Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black Horse Hire Purchase Agreement - Car Taken **please Help**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In November 2007, i purchased a vehicle from a motor dealer and the finance was arranged through Black Horse Finance. The car was always kept clean and insured. All the payments were going out on time. In October 2008, a friend of mine had borrowed the car and for some reason was stopped by the police and the car was compounded. I went to collect the vehicle from the compound and was told that Black Horse had refused to release the car to me. I contacted Black Horse and was told the their Fraud Investigator that the vehicle had been taken as there was no insurance on it and I had leased it out to a car hire company. All this was untrue as the car was comprehensively insured and I have never leased it to anybody. Black Horse failed to give me a clear reason and the car was sold. I purchased the car for £14,500 and the total finance package came to £19,000. Black Horse sold the car for £5000. I have made a complaint and they have sent me a statement of my account showing that I still owe £10,000. They claim that the reason my agreement was terminated was because I had broken the Terms & Conditions of the contract. It does say in the contract that if the vehicle is seized by any authority, Black Horse MAY terminate the agreement. The police have never confirmed to me why the car was taken and it was them who had informed Black Horse. Furhter to this, Black Horse are asking me to pay £500 for reposession fees. These fees were for them instructing a collection agent to recover the vehicle. I went to collect the car from the compound the day after it was taken but Black Horse refused to release it hence the car stayed in incurring more daily charges. My complaint is still ongoing but I don't think they are listaning to me. Are they allowed to do this ?? I still maintained my monthly payments after the car was taken but I am now expected to pay £10,000 for a car i do not have. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE SOMEBODY HELP ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may need lagal advise on this, suggest you get a solicitor to at least review the contract and the circumstnces of its siezure and return to the finance company. they are the legal owners.

If the person you loaned the car to was not insured they can impound it.

Finance companies only usually take it back on non-payment so they must have a good reason in this case and then they need a court order if you have paid over one third of the agreement costs.

For their claim for the outstanding costs and in court they will have explian the reasons why they did what they did and that they acted in a justifiable and reasonable way.

Get a full explaination from them in writing as to the events and why they acted in the way they did and record that you dispute their actions being justified; to get it all on record when they start chasing you for the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You Raydetinu,

 

I know that the person who was driving the car when it was taken was definitely insured as he had taken out his own insurance policy on the car. I would never allow for anybody to drive my car without insurance. I have tried contacting the Police regarding this but the officer concerned is never available when i call nor does he return my calls.

 

I have tried looking for a solicitor who specializes in HP agreements locally, but they are asking for £100 per consultation. I am a bit hesitant as i do not want to pay so much money only to be told to contact the police and finance company.

 

Black Horse have contradicted what they haave said in their response. The fraud investigator wrote to me informing that the agreement was terminated as the car had been leased to a hire comaony but when i made a complaint, i received a letter from Black Horse stating that the car had been taken as it was not insured. I know it was insured !.

 

This is so frustrating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You now need to collect all the information that you can relating to the siezure; police report detailing the circumstances as to why it was stopped in the first place the officers reports giving the name of the driver; then proof by certificate that he was in fact insured ( not all are on the database hence some are seized incorrectly ); copies of all your payments to prove up to date; request proof from them about it being leased to hire company, or if you can prove it was not; petrol receipts on your card; neighbours that it was on your road drive during that period; anything that you can through at them to counter their claims really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

530man

 

you need to get all the info off of black horse

i think a sar is in order on this one

 

if what you say is correct, black horse have terminated the agreement unlawfully

you are entitled to get back every penny you have paid them and no default

 

but get the sar in to find out what is going on

Link to post
Share on other sites

530man

 

you need to get all the info off of black horse

i think a Subject Access Request is in order on this one

 

if what you say is correct, black horse have terminated the agreement unlawfully

you are entitled to get back every penny you have paid them and no default

 

but get the sar in to find out what is going on

 

How do i get the Subject Access Request ? Do i just write them a letter requesting this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

print but don't sign your name

 

enclose a 10 pound postel order and send recorded delievery

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I wrote to the Police asking for all the information as to why the vehicle was initially stopped and then seized. The investigating office has responded by telling me that the vehicle was initiall stopped 'Under the powers of The Road Traffic Act 1988' and then seized as the Police Officer was not satisfied that the driver was insured to drive the vehicle. The officer claims that he spoke to me at the time, on my mobile, and I allegedly confirmed to him that the driver was my cousin and i had 'hired' the vehicle to him !! That is a complete lie. I have never spoken to the Police Officer. I know the car was insured, as the driver was issued a HORT1 (producer) and he produced proof of insurance within 7 days. I have written back to the police asking them to double check which number their officer called as i can guarantee it wasn't mine and also what proof they have got that the vehicle was being used for hire seeing as they told Black Horse this which is why Black Horse refused to let the vehicle be released to me.

 

I am now awaiting the outcome

 

I have requested the SAR from Black Horse and am also awating this

Link to post
Share on other sites

530man, sorry to hear of your hassles with BH, trust me there not great at customer service at present, infact defaulting me when i was a day late on payments....thats a different story..

right

The police can stop any vehicle without any valid reason under then law you mentioned. The police officer at the time of stopping the car could have easily rang the insurance company to confirm if the car was insured or not. Did the police officer respond in writing or was it by phone? if it was by phone ask for a written confirmation of the actions he alledgedly performed.

 

You could also, whilst its still fresh, get your friend to write a statement of the events that happened that day. its best to do it now rather then 6 months down the line when you need one. Keep a diary yourself of everything, include copies of all letters sent/recieved.

 

Good Luck

Halifax Bank - Owed £1599

23/3 - Data Protection Act sent

24/5 - Data Protection Act finally arrived

25/5 - Demand for repayment sent

04/10 Court bundle filed with court and Halifax

29/10 STAY ISSUED

JAN 08 - Currently being harrased by debt collectors!

Mar 08 - New DCA - Stopped in there tracks

Jun 08 - And another

Jul 08 - Complaint made to HBOS

Nov 08 - My accounts been sold to a DCA

Jan 09 - New complaint issued against HBOS

Mar 09 - Halifax re-aquired the debt

Apr 09 - Applying for Hardship.

 

at least they removed 2 defaults in selling accounts! :D

 

I dont not claim to know everything and any advice i give should be treated as MY opinion.

 

If ive been helpful tip the scales!

or better still

DONATE TO CAG - every tenner helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
530man

 

you need to get all the info off of black horse

i think a sar is in order on this one

 

if what you say is correct, black horse have terminated the agreement unlawfully

you are entitled to get back every penny you have paid them and no default

 

but get the sar in to find out what is going on

 

I have received the SAR from Black Horse. Amongst the paperwork, there is a fax from the police to Black Horse Finance informing them that the car was being used for hire and was uninsured to do so but there is no evidence of this. The police have confirmed that the vehicle was insured at the time for me & my wife to drive it. I raised this with the police but the officer was reluctant to go into details. I am currently considering reporting this to the IPCC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...