Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I know now, but always thought that if the transaction was excepted by card only way a customer could get a refund is by taking the goods back to get their money back 
    • Hello  Please help, as today I received a letter re. debt recovery.  Is there anything I can do at this stage? The driver fell foul of the confusing car parking situation re. Starbucks and McDonald's. 1 Date of the infringement 13/02/24 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 5/3/24 3 Date received 7/3/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? CCTV photos 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here  Final reminder on 9/4/24 & Debt Recovery letter dated 30/4/24 In either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY Parking charge (1).pdf
    • Yes I can imagine that kind of thing rankles a lot. I don't know what the timescale is for making chargeback claims. I suggest that you find out and then change your way working so that you keep records at least until then. It may be six months
    • no need to use @username just type. please fill out the sticky  as it asks  dx    
    • It was more the principle of this matter the customer has made no attempt to return the products purchased nor have I had no prof of anything & i have had to try & prove the sale which was paid for by the customers phone at the till. Only keep them till I check if the settlements tally up with the bank. Just think its a way of being scammed & the banks are helping them in a way 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

sneakiest trick yet by a DCA?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter this morning hand written on a plain piece of A5 paper.

 

This is what it says in it's entirety:

 

17-7-06

 

78 York Street

London

W1H 1DP

 

Dear (my name)

 

I understand you hold the franchise for HELPSELLUK.CO.UK for the postcode FY1 should you be wishing to sell, Im a willing buyer at £1000 plus I will pay all legal and transfer fees and expenses.

 

T R Payne

 

This is hand written on plain paper, remember, no letterhead, nothing.

 

Type that web address in and you get this single screen:

 

Important Notice

 

Anyone wishing to convert their conditional certificates into registration certificates should do do as soon as possible. The fee now stands at £500 please make cheque out to: Helps and send to:

 

PO Box 100

Swanley

BR8 9AJ

Thank you

 

No company name, nothing.

 

type the London address on the letter into Google though and you get this:

 

C & S Business Bureau

78 York Street, London.

 

About C&S Business Bureau - Central London Address and Telephone Answering Services

 

This is a company that amongst other things offer a mail forwarding service. The web address means nothing to me. Absolutely no question at all in my mind that this is a tactic by a DCA trying to find out if I'm still at the same address (since I NEVER reply to letters from DCA's)

 

How low down can you get? Nothing new of course, a Manchester company used to send out postcards stating asking you to phone back because they had a parcel waiting to be delivered to you and needed you to confirm your address.

 

If you're reading this, T R Payne, or whoever you are, nice try but even if you see this and it confirms to you that I got your letter, it's not going to get you anywhere so don't waste your time and more importantly, don't waste mine. Meatime I will forward this to the relevant authorities and see if they can trace YOU.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

if it is a limited liability company or a PLC they they cant do anything, if you have a YOURNAME t/a COMPANYNAME then they can take their dibbs. they CANNOT take the company name from you at all!

 

If they attempt to take the company name, charge the the following:

 

Company Logo Design Cost: £1200

Company Website design Costs: £4000

Company Advertising (even if ti was free, you still used company time to do this): £60 / hour of this time

Company Clients: Sellt them at £200 per client, as clients are seen as company asssets.

 

Send them this quotation and see how they react :-)

 

Never forget, if they ever contact you in any respect of your company, they contact you on business terms!

 

Also, if they continue to contact you about your company, write to them, tell them that you hire yourself out at £10 legal administration charges (max stat charge), then tally up the hours they cost you. Dont forget that every hour you spend on them in company time, is an hour of profit lost in your company...

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it is a limited liability company or a PLC they they cant do anything, if you have a YOURNAME t/a COMPANYNAME then they can take their dibbs. they CANNOT take the company name from you at all!

 

If they attempt to take the company name, charge the the following:

 

Company Logo Design Cost: £1200

Company Website design Costs: £4000

Company Advertising (even if ti was free, you still used company time to do this): £60 / hour of this time

Company Clients: Sellt them at £200 per client, as clients are seen as company asssets.

 

Send them this quotation and see how they react :-)

 

Never forget, if they ever contact you in any respect of your company, they contact you on business terms!

 

Also, if they continue to contact you about your company, write to them, tell them that you hire yourself out at £10 legal administration charges (max stat charge), then tally up the hours they cost you. Dont forget that every hour you spend on them in company time, is an hour of profit lost in your company...

 

 

You're missing the point completely. What I'm getting at is this is nothing to do with websites or companies, it's almost certainly a DCA (Debt Collection Agency) using a spoof offer to provoke a reaction.

 

The WORST thing I could possibly do is answer at all, thus proving to them that I am still at this address. That's precisely what they want me to do.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a postcard once saying to phone the number to claim a worthwhile top prize

 

 

It seemed very unlikley that I had won anything as I had never entered a competition.

 

Just the sort of sneaky tricks they try.

 

 

Well spotted Seylectric

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a few of these postcards. I then had a handwritten note asking me to contact simon on 0000 00000. A couple of days later a neighbour came down and said he had posted the note as this person had called him to see if I lived there.

 

So they can be even sneakier, having spoken to more neighbours it seems a few of them have had calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a postcard once saying to phone the number to claim a worthwhile top prize

 

 

It seemed very unlikley that I had won anything as I had never entered a competition.

 

Just the sort of sneaky tricks they try.

 

 

Well spotted Seylectric

 

I'm a postie and see quite a few of these, however they aren't usually from DCA's - in the small print it tells you the other 'prizes' - commemorative stamps, toaster, kettle - Things that be be bought for a few pounds wholesale. Then when you ring up to claim the prize it's a premium number and the call costs £15+. They send these out in the thousands, so they don't need that many people to reply to make a nice profit.

 

They also send cards that look very like the cards us posties leave when you have a parcel waiting - so you ring up thinking you have a parcel, an automated service then strings you along and bye bye £15-£20 for the call and you get a parcel worth next to nothing.

Bank of Scotland: Claiming £699.47, SETTLED IN FULL at moneyclaim stage

Sisters NatWest - Claiming £1056 - SETTLED at AQ stage

Natwest CC - Claiming £804, SETTLED IN FULL at LBA stage

GF Natwest - claiming £749.33, moneyclaim filed - SETTLED IN FULL 04/08

MBNA: Claiming £150 - SETTLED IN FULL at LBA stage

HSBC: £1014 - SETTLED at LBA stage + pending charges removed

Sisters HSBC - £300 - SETTLED IN FULL at prelim stage

Yorkshire bank - claiming £496.68 - SETTLED IN FULL at court date stage.

Capital One - claiming £605.54 -SETTLED IN FULL

 

 

 

DON'T FORGET TO DONATE!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't care less to be honest. I have no intention of contacting whoever the sender was, as stated that was their intention from the start; I won't be obliging them.

 

Don't miss the point here peeps, these tricks are intended to provoke a response. Don't respond and they have failed.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...