moving the messages over to one thread,

 

Account was opened well over 6 years ago, not sure how long before that as dont have paperwork.

 

Have requested CPR 18 from CL, they replied that they are not obliged. Defence claim has to be submitted by tomrorow night if not done online.

 

Had something that looks like notice of assingment from Lewis Debt saying assigned to CL Finance, but don't know if in order. No pre-action letter before Court Claim which arrived pretty soon after told it was now with CL Finance. default Notice received from Mercers prior to this, but apparently it is in breach.

 

Not sure of the amounts yet, but probably 10% has been added in late payment fees and the interest that has been charged on that. Not sure how much if anything CL have added yet as not had anything from them. All I know is that the total on the Court Claim Form is getting near to £900 above what the balance was when stopped payments 8 months ago, the bulk seems to be interest charged over this time, although they were asked to freeze interest in offer of a small payment, and they refused, even though the reason for non payment was ill and on incapacity benefit. If we had found this site then, things would have been so different :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, what date is on the claim form(so i can work out when this defence must be filed).

 

If you are doing it on MCOL, you dont need the statement of truth.

 

Also you cant include any attachments.

 

Ill have a look for a shorter defence, but get back to me, i need to know how much time you have, keep bumping the thread.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...