Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So who did you pay for the few months energy used before you switched to BG ?  OVO ? 
    • I moved in November 2018. The date they have got is the 10/10/2018 (that's the date it says the agreement was entered into in the letter before claim). I have no idea what period the money owed covers. 
    • Irrelevant if its not in their particulars. Look the crux of the defence is that you are being billed for energy (most probably daily Standing Charge amount) after the previous owner left. So you want proof and dates from the claimant that pin points this debt was incurred by yourself after you took residence. Now we can throw in the the standard legal jargon that puts them to proof. The claimant is an assignee who bought the debt for pence from SSE/OVO they haven't a clue how it was incurred or by who and possibly wont have any paperwork to back up their pleadings. What did did you take residence...what dates are on the charge from when and to ?
    • Notify them of your new address when you move yes.  You should do this with all your creditors and twice with the DVLA (once for licence, other for car V5C) Limitation period is 6 years for private cases.  Don't worry about a CCJ. They're a punishment from the court. For that you'd have to: Get a letter of Claim. Ignore that and get a formal claimform. Either not defend, not meet directions or go to a court hearing and lose (highly unlikely when following the advice here) Get judgement awarded against you Ignore this and not pay in full within 30 days. Only once all that has happened is a CCJ registered against you.  
    • Yes, you should tell them by snail mail if you move, just don't give them your email address. I think they have six years to pursue this, hopefully they won't. HB
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

14 Services -Private Parking Ticket- Do I pay???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5217 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

no PPC (private parking company) can actually issue a real parking ticket

 

they use the term PCN , which is a real Council term, to hoodwink in to beliving its actually a real parking ticked , they are not , they have tried to getting round it by saying its actually a parking charge notice a play on words

 

Its a [problem], what it actually is an Un-enforceable invoice on the the pretense you enterered into a contract with them by driving onto the private land and will claim their were notices etc, but because its so hard to prove you actually agreed to the contract, they avoid going to court , because its been declared an Un-enforcable invoice, and so many have lost in court when they tried.

 

google excel parking make's good bedtime reading

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

so this is basic contract law; there is no contract as there is no consideration, and acceptance of their offer to enter into one ( i.e driving into the car park) in itself is doubtful- am i right in thinking this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was also taken to court by a 14 services and ordered to pay £200... but then i had 6 tickets....

Did you defend the case?

What was the circumstances of the 'winning' against you?

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so this is basic contract law; there is no contract as there is no consideration, and acceptance of their offer to enter into one ( i.e driving into the car park) in itself is doubtful- am i right in thinking this?

They are assuming that the Registered Keeper was the driver who allegedly entered into their contract.

Also, the sum they claim usually far exceeds their or the landowners actual loss so could be called a penalty.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The space I parked in is allocated to me; am not sure wat their loss would be anyway. Is me driving into the car park enough to infer that I accepted a contract with them though?

 

Dont believe a word of the contract mumbo jumbo, theyve changed their signs so manytimes its unreal. Its your space allocated to you not a court in the land would uphold a thing they say. It makes me laugh when they quote things like the "car parking association has agreed that "or similar. When you look into it, its george and his misses liz aka eva perone who made it up.,

 

Trust me dont worry about it, dont pay a penny and if they keep harassing you go to the person who allocated the site and say youre not happy. i bet they dont know about who theyre employing.

 

Bottom line dont pay a thing and george has had the police at his door too many times to be a further nuisance

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the building manager and they said they've had a few similar complaints about the way these idiots have been treating residents, but that they cannot get involved, other than to reassess whether they will continue to employ them.

 

Looks like they won't be around for much longer which is a small mercy.

 

I refuse to be bullied by these imbeciles, so roll on ignoring them!

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to 14 Services -Private Parking Ticket- Do I pay???
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...