Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

made redundant, given garden leave and now given a disciplinary !help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks

 

Could anyone shed a little light on my options in this unusual situation i have found myself in over the last few days!

 

on friday i was taken to a meeting to inform me my role is being made redundant and, as i work with comapny data, it was deemed fair to give me 4 weeks garden leave, and i was permitted to leave.

 

today i got a phonecall from my manager saying since then, information has come to light that i was using the company email and internet "excessively " and "inappropriately" and i am now being invited in for a disciplinary hearing ! (im not the only person to be going through this situation in the company)

 

i totally hold my hands up to both, i was emailing friends and colleagues a lot and using the internet - none of which was sexual or predjudiced in any way, but why on earth are they pursuing this in my redundancy period??

 

is there anything i can do it get out of this? eg resign with 4 weeks notice, to ensure i still get 4 weeks full pay?

 

Im genuinley bewildered as it just seems like such a waste of time.

 

Any advice much appreciated !

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks

 

Could anyone shed a little light on my options in this unusual situation i have found myself in over the last few days!

 

on friday i was taken to a meeting to inform me my role is being made redundant and, as i work with comapny data, it was deemed fair to give me 4 weeks garden leave, and i was permitted to leave.

 

today i got a phonecall from my manager saying since then, information has come to light that i was using the company email and internet "excessively " and "inappropriately" and i am now being invited in for a disciplinary hearing ! (im not the only person to be going through this situation in the company)

 

Does the company have an e mail and internet policy? If so, does it define what it can and cannot be used for? Does it for example say that personal use is OK within reason? How do they define 'excessive' or inappropriate?

 

i totally hold my hands up to both, i was emailing friends and colleagues a lot and using the internet - none of which was sexual or predjudiced in any way, but why on earth are they pursuing this in my redundancy period??

 

Seems strange and very unreasonable. Are you entitled to a redundancy payment which would not be neccessary if they dismiss you beforehand? What do they otherwise have to gain?

 

is there anything i can do it get out of this? eg resign with 4 weeks notice, to ensure i still get 4 weeks full pay?

 

Resignation is not really an option as they are within their rights to refuse to accept it pending the outcome of the disciplinary. Any reference provided might also state your reason for leaving as 'resignation whist a disciplinary matter was being investigated'.

All I can suggest is to stall. Go though your contract from start to finish. Likewise disciplinary procedures. Not got them? Ask for copies - you need to know exactly what you have done which is against the rules.

You say that you have had a telephone call - have you also received a letter? Correct disciplinary procedure states that you should be given written notice to attend, with an outline of what you are supposed to have done wrong. You must also be given the right to have a colleague or Union rep present.

 

String things along for a while then report sick. After all, the stress of being made redundant and the worry of finding a new job is a huge shock. If you are still off sick at the date of the redundancy then what can they do? Not pay you? Can't do it (unlawful deduction from your wages). Postpone the redundancy - as far as I know they can't. Dismiss you? They can't after your official leaving date.

 

Im genuinley bewildered as it just seems like such a waste of time.

 

Absolutely agree.

 

Any advice much appreciated !

 

M

..

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only assume that the company has something to gain financially by such action.

 

If you attend the meeting, take a witness; somebody you trust and who can take notes. Admit nothing. They will have to prove their accusations.

 

The very fact that others who are being made redundant are threatened with disciplinary too smells decidely fishy. Who'd want to work in a company like that?! Good luck and try not to worry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks

 

Thanks very much for your replies, I appreciate them very much .

 

Somethings just crosses my mind - just last week, before my redundancy meeting (I knew it was coming), my manager asked me if i would help with her son's homework (my degree was in history) so i obliged as I didnt have anything else to do, so i spent a few hours on the internet in work time researching this and emailed her an essay ... and now im accused of using internet excessively! brilliant! i cant wait to bring this up in the disciplinary meeting haha...

 

Also, other members of staff in my "team" who use email & internet often are not being disciplined ; i'd rather not but I think I could go to town on them not being disciplined.

 

Thanks again !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep your powder dry and wait to find out exactly what they are trying to discipline you for. If it is the occasion that you researched the history homework then bring it up otherwise they may try to add other instances in order to justify their actions.

 

You are absolutely correct that any disciplinary action should be in line with that taken against others for similar misdemeanours, so it may only be fair if any internet policy is applied equally to the other staff. If it is 'customary' to allow internet and e mail for private use, then the employer cannot single out some people for disciplinary action unless there is an additional reason (eg porn, gambling, blogging about the company etc) and even there it would have to be covered by a policy.

 

Good Luck. Don't forget to let us know the outcome.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP admits they were using the internet at work "excessively " and "inappropriately". I'd guess that as others within the company are being disciplined for this as well ("im not the only person to be going through this situation in the company") that they have to be seen to be acting fair and to discipline everyone that they know has been misusing the internet irrespective of whether theyre leaving or not. I'm sure they'd be criticised for being discriminatory or unfair if they only disciplined some staff.

 

Certainly bring up the fact that you were asked to do some non work stuff by your boss on the internet, but I assume your admission that you'd used it excessively and inappropriately is over and above this?

 

I have to say I dont like someone being advised to take sick leave when theyre not actually sick. It wont make the allegation go away and is a bit like putting your head in the sand. I'd go along and tell them along the lines of 'didnt have enough work to do', 'boss asked me to do internet research' etc etc - unless of course youve been surfing porn sites and the like (which I must admit comes to mind when you say 'inappropriate' use)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, it seems to me that the company is trying to save themselves a few quid by getting you up on a misconduct charge so they can dismiss you before your due redundancy date, thus saving themselves having to make a redundancy payout.

 

Have they said exactly what they constitute to be "excessive" and "inappropriate" use of the internet?, because to me it seems like all they are doing is trying to find some reason so they can trump up a charge of gross misconduct.

 

Firstly, your boss shouldnt have asked you to do their sons homework for them, especially in work hours. Make sure you bring this up, as no doubt your boss will deny that they asked you to do this.

 

Secondly, it would be worth retracting your original admittance of guilt, as they have not made clear what exactly their definition of "excessive and inappropriate" internet usage is, it could be that they have simply changed the goalposts with regards to what they consider this to be in order to bring you and others up on trumped up charges.

 

Why did you make an admission of guilt though?, what sort of sites were you looking at while at work?, I take it some sites were not work related.

 

Most of the companies I have worked for didnt mind you using the internet for personal reasons so long as you did it on your break/dinner and werent looking at sexual or illegal stuff.

 

 

A lot of companies in these times are pulling stunts like this basically to save money, but what they dont realise is that it will have a knock on effect to your future career prospects,a s if you do get dismissed for gross misconduct, this will be included on any references that any future employers ask for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...