Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

sacked on monday should i put it on my cv


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5704 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks i was sacked on monday 14th but are taking my previous employer to a court for constructive dismissal but in the mean time i will need to find a new job dont know what to do.

Should i write sacked for gross misconduct or not or leave it blank and can they give me a bad reference as before this my work history was spotless and finding a job is hard enough with out this on my cv.

But as im innocent i feel i have to tell them the truth

 

Please help regards al

Edited by ADW2002UK
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

How long did you work for them?

 

Many potential employers don't like the fact workers stand up for themselves and know their rights and take an ET action.

 

Harsh but a reality. Especially in menial type jobs.

 

Give us some more info to help you get around this problem.

 

btw Monday was the 13th! Hope you have this correct in your legal calculations for time limits!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why on earth would you want to put anything at all on your CV, until the 'court' (I presume you mean ET?) has reached a decision?

 

By your own admission you are bringing a claim for constructive dismissal, the very essence of which must surely be, that it was the actions of your employer that left you with no option but to resign in the face of their fundamental breach of contract.

 

Should you win your claim, then your were not, '...sacked for gross misconduct...', but quite legally resigned in reaction to their breach.

 

Thus you would not be misleading anyone by not putting this fact (your employer's allegation) on your CV

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think thats somewhat black and white elche.

 

At the current time, the OP HAS been sacked for gross misconduct. Until such a time that ET overturn this decision, this is the case.

 

In addition, its going to look mighty strange on his CV to put down his prior employer, and not put them as a reference. Also, what does he say when he is asked the inevitable question at interview "Why did you leave your last job"? Any answer other than that he was dismissed for GM is a lie....

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take your point MR Shed but I feel that at most you should tell a new employer, if you must tell them anything at all, is that the reason for leaving the old job, is subject to litigation and at this stage it would be premature and inappropriate to comment further.

 

And in addition no-one independent has as yet (I presume) examined the decision of the employer. Hence, whilst the employee may have been dismissed for GM it doesn't mean this dismissal had any legal basis. Surely in contentious dismissals the employee can rightly put forward his version, until such time as a Tribunal reaches an opinion.

 

Surely this is better than just saying, ' I was dismissed for GM'?

 

But in fairness the OP doesn't have much in the way of detail around what happened, so i wouldn't wish to speculate further.

Edited by elche

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree - its not a straightforward situation.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

As a recruiter I can agree with all that this is a tough, yet suprisingly common problem.

 

I interview 3-4 people a day, and the advise I would give (just my opinion) is don't mention this on your CV, but be as open and honest as possible....in fact seek to bring it up at interview.

 

As a CV, you are only a piece of paper on an employers desk, which they will skim read at best. However, face to face, you are a real person, with a character and an opportunity to demonstrate your capability.

 

When screening CV's I would probably bin any with dismissal on them but would and have employ people who were open and honest in the interview, even if they were at fault. I find many employers share my views.

 

For me, if someone has tried to hide the fact they were dismissed and were dis-honest, that would be game over for me.

 

Tough one, but I hope this helps.

I'm not a legal expert. Anything I offer is my opinion based on my personal experience, so please get professional, legal advise before taking any action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When screening CV's I would probably bin any with dismissal on them but would and have employ people who were open and honest in the interview, even if they were at fault. I find many employers share my views.

 

Since no one else has brought it up, can I just say I don't understand this. Why bin the CVs if you want to reward honesty?

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...