Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok it's defence week, I need to upload 2 pics of the letters from overdales from my phone to put on here to be checked so I can file my defence. Cheers H
    • Today as the registered keeper of the vehicle photographed, I received a Parking Charge Notice, for a private land car park. I have looked at streetview and I dont think the signs are noticable, they were not placed on entry to the parking area, but on lamposts around the plot. It's not ANPR monitored but must've had someone on foot as they had photo of the vehicle parked in a bay. Is this one worth contesting or will it have to be paid?   1 Date of the infringement 28/5/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 4/6/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 10/6/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Parking&Property Management LTD   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] 34-39 Magnolia House & 1-83 Cedar House Spelthorne Grove, Sunbury - on - Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7.   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. It doesnt seem to. It states they operate in accordance with the International Parking Community's Code of Practice (IPC). On the back it says "Contesting this parking Charge" and under this heading it states that "all letters contesting a parking charge are carefully considered and replied to within 28 days. Charges are put on hold until an appeals decision has been reached. If we reject the appeal, you will be provided with the contact details of the Independent Appeals Service."   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here Nothing else received PARKING NOTICE.pdf
    • Probably about 7 days or so. Do you have her email address?  
    • I should imagin im going for the buyer now she has accepted that its arrived. Ive replied to her txt asking for payment and provided my Paypal email so im just waiting . How long should i give her ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Anyone got any ideas what the fees are, in simple terms

 

Anyone got a template for a letter to inform them that nothing belongs to debtor and they can not come in...

 

also his wife is registered as disabled does this make her a vunerbal person

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone got any ideas what the fees are, in simple terms

 

Similar to council tax I thought - though I am guessing

 

Anyone got a template for a letter to inform them that nothing belongs to debtor and they can not come in...

 

tomtubby did one ages ago, something about not having the goods to be able to satisfy the debt - it was very good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Guest Thebailiff

Fee's. only court fee's and basic company fee's added at first (about £500 in total).

 

after that, no further fee's untill AHCEO levies on something and then he can charge upto £300+vat for any visits he makes if its a residential case. £400 if its commercial.

 

Just a basic letter even hand written would do but you would need signed documents from the owner of the goods so if ownership is questioned in court, there may be a problem if that person is not really the owner. If the other person really is the owner then reciepts and or written confirmation will be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff

tomtubby did one ages ago, something about not having the goods to be able to satisfy the debt - it was very good.

 

 

It does not matter with HCE group as they can sieze a lawnmower for a £1,000,000 debt if they wish too. We dont work under the same rules as council tax bailiffs and so on.

 

I have siezed and removed just 2 cars worth about £3000 for a £1.25million debt as thats all they had. then they were made bankrupt by claimant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bailiff

 

You may be interested to know that we are hearing more and more complaints from CREDITORS using the services of High Court Enforcement companies who are very unhappy because they were not aware of the high level of fees being charged to the debtor by the HCEO and that they will ONLY be paid AFTER your fees have first been dealt with.

 

Many creditors have told me that they wished that they had instead used the services of the County Court Bailiff !!

 

The statutory regulations covering your firms fees are of course set by Parliament and the crucial term used is that "reasonable" fees can be made. There is NO WAY POSSIBLE that a visit fee of £400 to £500 can ever be seen as "reasonable" and I am sure that most, if not all. people reading this will agree.

 

I would like to say that I welcome your input in these posts as this subject is very difficult to understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff
Bit pointless wasn't it, I mean once they are BR the claimant isn't likely to get any money back.

 

not as pointless as you might think. we were siezing and removing everything of his we could find. in the end it was 2 cars a couple or garge tools and some other small pieces.

 

After he was made bankrupt they found no less than 4 homes in his name aswell as 7 cars agarged at one of those properties, all registered in his name.

 

He was a drug dealer and all that crap and thought he was clever. Also, the claim was not made by a public company but with powers to recover goods bought from the proceeds of crime, or goods to the value of, proceeds from crime belonging to the debtor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After he was made bankrupt they found no less than 4 homes in his name

 

Why wasn't a land registry search made much earlier in the piece?

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff
Why wasn't a land registry search made much earlier in the piece?

 

Things in life are never as simple as you think and when someone has multiple its difficult to chase all his belongings. it took about six months to find everything in the end. While i was searching for him he was using 6 different names, either just slight spelling differences or completely different names.

 

You see, you think we have it easy. it took months searching for this guy and in that time we earnt nothing. not a single penny. bailiffs dont just go after the easy subject. We chase criminals half the time to recover money which belongs to YOU (by way of goverment that is).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...