Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Murphy v Yorkshire Bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Caro

 

I posted a letter over 4 weeks ago, Basically asking for them to settle as the case has been stayed since 30th August 2007 and it has been over 2yrs. My claim is for £1600 with interest £2528. The interest was correct 2yrs ago, however would this have changed. I stated in my letter that I was willing to accept the £1600 within 14 days. If they did not accept this offer then I would be applying to the Court for the stay to be lifted under the Hardship Terms. I have had a repssesion order on my house and the £1600 would clear my arrears. Should I have stated this.

 

I forgot to add, That the did send me a cheque 2yrs ago for £564 and I returned it to them - Is this not them admitting there in the wrong.

 

I have not heard anything from them.

What do I do know?

What is the current situation with the Courts?

 

Thanks Caro xx

 

Thanks Caro.

Edited by murphy55

Abbey National - Prelim Letter sent / LBA sent 10th August.

Capital One - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - Offered £428 - Refused. Statement received Actual charges £1060. M/C ISSUED PAID IN FULL I WON

GMAC Redmption Penalty - Letter sent requesting full detailed explaination of charges/exspense and penalty charges received

Yorkshire Bank/Visa - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent. Visa Prelim sent £235. No statements as yet for Bank Account.

 

This site has been so helpfull I will donate to keep it running to help others. :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Caro

 

I posted a letter over 4 weeks ago, Basically asking for them to settle as the case has been stayed since 30th August 2007 and it has been over 2yrs. My claim is for £1600 with interest £2528. The interest was correct 2yrs ago, however would this have changed. I stated in my letter that I was willing to accept the £1600 within 14 days. If they did not accept this offer then I would be applying to the Court for the stay to be lifted under the Hardship Terms. I have had a repssesion order on my house and the £1600 would clear my arrears. Should I have stated this.

 

Most definitely worth stating this.

 

I forgot to add, That the did send me a cheque 2yrs ago for £564 and I returned it to them - Is this not them admitting there in the wrong.

 

I imagine that this was the usual "gesture of good will" and not an admission. I suspect that it was also full and final settlement preventing you going back again. If you manage to get a payment due to hardship you are still free to go back for the rest.

 

I have not heard anything from them.

What do I do know?

What is the current situation with the Courts?

 

Thanks Caro xx

 

Thanks Caro.

 

The supreme court is due to hand down it's judgment any day so keep your eyes on the press and on CAG for news.

 

In all honesty the court is unlikely to lift the stay and the FOS has proved more successful in getting hardship payments.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro

 

I will listen out in the next few day what the Judgement is?

 

You state the FOS has proved more successful, What is FOS ?

 

Thanks

Abbey National - Prelim Letter sent / LBA sent 10th August.

Capital One - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - Offered £428 - Refused. Statement received Actual charges £1060. M/C ISSUED PAID IN FULL I WON

GMAC Redmption Penalty - Letter sent requesting full detailed explaination of charges/exspense and penalty charges received

Yorkshire Bank/Visa - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent. Visa Prelim sent £235. No statements as yet for Bank Account.

 

This site has been so helpfull I will donate to keep it running to help others. :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have said FSA. FOS is the Financial Ombudsman Service and FSA is the Financial Services Authority. Take a look at this.

 

The Consumer Forums - Applying for refunds of bank charges on the basis of hardship

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FSA ? Complaining to them wouldnt get you very far as an individual.

 

The FOS hasnt been that much more successful at hardship payments than a direct appeal to the bank with full Income /expenditure details, outline of effects of charges and evidences of priority debt arrears, but certainly much more successful than the court route (which is ill and unfounded for hardship claims) its extremely unlikely they would even consider lifting a stay on hardship grounds.

''I have had a repssesion order on my house and the £1600 would clear my arrears. Should I have stated this.'' Yes - its imperative you include this in your letter asking for some help from the bank.

 

The Bank have to acknowledge your hardship claim in 5 days, send you any Income Expenditure forms, and then respond to you with a decision within 8 weeks, and then if you don't agree you can take the claim to the FOS (who deal with fairness rather than legalitys)

 

And that link, Caro, is that meant to be your guide to help people gain interim payments under hardship ??

 

Have a read here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-charges-finance-industry/190348-itn-news-3.html there is some good information there.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...