Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • rather than reducing the levels of c02 and nox in the atmosphere A VERY large increase   Record-breaking increase in CO2 levels in world’s atmosphere | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Experts issue warning after finding global average concentration in March was 4.7ppm higher than same period last year Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...   Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...    
    • This is the info that I have. Name of seller... Thomas Stone. Reg LG51UOV Driven 109,000 2001 ford escort van 55 Price paid £500. (I know that that's stupidly cheap for a van, but my son wanted to take it apart, and put it to gether again) His address st margarates drive gillingham kent. We live swindon, so over 2 hours away. My oldest sons machanic inspected it . Sorry I don't know if I'm reading this right, but NSR wheel cylinder leaking NSR Shock mounting corroded  Rear cross member corroded  Rear number plate light missing Brake compressor valve seized Hand break cables insecure O/S Seal to floor repairs are very badly done Dash lights are painted out Bonnet ( This is all he wrote here.) Brake pipes are covered in black doodoo ( This is what the machanic wrote). My son asked Thomas Stone if it would need lots of work, for it to pass its next mot,  Thomas Stone said , " I can't see it needing mega amounts of work, for it to pass, it isn't rotten and it starts and drives ok, and the brakes work well".             
    • Alan Bates is in the Guardian today. Our Post Office victory is being twisted by those who don’t want to see its like again | Alan Bates | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Litigation funders didn’t ‘exploit’ subpostmasters, they helped us. Those who attack them have corporate interests at heart, says former subpostmaster...  
    • Discover 8 skills you develop when you explore different points of view that are essential for life and work.View the full article
    • Appreciate your response BankFodder. I am aware that the Consumer Rights Act does not apply in my case as I operate a business and, instead, should rely on the Supply of Goods and Services Act and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. I was a little unsure as, when I read the judgement of Hashim Farooq v EVRi Parcelnet, July 2023 I presumed that,  as Farooq had supplied laptops through Amazon,  the Consumer Rights Act would not apply but the judge refers to it in Section 22 as to why the claimant should be given judgment. Have I read this correctly? The reason for not offering full reimbursement was because I did not take out insurance for the full value.  In regards to correspondence from my customer,  I have emails from her in my timeline stating that she was waiting all week and that no one attempted delivery.  I have no doubt that she will be willing to corroborate the events with a written statement.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent need to defend CCJ from GE money RE: Burtons store card


will lliw
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5488 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all the wonderful folks on here! And apologies for posting before having a chance to read thoroughly about my situation. I am going to be spending the day savvying up on these wonderful forums but could do with a push in the right direction, since this is CCJ and the clock is ticking!

I might add that this is the first time ive had any dealings with CCJ and desperately don’t need this on my credit file!

On 30 Dec I received a claim from GE money for £1969.52, this is for the Burtons store card I once had. I have been paying an agreed reduced amount monthlyto CL Finance ltd but may have missed one or two payments. I am in possesion of a default notice or two also for this aco****.

I think I need to request a copy of my signed credit agreement and possibly all the info and statments GE money have. Is this correct and how would I do this? Also, what to do if I dont recieve by the CC deadline and even if I do how do I use them as a defence?

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Is it possible for you to scan your claim form, and post it on the site? If you do, please make sure that you blank out anything which will identify you personally.

 

It is vital to know exactly which documents are mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, as it affects the wording of the CPR request letters you will need to send.

 

Have a read of this thread

 

Can you also let us know the date the claim was issued against you. You have got 14 days from the date on the court claim in which to acknowledge service, if you wish to defend then you get a further 14+3 days in which to submit your defence

 

This thread is also worth a read to get a feel for the whole process.

Edited by DocH

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to defend this the first thing to do is to send this by recorded delivery to Cohens.

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

 

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the assignment

 

3 the default notice

 

Your client should ensure compliance with its CPR 31 duties and ensure that the documents I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully

 

 

You might find this thread of interest too - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/159445-getting-them-reveal-their.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42Man, thanks for your response its very much appreciated. I have the letter ready to go first thing in the morning. I’ve spent the afternoon reading and have a bit of a tension headache going on ATM!

 

I have also been looking through my files etc and it seems that I am in this position for missing 2 payments of which ive paid now but I think its to late. Do you think I should defend this or just concede and ask the court to set reasonable terms? I really do not want a CCJ and if I could turn the clock back a month I would have made more effort to ensure this got paid on time! I’m just worried about picking up more charges should I go ahead and defend.......

 

In addition ive scanned the copy’s I posses of the default notice (dated 1 Dec) and assignment. I actualy made my min agreed payment of £5.23 on 11th Dec, within 10 days of the default??? Is this grounds to defend the claim?

 

 

Default notice.doc

asignment.doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition ive scanned the copy’s I posses of the default notice (dated 1 Dec) and assignment. I actualy made my min agreed payment of £5.23 on 11th Dec, within 10 days of the default??? Is this grounds to defend the claim?

 

If you've only missed two payments then the arrears are surely only c£10. The Default Notice claims arrears of over £1800! I think your Default Notice may be defective, but would want one of the experts to take a look to confirm.

 

Looking at the Assignment letter it would appear the outstanding balance is c£1900, then the £1800 'arrears' is possibly the balance of the loan?

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've only missed two payments then the arrears are surely only c£10. The Default Notice claims arrears of over £1800! I think your Default Notice may be defective, but would want one of the experts to take a look to confirm.

 

Looking at the Assignment letter it would appear the outstanding balance is c£1900, then the £1800 'arrears' is possibly the balance of the loan?

 

Yeah, I got my knickers twisted there a bit earlier sorry. The total debt is currently £1800, was £1900 at the time of asignment but £100 has been paid off by making my agreed monthly payments of £5.23. However i need to look into the total owed soon because its riddled with unfair charges im sure.

 

The default is for the full amount of £1800 and i only paid the min agreed payment of £5.23 within 10 days as i dont have £1800 to splash around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've only missed two payments then the arrears are surely only c£10. The Default Notice claims arrears of over £1800! I think your Default Notice may be defective, but would want one of the experts to take a look to confirm.

 

Looking at the Assignment letter it would appear the outstanding balance is c£1900, then the £1800 'arrears' is possibly the balance of the loan?

 

Well as the payments clause in GE,s agreemants is 4 or 5 % of the outstanding ballence, and i believe they are refering to those, as they appear to be doing with mine, thats a lot of missed payment to have £1802.52 arears.

So i would say it is very unclear what you have breached, and they seem to be confused in what they require to rectify it, they say arears but thats the outstanding ballence.

I doubt this would be valid too

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

will lliw have you signed anything with CL at all regarding this account and payments? if not what agreement are they refering too?

 

 

I have not signed a thing for CL, they are refering to the agreement I made with GE to make a reduced monthly payment of £5.23 due to financial difficultys. CL always have said they would honour it and they did untill i missed a payment. I dont know if its important but i did sign the letter i sent to GE asking them to accept a reduced payment of £5.23, this was obviously before the debt was asigned to CL.

Edited by will lliw
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here's the thing, whith my case GE issued a default notice before demanding the full amount, then they sold it to CL.

 

Did you go through that with GE first, did GE at any time demand full payment of the account after issueing a default notice of there own?

Link to post
Share on other sites

YEs!!! Ive just checked through my paperwork and found a default notice from GE before they sold to CL, requsting arears of £49.37 be paid or they will set the dogs on me, is this significant bat? Will scan and post if needed....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its worth checking that one too

 

Also Did you pay the amount requested by that default within the time frame set by it?

 

And did GE, or Viking ever issue a letter saying the had terminated the agreemant if not, or demand full payment

 

ive got alot of demands form viking for the full amount then it goes back to GE before GE sell to CL. Viking didnt issue any defaults but ive got letters saying things like you have 48 hours to pay etc....

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive got alot of demands form viking for the full amount then it goes back to GE before GE sell to CL. Viking didnt issue any defaults but ive got letters saying things like you have 48 hours to pay etc....

 

Yep same pattern as me then, now i need someone to confirm this but, i believe if they demand full payment that then means they have terminated the agreemant, but forgot to tell you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

will lliw remove yor link to your claim form in post 3, you have left something on it, will explain when you have removed it

 

You'll have to change your user name now :D Well spotted

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep same pattern as me then, now i need someone to confirm this but, i believe if they demand full payment that then means they have terminated the agreemant, but forgot to tell you.

 

Seems to fit the bill as posted in surfaceagentx20's http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/170345-tale-dodgy-dn.html thread.

 

Could really do with PT or x20's advice here.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done! What did i miss?

 

You left your password for the claim showing.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...