Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax - Old Mortgage Account - Help Required Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think with most people it starts off with being a few pence overdrawn, so you get a charge and then a 28 overlimit fee which isn't applied until the end of the month. I am on a set budget, so that is 58 quid from next months bills & mortage budget. The 28 quid then takes you over your limit again so another charge. Then by the following month, you are worse off, so maybe a direct debit will bounce and hey presto, more charges. If you then try to call the Halifax for an overdraft to try and be sensible, they will tell you you can't have an overdraft unless your account has been charge free for 3 months, which is helpful!! Then maybe a direct debit will be returned, so mare charges, and maybe a fee from the company trying to get their money and it seems a big hole opens up and swallows you!

 

I have quite a healthy salary going in my account and was embarrassed by the amount of charges I had clocked up in 3.5 years (£1800), but from reading on this site, it is by no means unusual and the banks want to do very little in terms of helping you get out of the spiral, and why would they I suppose when they know they can charge more or less what they want each month!!

  • Haha 1

Springer :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I'm totally with you on that one Springer the money is there for the DD but the apply a charge and then the money aint there oh that will be another charge to come out

01/09/2006 Data Protection Act sent

04/09/2006 Data Protection Act recieved by Halifax

28/09/2006 Called Halifax to see if they have done anything about Data Protection Act letter

17/10/2006 Non Compliance LBA sent

23/10/2006 Phone call made

24/10/2006 statements arrived

24/10/2006 prelim letter sent asking for return of £1455.87

08/11/2006 LBA sent ;) court next :p

14/11/2006 good will gesture made offered £513 now claiming £1639.95 :D

15/12/2006 Court claim number Halifax must respond by 23/01/2007

 

05/01/2007 PAID IN FULL WOOHOO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding DD's, I used to pay my bills by cash or standing order.

Over the years, I gradually gave in to pressure to pay by DD.

Why did the goverment issue all those ads telling the country to pay by DD?

I chose cash & standing order because it meant that I could dictate when I paid, the amount I paid and the date that the payment was made.

In other words,I had control of my budget.

 

A DD can be taken from your account up to 3 weeks before and after your aranged payment date.

The amount can vary, for example when Mortgage interest rates change.

So, from being in control of your budget, you hand over control to whoever you are paying.

You cannot control your budget unless you have at least one months total budget payments in a separate account used only for bill payments.

You can't set this up whilst the banks and others continually fleece you!

It is in their interests for your account to get into trouble.

In the offer of partial seetlement sent to me by the Halifax, they stated that it was my responsibility to manage ny account properly.

I did this for years until they started to treat it as a source of income for them.

And, of course the banks just love it. It is most definately a significant source of revenue for them.

 

I have several claims ready to go. I'll start them once I have proof - i.e. money! - that it works via my Halifax claim.

 

After which I will insist that I once again pay by cash or S.O.

 

Institutions should not be able to dictate methods of payment.

If they are being paid, that should be sufficient.

 

There.... that's my rant for the day!

09/10/06:Halifax claims opened with prelims

claim 1 = 1392.38

claim 2 = 1437.74

claim 3 = 1480.76

claim 4 = 0185.32

Changed tactics.

1 claim of £4600 submitted - will travel to england to go to court if required.

 

27/10/06: LBA sent

01/11/06: Recieved an offer of £764

05/11/06: Refusal of offer sent

11.11.06: MCOL submitted

13.11.06: MCOL issued

16.11.06: MCOL aknowledged

17.11.06: recieved withdrawal of offer letter - too late, it's already with court!

27.11.06: recieved written confirmation from Northampton County Court. Still no correspondance from Halifax. They have until 15/12/06 to respond.

O1/12/06: Settled in full, including interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I also took out a Leeds mortgage in 1989 redeemed in November 1999 sent

Sars request 13/01 with £10.00 crossed postal order. no response whatsoever. Sent 2nd request ( as they were adamant they never received the original!)22/02- still no response! ,phoned last week - 5th call- finally got really helpful lady who told me original was received on 15/01!! Also told me I had a tie in with another mortgage( interesting as my current mortgage is with Birmingham Midshires, and I,m at the 2nd offer stage with them!) I pointed out that they were already in breach, and when was I likely to receive the statements- also mortgage exit fee refund. Was told 'probably the end of the week'. needless to say nothing at all, other than a cheque for £10 refunding the 2nd SAR fee I sent needlessly. Any sugestions what I can do next? I have no ideas what fees were applied to the account, other than the fact that they were hefty due to 2 yrs ill health. Help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

well 6 months down the line, and after involving both the Information Commisioner and Financial Ombudsman have finally got statements from old Leeds account and Halifax- does anyone out there know what the Leeds charges were please for letters and telephone calls? I,m really struggling to make sense of what they,ve ( finally) sent me. HELP!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...