Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It would just be good to get a few more opinions on the judges decision before I decide whether to push on with it or stop if there's every chance I will lose and owe them more in legal costs
    • America is a republic, (and) not a democracy - not quite there yet   Trump is a corrupt felon, not a president - yep
    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • filed the defence at same time as suggested @dx100uk
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Aktiv Kapital CCA Response


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5609 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have just had a response from Aktiv Kapital RE my request for my CCA. It goes as follows :

 

We acknowledge receipt of your request for information under the CCA 1974, however, we are not the original creditor nor did we provide you with the original credit facility. We purchased your outstanding debt balance and right to collect that balance, together with the right to apply interest in accordance with your original credit agreement (where appropriate). We did not purchase your actual agreement, consequently we have no obligation to provide you with a copy of that agreement.

 

However, as a matter of good practice, we have sought to obtain a copy of the original agreement from the original creditor and if it is available we will forward a copy to you as soon as possible.

 

Please note that if the original creditor is unable to provide a copy of the agreement that does not mean that we have no right to continue to request payment of the outstanding balance.

 

Any thoughts? As I understand this is complete rubbish!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

You are correct. it is total rubbish.

As they say, they bought the debt so they bought the rights and resposibilities that go with it. they just say that cr*p to attempt to throw you off.

If they fail to provide the CCA within the 12+2 working days, you are well within your rights to stop paying them until a VALID CCA turns up.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought as much. I won't be paying them anyway so thats not a problem! :p

 

I have sent off another 8 CCA requests, and a PPI reclaim to Welcome Finance, so will post the replies to these when / if i get them.

 

Just out of interest, some of the debts that I have sent CCA requests for are mostly comprised of charges (notably Citi Credit Card , GE Capital and IKANO). Can I also try and reclaim these in the meantime or should I just go down the CCA route initially.

 

Thanks

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lee.jamie

Personally I would be inclined to ignore this utter Bull**it but if you feel the need to reply send them this

Ref

Dear

Thank you for your letter dated XXXXXX its contents have been noted.

As a company collecting this debt to which I do not acknowledge, I must remind you of your duties under the Consumer Credit Act:

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5 (2), 3(b), 6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

Should you be unsure of any matter relating to the CCA request I suggest you contact your legal advisors for confirmation.

 

I will accept your letter dated XXXXXX as proof that you have acknowledged my request. For convenience I have enclosed the same £1.00 postal order to cover the costs.

 

I look forward to receiving your reply.

 

Yours sincerely

"THE CAG IS MY SHEPHERD I SHALL NOT PAY": :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have a reply from this!!

We refer to previous communications in regards to the-above account.

We acknowledge receipt of your request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

We are now in receipt of the original application form for this account, however Data Protection law prohibits us from issuing a copy to you before we have confirmed your identity and residence.

 

We now require proof of your previous address, please provide documents to show the address you resided at in july 2001.

 

On receipt of this information we will forward a copy of the documents to you. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any further queries.

 

Firstly - they have the application form, which is not what I asked for. And secondly - how do they expect me to have proof of address from 8 years ago!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What utter rubbish.

If they have been writing to you at the address you are living, how can they suddenly say they have to have proof of who you are. If your address is good enough for their threatograms then it should be good enough for them to fulfill your request.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sect 77/78 CCA 1974 makes no provision for these people to make their own rules up as they go along. Nor does t specify that you have to produce proof of identity or anything else for that matter. Remember you are not asking for anything under the data protection legislation. If they are relying on the Law of Property Act for their definition of assignment, than this would be an equitable assignment. they would then be unable to take any formal recovery action without the original creditor. Which way do they want it?

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are past the default date, send the A/C in dispute letter but add to it that as they have been sending letters to you at your address before, what's the problem now.

We all know they are stalling. Stick to your timeline, not theirs.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the CCA letters I sent were delivered (checked on royal mail) by the 9th January at the latest. All of them, except Fredrickson, have replied. Robinson Way sent all 3 of my letters back for seperate accounts, along with cheques, saying they had passed the account back to the client and were no longer dealing with it. I'm guessing they didn't have any paperwork whatsoever!

 

Anyway, I havent sent any further letters, what is the next step for the ones not received?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just follow them up with the having not complied with my CCA request account is now in dispute, they have defaulted on your request and really they are now breaking the law aka they have commited a crime. So really dont worry just see what happens and if they try the old Stat Demand threats which they send out like candy just get em set aside and let the judge throw them out of court. Simple.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a reply from this!!

 

We refer to previous communications in regards to the-above account.

We acknowledge receipt of your request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

We are now in receipt of the original application form for this account, however Data Protection law prohibits us from issuing a copy to you before we have confirmed your identity and residence.

 

We now require proof of your previous address, please provide documents to show the address you resided at in july 2001.

 

On receipt of this information we will forward a copy of the documents to you. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any further queries.

 

Firstly - they have the application form, which is not what I asked for. And secondly - how do they expect me to have proof of address from 8 years ago!!

 

AK did the self same thing to me when I requested CCA details, I ignored them and they haven't written back since...When was this you ask? ...February 2007

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all,

Seems like they at AK write what they want. I CCA'd them 22/01/09,my reply from them dasted 26/01/09 "We can confirm that we are currently in the process of obtaining the original documentation on your behalf and will be back in contact shortly." - shortly, thats a bit of an open ended statement, I gave them the usual 12 plus 2 - today the 4th still waiting, seems like they have a different answer for every request.

This is for a supposed card off 10 years ago, and has everyone noticed its the same printed signiture on every reply, well smudgy copied.Also on the back of the crappy paper its on, iare the ways you can still pay - God do they still try it on - what part of NUMPTY dont you understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not had anything else from them so far - nor have they chased me for the debt, although I know this is early days!! Sent the letter on 7th Jan 09. Lets see what fun games they try and play next!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...