Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hearing held today in court. I attended in person and Evri had an advocate attend on their behalf to defend their position that my contract is with Packlink and not with them. I also provided a copy of Evri's terms and conditions which explains that a contract is entered into when a parcel is sent with Evri. The judge pointed this out to the Advocate and agreed there is a contract between me and Evri under the Ts and Cs. The judge explained that while Packlink are responsible for organising the delivery of the item, it is Evri who are responsible for handling the goods and delivering them, and therefor Evri has a responsibility to handle the goods with reasonable care and skill. So am pleased to say the judge found in my favour. Hearing lasted about 75mins. Evri has been ordered to make payment within 21 days. Also nice to meet @jk2054 in person.
    • Good morning,    I just wanted to update you on the situation.    I have visits piling up with my current employment and they need doing before I finish at the end of this month.  I am moving to Wiltshire in 3 weeks for a new job helping care homes with their Dementia patients. I tried to work it out and at a guess I will be doing about 20-25,000 miles a year. So need a vehicle that can cope with that mileage, my old car would have done it easy but 🤷‍♂️ I have taken out a loan and got a friend to find me a reliable car that can cope with the miles and hasn't been written off in the past.   I phoned Adrian flux to see if I could use the last months insurance on a new car I have bought, the girl I spoke to phoned Markerstudy and asked them but they said no, my new car doesn't have any modifications.    I had an email from someone who saw one of my appeals for information, they live near the site of the accident and know a nearby farmer who has a security camera at his entrance that catches the traffic and specifically registration plates as he has been robbed before. They said they would reach out for me and see if he still has the data. Unfortunately it wont catch the scene of the crash.   The Police phoned me and said they were closing the report I made, even if they found footage of the vehicle at the time I said the actual incident would be my word vs theirs.  My first response was I am sure google maps would show that they turned around at that location which would verify my version of events, but upon reflection I do understand, I have seen people doing make up with both hands while driving, eating from a bowl steering with their knees and veering all over the place. I am sure some of these people go off the road and claim that someone forced them off.    Markerstudy phoned me yesterday to say that my car is now at Copart, the £80 tank of Vpower diesel was emptied on entry to the site for safety reasons, which I get but it sucks.  It is awaiting being assessed and shouldn't be too long, which is a relief.  I am really glad things do not seem to be going the way of the other stories and they seem to moving quickly.   However I was informed that my car was a structural write off before I bought it - this destroyed me, I was almost sick.  and this is going to affect any offer of money - after hearing the first statement this didn't affect me.   They need to wait for the assessor to check it over but it is highly likely to be written off and the maximum they can offer is £2300.  I was desperate for a car as I was working for an agency at the time, no work no pay, and did not do a vehicle check because I didn't know about them.  The seller did not tell me that it had been structurally written off, he told me that it had the front wing damaged while parked and was repaired at an approved repairer.  Markerstudy records state that it was sold at auction, no record of repair at an approved repairer.  I bought it bank transfer with hand written receipt.    It gets worse.    It turns out my airbags should of gone off. For some reason they are not working. I think we can figure out why.  If I had hit that car head on and had no airbags.    Some good news.    I can arrange a time with Copart to go and take my stereo equipment and any personal items that are left in the car only. I cant live without music and need quality sound, my speakers and amps are Hertz and JLaudio, (no I am not a boy racer with booming subs, I am an audiophile on a budget) I was really worried I wouldn't get them back so this is a huge relief for me. It is stuff I have built up over years of saving and collecting. Everything to do with the vehicle and mods I have declared need to stay to be assessed.   The accident has gone as a fault on my record, I have to remove 2 years NCB which means I still have some to declare which is good.  So it appears at this point that it may be resolved quickly, not in the way I was hoping, but not as bad as I presumed it was going to be based upon that tow truck drivers attitude and behaviour and the horror stories I read.   I am not going to buy the car back and try to make money with all the parts on it, I don't have the time or energy.   I may need an xray on my back and neck.  The whole situation has left me feeling physically sick, drained and I need it done.   The lesson learnt from this  -  My conscience is 100% clear, my attitude to safety and strong sense of personal responsibility - A rated tyres even if on credit card, brake fluid flush every year, regular checks of pads and discs, bushes etc, made avoiding what I believed to be a certain broadside collision possible.   Get a dashcam (searching now for the best I can afford at the moment)  -  Research your insurance company before you buy  -  Pay for total car check before you go and see a car and take someone with you if you are not confident in your ability to assess a vehicle.      Thank you to everyone here who volunteers their time, energy and information, it is greatly appreciated.  You helped my sister with some advice a while ago but we weren't able to follow through, she is struggling with long term health conditions and I ended up in hospital for a while with myocarditis, when I got out and remembered it was too late.  I am going to make a donation now, it is not a lot, I wish I could give more, I will try to come back when things are on a more even keel.    Take care
    • It seems the solicitor has got your case listed for this “appeal” but not for the Stat Dec(SD). You need to ensure you can perform your SD on the day. If you are able to make your SD in court, the situation you are in now is more straightforward than if you made your SD via a solicitor. You have been convicted of two offences (and two were dropped) via proceedings of which you were not aware. The way to remedy that is to perform an SD. No appeal is necessary (nor is it available via the magistrates’ court). If you are able to make your SD this is how I see it panning out: You will make your SD to the court. The court must allow you to make it as it will have been made within 21 days of you discovering your convictions. You will then be asked to enter pleas to the four charges again. At this point you should plead not guilty to all four but make the court aware that you will plead guilty to the speeding charges on the condition that the FtP charges are dropped. The prosecutor will be asked whether or not this is agreed. In my opinion the overwhelming likelihood is that it will be. If it is you will be sentenced for the two speeding offences under the normal guidelines. In the unlikely event it is not accepted,  the speeding charges will be withdrawn (they have no evidence you were driving). You have no viable defence to the FtP charges and so should plead guilty. This will mean 12 points and a “totting up” ban (as you have already suffered). You can present an “Exceptional Hardship” argument to try to avoid this (explained below).   Because of this, I don’t see any need to make an argument to ask to have any ban suspended (pending an appeal to the Crown Court) unless and until you are banned again. The only reason I can think the solicitor suggested this is to secure a (Magistrates')  court date. I was surprised when you said you had an appointment so quickly; a date for an SD usually takes longer than that. However, if you can use it to your advantage, all well and good. I can’t comment on the argument that the two speeding offences were committed “on the same occasion” as I don’t have the details. That phrase is not defined anywhere and is a matter for the court to decide. It’s an interesting thought (and only that) that such an argument could equally be made for the two FtP offences. If the requests for driver’s details arrived at your old address at the same time, with the same deadline for reply, it could be argued that you failed to respond to hem both “on the same occasion” (i.e when the 28 days to respond expired) and so should only receive penalty points for one. Hopefully you won’t need to go there. I think you have information about avoiding a “totting up” ban. But here’s the magistrates’ latest guidance on "Exceptional Hardship" (EH) which they refer to: When considering whether there are grounds to reduce or avoid a totting up disqualification the court should have regard to the following: It is for the offender to prove to the civil standard of proof that such grounds exist. Other than very exceptionally, this will require evidence from the offender, and where such evidence is given, it must be sworn. Where it is asserted that hardship would be caused, the court must be satisfied that it is not merely inconvenience, or hardship, but exceptional hardship for which the court must have evidence; Almost every disqualification entails hardship for the person disqualified and their immediate family. This is part of the deterrent objective of the provisions combined with the preventative effect of the order not to drive. If a motorist continues to offend after becoming aware of the risk to their licence of further penalty points, the court can take this circumstance into account. Courts should be cautious before accepting assertions of exceptional hardship without evidence that alternatives (including alternative means of transport) for avoiding exceptional hardship are not viable; Loss of employment will be an inevitable consequence of a driving ban for many people. Evidence that loss of employment would follow from disqualification is not in itself sufficient to demonstrate exceptional hardship; whether or not it does will depend on the circumstances of the offender and the consequences of that loss of employment on the offender and/or others. I must say, I still do not understand what the solicitor means by “As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge.” When they speak of “leave of the judge” I assume they mean they have lodged an appeal with the Crown Court. I don’t know what for or why they would do this. It seems to follow on from their explanation of the “totting up” ban. If so, I’m surprised that the Crown Court has accepted an appeal against something that has not yet happened. But as I said, i is no clear to me. Only you can decide whether to employ your solicitor to represent you in court. If it was me I would not because there is nothing he can say that you cannot say yourself. However, I am fairly knowledgeable of the process and confident I can deal with it. That said, I do have a feeling that the solicitor is somewhat “over egging the pudding” by introducing such things as appeals to the Crown Court which, in all honesty, you can deal with if they are required. I can only say that the process you will attempt to employ is by no means unusual and all court users will be familiar with it. I can also say that I have only ever heard of one instance where it was refused. In summary, it is my view that it is very unlikely that your offer to do the deal will be refused. If it is accepted, you may be able to persuade he court that the two speeding offences occurred "on the same occasion" and so should only receive one lot of points. Let me know the details (timings, places, etc) and I'll give you my opinion. Just in case your offer is refused, you should have your EH argument ready. Whether it's worth paying what will amount to many hundreds of pounds to pay someone to see this through is your call.  Let me know if I can help further.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

roko20650 v Tesco Visa


roko20650
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5435 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help please,

 

My husband is self employed and has been laid off his sub-contract work and there is nothing out there, we are homeowners with a mortgage and are unable to pay our credit card debt to Tesco Visa, thinking of debt management but would like first to try going it alone, any help would be appreciated.

 

Ta muchly

Edited by roko20650
Link to post
Share on other sites

well you could write to them explaining your current situation and offer a reduced payment, sit down and work out what you can afford. go into the letter template section there are letters there you can use to write to your creditors good luck and come back with any questions you may have

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response, at present can't afford anything thats the problem and I have never not paid before. I have been pointed in the direction of Payplan or CCCS so I will give them a ring and see what they suggest and then weigh up my optionsl. It feels good to start taking control though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The fee for a CCA request is £1

 

Request for information under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account/Reference Number: XXXXXXXXXX

 

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a true copy of this particular credit agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Section 77), I am entitled to receive a true and legible copy of my credit agreement (containing all the required prescribed terms) on request.

I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the statutory fee payable under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I'm a little confused, I sent them a cheque for the £1 and in the first paragraph, although its a little disjointed it acknowledges it. What they sent to me is what they have. I left some detail showing and have therefore removed the attachments and I will have to re-attach and post tomorrow. Do I still need to send your letter above, or another?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an application form which does not contain the prescribed terms within the four corners of the signed page, also it gives no links to them so it is unenforceable. You can send them the following letter;

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

RE: Agreement/Account number

 

Thank you for your response to my letter dated xxxxxx 2009, making a formal request for a true copy of the original credit agreement for the above account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

The documents you supplied me appear to be no more than an application form, and as such are not a satisfactory response to my request. Nowhere on the front of the document is there any reference to the prescribed terms and conditions that such an agreement must contain. I must assume that these are unconnected documents and once again inadequate to satisfy your obligations.

 

I also I note that you have replied to the above by sending your companies Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

As you are aware you are obliged to provide me with a true copy of my agreement as defined under Section 189 of the CCA 1974. and I consider that you have failed to comply with my request for these documents

 

 

Under the terms of the above Act, a creditor has 12 working days to provide the requested documents. This deadline has now passed and I have not received the requested documents from you.

 

As I am sure you are aware, an agreement that does not contain all of the prescribed terms, and/or is not signed by the debtor, is completely unenforceable & I therefore consider that this account is in dispute with immediate effect & it follows that all payments to this account are suspended forthwith.

 

I draw your attention to the legal requirement that a creditor is not permitted to take any action against an account whilst it remains in dispute. The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and therefore the following applies:

You must not demand any payment on this account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

You must not add any further interest or charges to this account.

You must not pass this account to any third party.

You must not register any information in respect of this account with any of the credit reference agencies.

You must not issue a default notice on this account

I hereby give you notice that if you proceed with any of the above actions, I will file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now re-attached the letter with CCA and another letter received from them charging me £12. late payment fee. Is this enforceable? What do I do next.

 

Roko20650

 

I got the exact same thing, signed application form plus loads of gumph.

 

Not enforceable as it is only the application not an agreement.

 

Sent a similar letter to 'cerberusalert's' and will cancel my DD soon! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much, Cerberusalert and basa48, I am very relieved. I will send the letter to them today. Will they start to hassle me on the phone do you think? Have you had an calls yet basa48?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do start 'phoning you send this;

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Harassment by telephone

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only. [if you Want Them to]

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

Yours faithfully, **Print name do not sign**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a few telephone calls from them now, one caller told me to make an official complaint if I felt the calls were excessive! Believe it or not I received a replacement credit card from them today! Left hand does not know what the right hand is doing obviously. I have now sent a telephone harrassment letter to them.

Roko20650

Link to post
Share on other sites

No phone calls for me yet, but received this:

 

tescoreply1.jpg

tescoreply1lastpage.jpg

 

And this will be my response:

I am in receipt of your letter of 13/03/09. I have indeed taken most adequate advice and whilst I note you you have expressed you do not wish further correspondence on this matter, I feel it is my duty to advise you further of your breach of the law and any remedies I may pursue.

 

Unfortunately whilst you may argue you have supplied an agreement pursuant to s78 CCA 1974, the actual terms of s78 required you to provide a true copy of an executed agreement. Your argument is therefore flawed in so much as the document you provided, whilst it may be a true copy of what is in your possession, as I pointed out, it does not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 Section 61(1) and Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 Schedule 1 in that clearly not all the ‘prescribed terms’ are present and thus is not properly executed.

 

It is the lack of a properly executed agreement that is a very clear dispute and it is for these reasons that I DISPUTED (and still dispute) the alleged agreement.

 

I should also remind you it is not your decision whether or not this account is in dispute. The fact that I have queried the legality of any alleged agreement on which this account is based and you have thus far not provided a signed and compliant credit agreement for the account, automatically makes it disputed in law.

 

Again you should note that in the opinion of the Office of Fair Trading, creditors should not suggest that they have a signed compliant credit agreement where they are unable to provide evidence to support this – to do so could be a ‘misleading action’ under Reg.5 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations.

 

You are again strongly reminded that the following applies in relation to this alleged agreement whilst it is in dispute.

 

You: * are not entitled, while the dispute continues, to enforce the agreement.

* may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* may not pass the account to a third party.

* may not issue a default notice related to the account.

* may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

 

In clarification of the last point: To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed and compliant credit agreement and is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998, so until you produce a valid agreement, you may not share my data. Any attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office. You may also note that sharing my data with credit reference agencies whilst an account is in dispute is contrary to The Banking Code para. 13.6.

 

If you do issue a default notice against a disputed agreement or persist in sharing my data with third parties regarding a disputed agreement, I will instigate court proceedings to have the alleged agreement declared unenforceable, the default removed and the information removed from my credit file. This may well result in the costs of the action being awarded against you.

 

In that respect I draw your attention to CCA 1974 s127(3): 'The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner)'. [see Ref: Lord Nicholls (The Opinions of the Lords Of Appeal for Judgment in the Cause: Wilson and others v. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (Appellant) 10/07/2003) and Ref: HHJ Overend: Central Trust Plc v Spurway [2005] CCLR).].

 

Obviously if any agreement is improperly executed I would be entitled to ask the court to consider the agreement and make a declaration of the rights of the parties to the agreement.

 

To that end I again respectfully request that you provide me by return a copy of any compliant and properly executed credit agreement, other than that you have already supplied, relating to the disputed agreement, that bears my signature.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which I have asked for will allow me to assess if any case for enforceability has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court which would undoubtedly save time and costs on both sides.

 

You will be aware of course that I am entitled to request this information pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules (Disclosure & Inspection of Documents, Part 31.16 - Disclosure before proceedings start) should you not respond with either a compliant agreement or alternatively that you cannot produce a compliant agreement.

 

I would be happy therefore for you contact me further in writing and in any case within 14 days with your intentions to resolve this matter, which remains a formal complaint. In the absence of a signed compliant agreement, I would again invite you to consider reducing any alleged debt to £0 and enter a ‘full and final settlement’ as discharged on the alleged account and with any third parties.

 

To sum up, I am not obliged to make any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Roko, et al....

 

We have a CCA paper identical to your Tesco cca, the only difference being ours is dated July 2000 - they are just a few months apart

 

So, my missus was all for handing it over to a solicitor to tackle it, but,

I just saw your response to them.

 

This is fantastic, absobloodylutely fantasic, it's taken me weeks to get my head round these prescribed terms, now I have them printed and pinned on the wall..

 

It's coming to me slowly, but gaining speed... just another 9 to go for my family.. wow - as they say, slowly slowly catchee monkey.

 

Thanks ever so much, at my extreme age there's no chance that I could ever do the research to come up with letters like this.

 

Good luck to us all...

 

charlie*

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there are any site admins looking in.

 

Can we start a new section under 'Other Institutions' for Tesco credit cards.

 

There are three threads running now under 'General Debt Issues' and they are hard to track.

 

The threads are:

 

this one

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/185671-tesco-personnel-finance.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/188930-tesco-credit-card-cca.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/189210-tesco-credit-card-cca.html

 

The last two threads could be merged.

 

Oh .. and I will probably start one soon as Tesco reply to my last letter ! ;-)

Edited by basa48
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all,

Hope you're all succeeding with your problems.

Just a quick note to say don't forget about my thread as well, lol

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/186898-tesco-c-card-response.html

Looks to be the same responses as Roko20650's

Will be posting more details soon to my thread along with the response letter i'll be sending.

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi roko

 

I have received very similar documentation from tesco

 

Your application form looks similar to mine. does it have your address printed on the top, ie a form sent to you inviting you to apply. some forms on other threads don't have this but have a "moisten and fold" instruction on the bottom, ie possible an application form picked up in store, this type would not have anything on the back of importance other than the address to return the form.

 

My worry with your application and mine is that i wonder if the agreement was on the back of the form, although there is no ref on app form as to " see overleaf" i worry that if it went as far as court a judge may say look the correct agreement is overleaf.

 

what are your thoughts

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...