Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I don't think they even deserve a reply...    We do have a solid case don't we?? Even though mum corgot the pop that time??
    • To start, my address both on my logbook and with the DVLA are correct.  The first I knew of the bus lane fine was when a woman on another floor in my building posted a photo of a letter addressed to me but with her address on it, on the building's facebook group. I obviously recognised my name so contacted her. She said she'd been receiving these letters for me for months but only asked in the group if anyone knew me when the bailiffs were at her door.  I contacted the debt collection agency and Manchester Council and was told to appeal. So I did and explained what happened said I was more than willing to pay the original fine but its now at over £400 and I would have paid straight away if the letters had gone to the correct address. Months have passed and I have just been told (with no reason) that my appeal was unsuccessful and I need to pay the full amount.  Any help would be appreciated! It just seems so unfair!
    • Exactly right Bank!  I had an email this morning from HM Courts and Tribunals Service Civil Money Claims: Dear Mr xxxx Claim number: 527MCxxx Parcel2Go.com has been given an extra 14 days to respond to your claim. They need to respond to your claim before 4pm on 4 June 2024.  Anyone would think you've been through this before!
    • OK, understood. The second decision to make, given PE are wobbling, would be whether to reply to them (well after 8 May to show you're not scared of them), ridicule their offer which is no offer at all, and ask them to make a serious attempt to settle.  You never know, they might offer a few quid as an out-of.court settlement and it might save your mum having to do court. Just an idea.  Something to consider.
    • If we are sure we have a valid case, she's ready to go to court. Her sister is going with to help with her hearing difficulties,  so we might as well see it through!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex partner wants interest


dawny41
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, please can someone give me some advice,

I was in a relationship and my partner loaned me £3,800 for new windows, the agreement was that i pay him £150 a month until the loan was paid, he took £2,800 off his credit card and £1,000 from his bank to lend me the money, We have since split up and he is now asking me to sign a loan agreement for £4,800 with an APR of 32.9%. He added £1,000 to the loan as he had bought me a TV as a gift but he now wants the money for it. I have just recieved a letter from his solicitor asking me to sign this agreement and have been given 7 days to reply. What should i do?

If I had known that the interest on the card was so high i wouldn't have borrowed it from him, he didn't ever mention interest only pay back £3,800 on the 25th of the month at a rate of £150.00. The TV he bought was a gift. I Have been paying the stated amount every month without fail.

Any advice would be a help to me.

Dawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in a relationship and my partner loaned me £3,800 for new windows, the agreement was that i pay him £150 a month until the loan was paid

Was there anything in writing to this effect? Have you been paying him?
He added £1,000 to the loan as he had bought me a TV as a gift but he now wants the money for it.
Realistically he can forget getting the money back even if he takes you to court as it was a gift.
We have since split up and he is now asking me to sign a loan agreement for £4,800 with an APR of 32.9%
Whatever you do don't sign this. Even if he took you to court and won (bear in mind he would have to prove that the debt exists) he would not set the interest rate - the court would. I strongly suspect that this would be set at the statutory rate of 8%.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for your reply.

No, there wasn't anything in writing, it was all verbal between us, I have been paying him £150. every month since July. I was paying the money onto a payment slip that he was giving me every month because he didn't want the money going into his bank account, He said it would look like a wage?? I have now set up a D/D I think that it is to another account or straight to the Card company, but, it does have his name on it. What shall i do about the solicitors letter?? I have 7 days to reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does the solicitors letter actually state?

I have now set up a D/D
I would change that to a standing order as the amount of a DD can be changed by either party.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i'll change to SO.

He told his solicitor that i was aware of the 32.9% and that i had originally said that i would pay it back in full!!!

The solicitor has asked if i can borrow the £2,800 to pay the credit card off and continue to pay the £150. per month until the balance is paid at the standard rate of 8%. I am not in a position to do this, my ex knows that. He has stated that he will put a charge on my property and end up owning it?? I dont know wat to say to the solicitor in response!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

He told his solicitor that i was aware of the 32.9% and that i had originally said that i would pay it back in full!!!

 

He would have to prove that in court. This would be more than a little difficult for him to do as he has no written agreement to confirm this.
He has stated that he will put a charge on my property and end up owning it??
What complete rubbish. He would first of all need to prove that the debt exists and the amount of the debt - he is not really in a position to do either. If he could do this then a CCJ would be issued against you and a time order giving you time to pay in installments based on your ability to pay (this would be set by the court). Only if you defaulted on this would he be able to go for a charge on your property. He would not own your property nor would he be able to force the sale of the property.

 

Could you please tell me what the letter actually states.

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,The Solicitors letter.We have recieved instructions from our client who informs us that he loaned you £4,700 in June this year. We understand that when he loaned you this sum you had intended ti re-mortgage your property and repay him promtly. We further understand that you were unable to repay him from the money raised from your re-morgage because of circumstances beyond your control.Our client informs us you are aware that £2,800 of the money he lent you was borrowed on a credit card and he is paying interest at 32.9% in view of the fact that the only purpose for him to borrow this money was to lend to to you, we are sure that you will accept that he should not need to pay this interest from his own pocket, but that you should be responsible for it. We understand that you are currently paying at a rate of £150 per month, which means that it will take considerable time to to clear the credit card debt and that the interest will be significant. We have seen a copy of the loan agreement which our client forwarded to you which appears to be reasonable, under the circumstances. We understand, however, that you are not agreeing to pay any interest on the sum he lent you. In order to avoid paying the high level of interest, the only option is to raise the sum owed to our lient and re-pay it in full.This would enable our client to clear his credit card.We wonder whether you would be able to raise the £2,800 in which case our client would be prepared to accept payment of the balance at a rate of £150 with the interest at the statutary rate of 8%. To add certainty to the verbal agreement between you it would help if we could agree onthe terms of a written agreement s that you both know where you stand with regards to future payments. We would be grateful if you could respond in 7 days with your proposals for settlement of the debt, inclusive of interest.we look forward to hearing from you.My ex originally told me he had A1 credit, the card was a new American express with a balance of £10,000, i know that he was nearly up to the max on the card, he told me he had paid it off, surely he would have had 0% interest on it for a while or transfered it to another with no interest?? he told me so many lies i don't no what is the truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add certainty to the verbal agreement between you it would help if we could agree onthe terms of a written agreement s that you both know where you stand with regards to future payments.

It would certainly help him. It doesn't help you at all.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that without a written agreement, the claimant will struggle to prove his case. The wording of the solicitor's letter suggests that they are aware of this.

 

I note that the solicitors are also in breach of the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection:

 

We wonder whether you would be able to raise the £2,800

 

In the circumstances, I'd be inclined to reply along these lines:

 

Dear Reptiles

 

I refer to your letter dated (date), the contents of which are noted.

 

The facts are that no formal agreement was entered into, and that there was no agreement to pay interest. The television that X bought, the cost of which he is now attemting to claim from me, was a gift. You have failed to produce any evidence to the contrary, presumably because none exists. I am, therefore, content to continue with the existing arrangement until such time as the amount of (original sum) is repaid.

 

Your client's contractual obligations to his creditors are entirely a matter for him.

 

Yours etc.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...