Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car being held by Garage


HypnoBliss
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All ,

This is a long post but wonder if someone can help me. I have searched through the other posts but didn't see anything relevant.

My car (Audi A4) started making a horrible noise and I took it to my Audi dealer. They looked at it and said it needed an new engine. AS this would cost £3000 (including labour) and the car itself was only worth £2000 they advised it wouldn't be worth doing. They said I could get a garage to fit a second hand engine which would reduce the cost by half but that they could only fit a new one.

Anyway the car broke down a day later and got it towed home by the RAC.

I then phoned around and got several quotes and chose the most reasonable (though not the cheapest) one. They said they would replace the engine and re-service the car for £1550 all in. They said they would pick up the car and return it free of charge and would have it done within a week. So I made the appointment and asked for the quote to be sent by email.

 

By the day of collection I didn't receive the email but was promised it would be sent shortly. The person who picked it up didn't have any ID or a collection note but as he came on the right day I assumed it was OK.

 

The next day I checked that it was there and was told yes and that someone would get back to me. They then phoned the next day and said that they had looked at the car and that it would be £3500!! to fix due to a myriad of other things which were now wrong with the car. I told them that if that was the case I did not want the work carried out as that was more than the car was worth.

I was then told that I would have to pay £350 for work already carried out and £150 for pick up and delivery of the car + they would not put the engine back in unless further monies were paid.

 

When I refused stating that I was not told about the £350 charge and that I was told the Pick up and collection was free he said that if I did not pay by 16:00 that day he would dump my car on the road where it would be picked up by the police and I would face charges.

 

When I called the next day he first said that the car had been dumped on the road and that "he hadn't seen it today so 'pikies' must have taken it "

I then said I would inform the police and put the phone down. He then rang back and said he was only joking and that he still had the car but I would be getting it back until I had paid the £500. Additionally he would be charging £10 per day storage costs.

I replied via email disputing the costs and stating that I would pick up my car but they just replied saying I had to pay before the car would be released.

Am I liable to pay for any of these costs even though I have not signed anything? - They have since said it's in the T&C's on their website but I was quoted over the phone and was NOT told of this.

Can a garage hold my car without my permission?

Can they charge me these ongoing storage costs?

 

Apologies again for the long post and thanks in advance for any help anyone can give.

Edited by HypnoBliss
Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically if you have agreed to some work being done without a final quote or price agrred then it is normal to pay for what they have done on a fair and reasonable basis which must be justified i.e. time spent X rate etc. Quantm meruit is the term. however as is most likely you will not agree, but you want the car back, so the practical way is pay up and and claim any unreasonable costs back through the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, if it is HEC, then he has zero chance of getting his money back. Also, they pull this trick everytime. As I said, have a look for the company on the web and you will see what you are dealing with. I wish you good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

just looked at there website and it says they are wanting to sell or rent the web domain. It may be worth someone buying it and slating the company, or would that be bad??

 

Moneysupermarket forum has lots on these guys. It appears some reals bad ones. Do a mass protest outside there place and get the local press to meet you there. That would create a decent human interest story. That way whatever name they use, people will know where they are.

 

Derek

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

The company is based in Heathrow but they have called themselves 'Engine warehouse' or 'reconditioned- engines' (Reconditioned Engines. Rebuilt Engines. Remanufactured Engines.)

I believe they have just changed their name.

 

Frankly I don't want the car back now anyway, just want to make sure they can't try to sue me for any money.

They obviously won't give it back. Should I report it stolen?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

As I said before, the Company is Heathrow Engine Centre and if you check the internet you will get some idea of who you are dealing with.

 

Don't report it stolen, as it isn't. I'd be very tempted to say to the DVLA that I had scrapped the vehicle or send them the log book.

 

I don't know whether they will come after you for any money - have you signed anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I haven't signed anything. Not even a collection notice. Which on reflection is a good thing as if they do try to come after me for the money, they have no proof of any agreement for work (however tenuous!).

 

So I can't report it Stolen and I can't log it as scrapped with the DVLA. Where does that leave me? Do I just forget about it & write it off as a lesson learned?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. You say the car is worth £2000? How old is it and exactly which model? If it really is worth £2000 then it would have a value even with the engine broken. It would be best to get the car back. Have you asked exactly how the £350 breaks down?

It is interesting that the Audi Main Agent wanted £3000 to replace the engine, whilst these cowboys want £3500.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi gwc1000 its a A4 quattro sport W reg (2000). 2000/W Audi A4 Saloon 1.8 T quattro Sport 4d Valuation - Parker's

 

They said the £350 was for standard investigative work and wouldn't break it down any further. and have added £150 for pick up and delivery.

Edited by HypnoBliss
added valuation
Link to post
Share on other sites

Without knowing much I would advise you to go to your local citizens advice who will be able to either advise you put you in touch with a solictor to take on the matter or may even be able to phone the company and put the scares on them

 

Either way this situation your in isnt right and there bound to be something you can do and somebody to help you just got to find it and you certainly shouldnt let these people get away with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

could somebody else just check but it seems these people are a sponsered link of google ?,

 

What they are charging is what they say in their terms anc conditions but since they never told you about any terms and conditions and you never agreed to any terms and conditions and couldnt have possibly know about any, then you should have a good case, trading standards sound like a good bet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without knowing much I would advise you to go to your local citizens advice who will be able to either advise you put you in touch with a solictor to take on the matter or may even be able to phone the company and put the scares on them

 

 

You don't put the 'scares' on HEC. They have been doing this since time imemorial. I remember a big hoo ha with them and the Exchange and Mart decades ago, can't remember if it went to court or not but if it did it hasn't made any difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from another thread about "Car at Garage for 5 weeks now garage appears to have shut up shop" not the same i know maybe worth a try but someone suggested a good reply to that

 

" what does your ins co. say or offer

after a few unanswered letters from their legal team

i know someone that had the same sort of scenario a couple of years ago,

ins co, paid for a locksmith to break-in [police were present too] and recovered the car [though it was a £24k range-rover!].

notice of recovery [or something] was left at the premises, he never heard another thing about it.

 

as you are AA too what do they say, both have legal teams that you can use and might even be free.

 

just athought..

 

dx100uk"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gwc1000 its a A4 quattro sport W reg (2000). 2000/W Audi A4 Saloon 1.8 T quattro Sport 4d Valuation - Parker's

 

They said the £350 was for standard investigative work and wouldn't break it down any further. and have added £150 for pick up and delivery.

 

 

did you ask them to fit you a new engine or to repair the one thats in the car? if you just asked for a new engine fitted then they shouldnt have been investigating what the damage to the engine was.

 

so if you just said fit me a new engine ect then you should be asking why they have been investigating the engine damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to the DVLA and say that a garage is holding your car without your consent and that you are currently in dispute with them over release fees.

 

Explain that as you are still the legal owner of the car, you do not give permission for anyone else to sell the car, register the car in their name or scrap the car without your express permission.

 

I believe the DVLA will then put a security marker on the vehicle so that if anyone tries to re-register the car or does an HPI check, they will be warned off.

 

Then, write to the company (not via email) and send it recorded delivery saying that you dispute the costs they are trying to charge as you originally had a verbal agreement for a lesser amount. Explain that you did not give them permission to carry out this particular work and that they must put the car back how it was when it arrived in their workshop. Explain that you do not give them permission to sell, scrap or re-register the car and that they have a duty of care to look after your car until the dispute is resolved. End the letter by saying that if you do not get a satisfactory resolution, you will seek small claims court action for a possession order.

 

If you do not get the issue resolved to your satisfaction, file a small claims court action online - www.moneyclaim.gov.uk . You can either try to sue for the cost of replacing the car, or perhaps more appropriately, apply for a possession order. I think it costs about £150 and if you win (probably by default as they wont turn up) take the order to your local Police and ask them to accompany you to the site in a 'keeping the peace' role in order to help you retrieve the car.

 

I think you have a fight on your hands and it will ultimately cost you court fees to resolve but if I were you, I'd rather give my cash to the court than these local thieves. I would also stongly recommend you report them to your local Trading Standards and the Police as it is quite clearly a nice fraud they have set up. You may well need to be quite persistent with the Police that it is a fraud you are reporting.

 

Good luck, keep us informed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hey. well the garage have the right to keep ur car until you dont pay and some garages do charge for storage. and the noise is it only when ur starting the car?? if yes then its most likely the starter which makes a funny noise. i have done quite a few with noisey starters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Won't fly. You can only declare scrapped if you personally dismantle the vehicle.

 

 

Sorry if I'm talking out of term here but I registered my Mondeo as scrapped five years ago and I didn't personally dismantle the vehicle as the garage I had taken it to offered to do that without charge. Don't know if that is sort of the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...