Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bryan Carter CCJ can anyone help??


vikki75
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

We have today recieved the letter from BC offering us payment of £150. The also sent a further letter with the points of disupte enclosed.

Basically they are disputing the amount claimed and the time that was spent as well as the fact the the points of claim were redily found on the internet and were not case specific. They also say that we did not offer a vailed defence and they deem that the costs are excessive.

Any advice on what we shoud do now and how much it will cost for us to defend him in court woudl be appreciated.

Vikki

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact the the points of claim were redily found on the internet and were not case specific

They are also readily found in law books so does that mean you can't use them either?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Iwonder if the credit cruch is affecting Carter? I'd be tempted to write back and suggest to Bri that because there's a dispute you'd be happy to allow a judge to hear argumernts for and against and then decide. Of course te judge would be told how the matter came before a court.... I'll bet he wouldn't like that at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the N252 gives a min. of 21 days from Carter receiving it..

I would be tempted to take the offer, as I bet good old Bryan will hate to cough up.

On the other hand I debt he would want to go to court, so it may be worth giving him a chance to up his offer.

I don’t know what you do about going to court but I guess you just send the bill of costs and N252 to the court that was dealing with the case. I would ring the court for clarification.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its your call no-one is going to say anything one way or the other, the fact you have made carters pay, is payment in itself, that said carter is talking nonsense in the letter,

 

You must have filed a valid defence otherwise why would carter fold.

 

The fact that did your research on the internet is irrelevant as you had to verify everything before you used it anyway

 

£9.25 per hour is the going rate for LIPs, carter should think himself lucky you didn't instruct a barrister, then he would have had something to worry about.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have no idea Vicky, but I would ring the court,

Why would they send the money to court? The only reason I could think of is to show the court they had paid, but surely the court don't except these payments, they have enough to do,

I wouldn't of thought paying out costs to people on a solicitors behalf would be something the court did.

 

What reason did carters have for sending payment to the court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Vicki, I told you you'd beat this creep.

 

I think you should have submitted a wasted costs order to the Court and not asked BC direct (I may be wrong) I'll get PT to have a look in.

 

It matters JOT where you got your defence from, its the time spent researching it. REMEMBER, you have won, he's on the back foot, peddling backwards.

 

And also remember, whoever is dealing with the debt, they can't reissue it without leave from the court. So it's dead and buried ;)

 

 

Well done you x x x x

 

 

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we recieved the cheque this morning, slight problem as they had spelt our names wrong on it so the bank would not accept it!!. I have been in touch with BC and they have told me they will re issue the cheque when they recieve the other one back.

It means more messing about and more expense but hopefully by monday it will be sorted out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that is what I thought! They were very happy that I accepted the offer though lol. To be honest if i didnt need to pay off the rent arrears I would have told them no and took them to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...