Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is it possible for a company to call someone on the phone


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5656 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a telephone call from British gas, they said is this Mr MYNAME, I said maybe, how can I help, they said they were from British gas and they need to settle my last bill because I have moved supplier and can they have my credit card details, they went on telling me how much it was and that they needed payment today to avoid legal steps being taken.

 

I told them to send me a bill in the post and I will settle it when I get it, he again said I need payment today because if he issues a bill it will take 5 to 10 days to get here and he cant guarantee that legal proceeding will not be taken in that time.

 

I said if you think I am going to give my credit card details to a random person who rings me on the phone you are very much mistaken, he then said I can prove to you that I am British gas and starting spouting all my past payment and personal details, I then told him that you have just rung a telephone number and you have not confirmed who the other person is and you give this person all my personal information, does the data protection act not apply to British Gas.

 

I said send me a bill and I will settle it when I receive it, he insisted on getting my credit card details there and then, I repeated that I do not give my credit card details to anyone especially someone who has no respect for the data protection act.

 

I told him again to send a bill and he just went over the same routine, he needs it now, I repeated my spiel about giving my details over the phone, I went around in this loop about 3 or 4 times and decided to cut him off.

 

I have transferred from BG because they are carp, I am sure I need to settle the outstanding amount, but I want a bill to see exactly what I am paying, I will never give my card details to anyone who rings me over the phone.

 

If someone rings me is confirming my name enough to satisfy the data protection act (even though I didn't confirm my name in this instance)? some companies ring up and ask personal questions to confirm that I am who I say I am, I always say that I am not prepared to give my personal information to random callers, and ask them for personal information about me to confirm that I know who they are, they never do (Except BG in this instance), if this is the case neither party can confirm who they are without breaking the data protection act rules or myself giving personal information which I am not prepared to do for basic security reasons, so therefore the call can not take place.

 

I am expecting the usual threats of immediate payment or death by harrasment and quite happy to deal with iit until I get a breakdown of the charge and I get enough money to pay it.

 

This was with BG in this instance but could equally be any other supplier or DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone rings me is confirming my name enough to satisfy the data protection act

No it certainly isn't. I would make an official complaint in writing to British Gas. If they don't deal with it to your satisfaction you can then get the Energy Obudsman involved. I would also make a complaint to the ICO and the OFT.

 

As you say this could have been anyone who had got hold of your details. You are also entitled to a bill - otherwise how do you know what you are paying for and that it is the correct amount.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like a [problem] to me.

You always get a final bill when changing power supplies. you did the right thing by not giving out your details, Im sure I heard something about this on watch dog a few weeks ago about [problematic] calling for your card details and demanding you pay your bill before they get the debt collectors in, how they do this is beyond me but im sure if there is a will there is a way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And how is a company (or individual) meant to collect money they are entitled to if a customer does not pay after receiving written correspondence? Phoning customers chasing overdue payments must have been done ever since telephones were invented and there is nothing wrong in it. Court action can be an extremely costly process that many small companies probably cannot afford - should they then just let the customer get away with not paying, meaning everyone else has to pay more because of bad debts the company has incurred. The idea that you shouldn;t contact your customers by phone is claptrap.

That is not to say that British Gas are in the right here. Clearly they can't expect to be paid if they haven't even sent a bill out yet and they should not force a customer to pay specifically by card over the telephone. Why not just tell them you won't pay anthing until you have got a correct bill from them. If they do decide to take legal action without doing this first, they will only end up with egg on their face anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And how is a company (or individual) meant to collect money they are entitled to if a customer does not pay after receiving written correspondence?

There are very clear guidelines on how you go about it. There is also statute to protect individuals from harassment and fraud. The OP has received no written correspondence regarding a bill. The person phoning has broken the Data Protection Act and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations.

 

I fail to see the point of your post, assuming of course that there was one.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company IS entitled to pursue the debt, but given that they haven't sent a final bill strictly speaking there is no debt.

 

Also if this person does work for BG (which the divulged information suggest) they have totally failed to safeguard this customers data. It is fortunate indeed that they were speaking to the customer, what if someone else had answered and they started talking about a debit balance?

 

Definately complain about this it is not acceptable behaviour and also this reduces the chance of the same thing happening to others. Given all power suppliers shocking level of customer service I certainly would not pay a final bill until I was CERTAIN it was correct.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sent a reply to my complaint.

 

Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding the call you received from us.

I confirm the call made to you on 4 December 2008 was a legitimate member of staff from our payments department. May I take this opportunity to apologise for the manner of my colleague; we aim to be friendly and professional to all customers at all times.

As requested we have sent a copy of the final bill and this will be with you in the next three working days.

 

The reason I changed from British Gas is because this was a similar attitude that their customer service staff gave when I contacted them before.

 

I was short of cash 1 month and asked if I could delay payment by a month until I had some more money, they said there is nothing they could do and I must pay now, I put in a complaint then because the customer Services staff made me feel like I was a criminal and that I had a cheek even asking for a bit of time to pay.

 

I had my gas with Eon and asked them if I could have some time to pay and they authorised some extra time immediately, I have electricity and gas with Eon now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...