Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Gollie v Halifax ***SETTLED IN FULL****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Fine - send it to;

 

HBOS Legal Service - Retail Division

Trinity Road

Halifax

West Yorkshire

HX1 2RG

 

If they don't stop these charges, include them in the claim

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ALSO - 3 threads merged in relation to this Halifax claim.

Please do not start separate threads for every query.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine - send it to;

 

HBOS Legal Service - Retail Division

Trinity Road

Halifax

West Yorkshire

HX1 2RG

 

If they don't stop these charges, include them in the claim

 

Ok i will send that letter to that address, as opposed tot aking it to branch and getting a receipt. How come its better to send it to that address rather than the branch do they have a higher power to refund the charges etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok finalised letter due to be sent out first class tomorrow, not sure wether to do it recorded or not

 

**********

**********

*****

 

Trinity Road

Halifax

West Yorkshire

HX1 2RG

 

18TH August 2006

 

SORT CODE: ********

ACCOUNT NUMBER: ********

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I have previously contacted yourselves regarding unlawful charges that were applied to my account summing a total of £150. Since then however there have been more charges applied to my account, which has led me to revise my claim as stated in my previous letters.

 

There were two charges applied to my account. One charge of £118 was applied on 31st July 2006 and another charge of £30 applied on the 3rd August 2006. This has led me to revise my claim, increasing the total amount to £298.00.

 

There are also two more charges totalling an additional £60 to be deducted from my account on the 23rd August 2006. If these charges are applied to my account then I will once again be revising my claim to cover for the additional unlawful charges.

 

As a courtesy, I am willing to give yourselves to the 24th August 2006 before I issue my claim to the County Court. If you do not comply fully before that date then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

To clarify: If I have not received a full refund totalling £298.00 before the 24th August 2006 then on the 25th August 2006 I will be filing a claim for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice. In addition to the £298.00 if any other charges are applied to my account before the 25th August then I will revise my claim to include the additional charges. This includes the charges due to come out on the 23rd August 2006 for £60.

 

As I have stated in my previous letter, I shall also submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit license under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

If you have any correspondence you wish to send to me regarding this matter then can you please send it to the below address as access to my previous address is unavailable for the next three weeks.

 

********

********

***

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your question

 

You are about to begin/are suggesting there is a possibility of,legal action against your bank therefore you must send recorded so that you have proof of both posting and delivery.

 

Secondly,as legal action threats cannot be dealt with at branch level,it would be forwarded to customer relations anyway,so its much easier for you to send it to H.O.

 

Letter is clear enough.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok i sent that letter 7 days ago and still no response will be filing for a claim tomorrow. Now however i went the house that halifax has my original address for and there is a letter dated 14th August offering me £150 when the claim had been revised to £298. Since i did not know it was there i didnt respond and just carried on with the next letter saying they have a further 7 days. There letter offering £150 also states that "they reserve the right to close your account if you do not manage it correctly."

 

Should i just carry on with filing for a claim or do i need to respond to that letter. Whats the best step for me now.

 

The full claim now is £358.00 with a further £30 due to come out tomorrow and probably another £60 within a week. Should i send them a letter refusing the £150.00 for the claim of £358.00 even tho when they offered it was only £298.00. Or should i send them a letter stating that i refuse the offer for £150.00 for the £298.00 and remind them that my claimhas been changed to now £358.00.

 

I wanted to give the bank the chance to refund it out of court should i give them another chance reiterate that it is now £358.00 with further charges to come out and im not prepared to accept £150. I was going to jsut send them a letter saying that and tell them that i will be filing for a claim with immediate effect.

 

Any help appreciated thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't bother replying to their letter. If you hold off filing for a week you can include the new charges and file a claim for £448.

Yes what I cant decide whats best to do. Wether to send this letter.

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

I have recently received a letter offering me £150.00 of my total claim of £298.00. However I would like to reiterate that I will be requiring the charges in full and therefore I am declining this offer.

 

I would also like to remind yourselves that there have been two more charges applied to my account one for £30 on the 21st August 2006 and another for £30 on the 22nd August. This has led me to revise my claim now to £358.00

 

As a courtesy, I am willing to give yourselves a further 7 days before I issue my claim to the County Court. If you do not comply fully before that date then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

To clarify: If I have not received a full refund totaling £358.00 before the 5th September 2006 then I will be filing a claim for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice. In addition to the £358.00 if any other charges are applied my account before this matter is settled then I will revise my claim to include the additional charges.

 

As I have stated in my previous letters, I shall also submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit license under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

If you have any correspondence you wish to send to me regarding this matter then can you please send it to the below address as access to my previous address is unavailable for the next three weeks.

 

********

*******

****

 

 

Yours Sincerely

Or to just wait a week and ALL charges will of been applied then i can just claim for the lot and get it all sorted at once.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks mate thats what im going to do, im going to file for a claim next week when all the charges are out. Will the fact that ive told the bank i will be filing on the 25h august and i wont be til around the 5th september make any difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your help and advice so far very helpful.

 

 

My next step is basically to file for a claim. Will be doing so next week!! I have worked it out and at the moment I will be claiming for 388 Pound. Plus interest which is 3.71.

 

There are more charges comingout next week so i am not touching my account until every charge has come out so i can work it all out again just to make sure i ahve it all correct and then i will be filing for everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date a/c opened)conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00 = amount of charges claimed) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date of 1st charge) to (Date of filing claim) of (£0.00 =The interest in the 8% spreadsheet calculation) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00p = Amount of charges claimed x 0.00022).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date a/c opened)conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00 = amount of charges claimed) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date of 1st charge) to (Date of filing claim) of (£0.00 =The interest in the 8% spreadsheet calculation) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00p = Amount of charges claimed x 0.00022).

 

Thanks mate! I am not going to file for interest because its only since june and its only worth something like 2.90. Should i leave the bit if highlighted out because of this? Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I still havent filed for this claim yet. Totally forgot all about it.

 

It charges now stand at £569.81 that includes interest. If i file tomorrow for the claim will i have any problems because ive left it a month later than scheduled partly due to not getting paid last month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its 8 weeks before the bank considers case closed so you should be ok.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ok i have not stuck to my guidelines purely because when its come to filing for a claim i just havent had the money. But im going to send this letter again before a file for a claim. Can anyone see any problems or recommend anything thanks alot.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

I have previously contacted yourselves regarding unlawful charges that were applied to my account. Since then however there have been more charges applied to my account which have led for me to revise my claim as stated in my previous letter to £714.00.

 

I previously spoke to an agent regarding this matter and was told sometimes it can take up to 8 weeks for yourselves to reply to these matters. So to give yourselves time to review my charges and the law, I decided to wait until the 8 weeks was up before issuing my claim at the county court.

 

I now feel as though I have given Halifax Bank long enough to refund me the money that is rightfully mine. I will now be proceeding with a court claim unless my money has been refunded into my account within 7 days from the date of the above letter. If any other charges are applied to my account before this matter is settled then I will revise my claim to cover any additional unlawful charges.

 

To clarify: If I have not received a full refund totaling £714.00 before 3rd November 2006 then I will be filing a claim for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice. In addition to the £714.00 if any other charges are applied to my account before this matter is settled then I will revise my claim to include the additional charges.

 

As I have stated in my previous letters, I shall also submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit license under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

If you have any correspondence you wish to send to me regarding this matter then can you please send it to the below address as access to my previous address is unavailable for the next three weeks.

 

 

*****

*****

****

 

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am perhaps not the best qualified person to help but can I ask what this letter is about? Is this after your LBA?

 

I think you need to pull your finger out because you are making threats to the bank and not sticking to them - This is exactly how the bank want you to act.... I filed my MCOL on Sat even though the deadline I set was Friday. The bank say they will consider the case closed after a period of 8 weeks so you really should just file the MCOL. Once you get into the mindset of 'i'll do it tomorrow, it usually never gets done' (from personal experience)

 

Have you also read the FAQs? They are there for a reason and if you are serious about getting your money back you should have read them thoroughly.

I Already had statements for past 6 years so no need to send request for statements.

 

23rd Sept 2006 - Sent first letter for £238

 

04th Oct 2006 - Bog standard reply letter recieved from Halifax

 

13th Oct 2006 - Sent LBA (gave 14 days to reply)

 

20th Oct 2006 - Phone call from Halifax offering £70

 

21 Oct 2006 - Offered £70 as 'goodwill gesture'

 

23 Oct 2006 - Accepted offer as Part settlement of claim

 

28 Oct 2006 - Filed MCOL

03 Nov 06 - Recieved letter offereing to increase goodwill offer to £120

 

21 Nov 06 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am perhaps not the best qualified person to help but can I ask what this letter is about? Is this after your LBA?

 

I think you need to pull your finger out because you are making threats to the bank and not sticking to them - This is exactly how the bank want you to act.... I filed my MCOL on Sat even though the deadline I set was Friday. The bank say they will consider the case closed after a period of 8 weeks so you really should just file the MCOL. Once you get into the mindset of 'i'll do it tomorrow, it usually never gets done' (from personal experience)

 

Have you also read the FAQs? They are there for a reason and if you are serious about getting your money back you should have read them thoroughly.

 

Thanks for your help, i have read the FAQS. The threat i made was if i havent recieved the money i will file for a claim. But i could not file for a claim because i did not have the money. I have the money now and i am ready to file. But i was just checking if anyone else thinks i should either send the bank a letter just letting them know that i am filing for a claim as i gave them 8 weeks to reply and have still heard nothing. Or if i should just file for a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gollie,

 

File the money claim online claim today. You are acting in precisely the way the bank want you to do by not going to court.

 

At the moment letters mean nothing to the bank and the financial ombusman is a red herring with these charges.

 

Take it to court and you WILL get your money back - even before a hearing. they may file a defence but this is standard procedure these days and they will usually end up dragging it out to the last minute but they will not defend it.

 

They will certainly try dragging it on if you seem to be fannying around.

 

Write letters threatening court and you WILL be ignored.

 

Action speaks louder than words!!

 

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...