Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • “Not realising it was a no parking zone” doesn’t help you if the timing is correct, as (at least, on Google Maps / View) there is clear signage ('7am to midnight', parked at 15:22) What might be worth pursuing is the "ticket handed to driver" aspect : do you have any view on why they would be  stating that?
    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debenhams


xoxnitaxox
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I ordered a pair of shorts on the 7th of June, they arrived promptly the next day. Opened the package to find they'd sent the wrong size - the size on the invoice was correct, but they'd packed a different size... they were HUGE! So, used return slip and took it to post office (got return reciept). Waited a week and still no refund. Emailed them and they said we've not recieved the item back yet, we need 21 days. So left it... they got told i needed to send my return reciept cos they still hadn't recieved item. Which I did right away. It's now been 36 days and still no refund. I keep emailing and keep getting fobbed off.. last email I got read:

 

Thank you for your e-mail.

 

Please allow a little longer for us to receive and process your

proof of return.

 

If you have any further questions or comments about the service we offer, please contact us - we're here to help.

 

It's the last little bit that makes me cringe! "We're here to help".

 

Any ideas if there's anything I can do to force them to give me a refund, I'm getting fed up of being messed about now.

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send the original proof of posting or a copy. If you sent the original have you got a copy of it?

 

I would write to them stating in clear terms that If you don't receive a refund within 7 days you will seek to recover you losses in the small claims court.

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a copy of it... wasn't about to give up the only proof I had that they'd been returned.

 

I emailed them first thing this morning and gave them 48 hours to come up with a solution (gimme back my money!) or I'd be reporting them to trading standards, not heard anything yet, but will let you know if they bother to reply.

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a reply off them. Basically saying I need to wait another 21 days! So told them I'm not willing to wait, but would extend the deadline to 7 days. Getting really annoyed now, I've been waiting on this refund for ages, it's more annoying because they were returned for reasons that weren't my fault!

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i have recently got married and used debenhams for our wedding list, this seems to have been a bad mistake, we chose two delivery dates, the first the day before our wedding.

as you can check the items purchased on line we knew what to expect on the first delivery. lots, some items were ordered 2 months in advance. what actually turned up was 3 items ordered in our local debenhams two days before and nothing else. we later found out that it had all been delivered elsewhere because the recipient called us at home. debenhams couldnt even trace them.

eventually a week later these items turned up but that wasnt the end of it all.

debenhams had substituted items that had been ordered with other items on our list without informing or asking anyone. the reason according to them was the items are no longer being stocked.

our lovely £200 combi microwave arrived all nicely packaged with no dents in the box either. so after a few annoying phone calls and £10 compensation for the harrasement of chasing our items we headed off to germany to start our married life.

unpacking our microwave, once in our knew home we discovered a nasty dent in the top which travelled all along one side.

we contacted debenhams and told them. they told us they couldnt do anything because we had travelled to germany with it although the box is still in one piece and NO DENTS in the box. eventually after 3 different calls to 3 different numbers and people we have been told it was the last one and they will not be getting this type in anymore. we are still waiting for a call back from them to resolve this. in the defence of debenhams they did offer us a full refund but only on a debenhams card but as they are no longer stocking the oven we want i have refused this as being pointless. i am still fighting an upgrade or full refund. people need to be aware that debenhams are in the habit of changing stock items or discontinuing them without ANY notice at all, they even seem to advertise them for sale well after they have run out of stock.

watch this space for the result :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd never ordered from them previous to ordering these shorts - Figuring they're a half decent company I thought it would be the best place to go. Big mistake. They've still not replied to my letter - not long now before I can actually get Trading standards to sort it. Thing is... the blame lays at their door - they sent the wrong thing. Yet it's me that's suffering because of it. In hindesight maybe I should have gone in dstore to buy them - but the thing is... online or in a high street store - you should be able to expect the same level of service.

 

Good luck sorting out the claim... Not the best way to start a new life huh? :(

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No... but err why does that matter? They haven't sent me the refund for a product that came wrongly sized blah blah blah - you'd think... for the price of the shorts £25 they'd not be creating such an issue.

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

See - that's also confusing. The £3.50 I paid for the item to be delivered to me... they returned straight away. Odd don't you agree?

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol good way to put it

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Contacted Consumer Direct - they tld me to give Debenhams 14 days (and send them a formal letter) which I did. They never even bothered replying. tits!

 

Anyway Trading standards phoned me yesterday - and are now on their case :-) £25 may not be a lot... but it's MY money. Gits.

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...