Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can I delay the repo to sell it myself


chris600uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, here's an update;

 

I've been very busy moving items of property out of the reach of any bailiff, and just in case I end up bankrupt - so I didn't have a chance to respond to the letter we had from our lender.

 

We had a phone call from them - and they were sooooo nice! Amazing!

 

They were ringing to see if we would pay this months instalment, and seemed surprised that we hadn't cos we'd been so good paying them every month since the susp repo order was made.

 

We explained that we'd expected to have the house sold by now and we'd simply run out of money.

 

So they suggested we ask the CAB help us get the DSS to pay a third of our mortgage, and that by the sound of the paperwork we'd been sent they would probably agree to a shortfall at auction.

 

It seems they have a number of people who are getting a third of their mortgage from the DSS.

 

What do you make of that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just saw this on the Shelter England website:

 

 

 

If the judge made a suspended possession order, you can stay in your home as long as you keep to certain conditions. The conditions should be explained in the order, but if it isn't clear, get advice. In many cases, it will say that you have to pay a certain amount off your mortgage arrears each month and keep up with your ongoing mortgage payments. When you have paid off the arrears, you simply need to continue to pay your normal monthly payments when they are due.

 

If you don't keep to the conditions of a suspended possession order, you can be evicted very easily. For example, if you miss even one payment, your lender can apply for a bailiff's appointment straight away. There isn't normally another hearing and you may only get a few days' warning before the bailiffs arrive.

 

 

Is this correct?

 

With all that's been said here, this statement doesn't seem right at all -

Or is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just saw this on the Shelter England website:

 

 

 

If the judge made a suspended possession order, you can stay in your home as long as you keep to certain conditions. The conditions should be explained in the order, but if it isn't clear, get advice. In many cases, it will say that you have to pay a certain amount off your mortgage arrears each month and keep up with your ongoing mortgage payments. When you have paid off the arrears, you simply need to continue to pay your normal monthly payments when they are due, but you should apply to the court to have the suspended possession order cancelled!

 

If you don't keep to the conditions of a suspended possession order, you can be evicted very easily. For example, if you miss even one payment, your lender can apply for a bailiff's appointment straight away. They can apply for a warrant of eviction. There isn't normally another hearing You can apply to the court for a hearing to suspend eviction and you may only get a few days' warning before the bailiffs arrive Usually 2 - 3 weeks notice, but I've heard of it only being 7 days, however you can usually get a hearing before the eviction date and in exceptional circumstances on the morning the eviction is due.

 

Ell

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris, you can only have the suspension cancelled when you have paid all the arrears under the original order.

 

If the lender applies for a warrant for eviction then you can apply to the court to have the eviction suspended to give you time to sell the property yourself - we can help you with the application if that is what you decide to do.

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE:

 

 

We've just had a letter saying that they've reviewed the account and want squillions to clear the outstanding repayments.

 

The important bit as far as I can see is where it says that this payment is a condition of your suspended repo order and if we don't pay up they may ask the court without a further hearing for permission to take possession of the house.

 

We were burgled the other night, so frankly the end of this miserable saga can't come soon enough.

 

We are now waiting for the possession/eviction notice, because we understand we can't really do anything legally until then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ell-enn is your expert in this field

 

And I am not sure if she would agree with me - but if there is anyway you can try and keep control of the sale of the property please try and do that.

 

The lender is also in the difficult position of trying to market the property fairly and obtain a reasonable price - whilst trying not to let the debt increase.

 

But if they do sell for less that you think it should sell it for you will have a fight on your hands proving that is the case as I think there are only guidelines on how they should proceed after possession. Not regulations.

 

 

As you say depending on the debt after the sale you may still have to consider your options as regards to bankruptcy. Please make sure you keep meticulous records in writing of everything that happens at this stage as there are new guidleines about how the lender must treat you so you need to keep your records in good order in case you have any dispute in the future.

 

Sorry for your situation and hope that you get a lot of support here which may help you through this difficult time.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been watching this coming for what feels like a very long time now.

 

I'm still positive though.

 

Our task now is to keep possession until after Christmas and the New Year, and get the house listed at a local property auction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Had a strange letter from the lender - it makes no sense

 

We've already had the house revalued and revalued by various estate agents, and at the lenders request by a chartered surveyor, and by an auctioneer.

 

The lender refuses to agree to an auction, even though the auctioneer values the house at £50k more than the Chartered surveyor and prices are generally falling.

 

This is very odd, why would they do this? I'd have thought they'd want to recover as much money as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you actually post up what else the letter says? Are they proposing letting you sell on the open market?

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Mr and Mrs,

 

Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding the sale of your property and the potential shortfall.

 

Your request has been reviewed by our underwriters and they have made the decision not to allow the property to be placed in an auction for sale.

 

However, we may consider a sale shortfall once the property is marketed at a realistic asking price and the relevant sale documents are received.

 

Please note, whilst your sale shortfall request is being considered, any legal action which is taking place or due to commence, will continue.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

The lender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is this, they have already had the sale documents, the property has been on the market for two years, they insisted on a valuation by a Chartered Surveyor who valued it at £75k less than the mortgage (not including arrears), whereas the auctioneer suggested a guide price of £50k less than the mortgage.

 

House prices are only going to go one way during the next 12 months - down - and that could be by as much as another 25 - 30%.

 

You can see why we thought the auction was a good idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We said we were going to auction ours and they said they would not agree we did and got more than er had to pay them just the court agreed with us you need to put a reserve on the auction if they go for repossession you can ask the court to let you sell under the law and proerty act this can be done even if you have negative equity there is case law so you need to write and tell them if they dont agree you will go to court asking for this order for you to sell and quote the case law

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Is this it?

 

Palk v Mortgage Services Funding plc [1993] Ch 330, CA, it would appear that a court may, in some limited circumstances, suspend a possession order if the mortgagor is seeking an order for sale of the property under section 91 of the Law of Property Act 1925. Palk's case established that the court has power under section 91(2) to allow a sale by the mortgagor even though the proceeds of sale may be insufficient to discharge the mortgage debt.

Edited by chris600uk
tidiness
Link to post
Share on other sites

Law of Property Act 1925 (c.20)

 

1 Sale of mortgaged property in action for redemption or foreclosure

 

(1) Any person entitled to redeem mortgaged property may have a judgment or order for sale instead of for redemption in an action brought by him either for redemption alone, or for sale alone, or for sale or redemption in the alternative.

 

(2) In any action, whether for foreclosure, or for redemption, or for sale, or for the raising and payment in any manner of mortgage money, the court, on the request of the mortgagee, or of any person interested either in the mortgage money or in the right of redemption, and, notwithstanding that—

 

(a) any other person dissents; or

 

(b) the mortgagee or any person so interested does not appear in the action;

 

and without allowing any time for redemption or for payment of any mortgage money, may direct a sale of the mortgaged property, on such terms as it thinks fit, including the deposit in court of a reasonable sum fixed by the court to meet the expenses of sale and to secure performance of the terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres also other case law where the value of the property was also under the mortgaged amount also if you want I will forward you my case number where we were granted an order to aloow us to sell under law and property act although the MC didnt agree When are you i court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know yet, I've only just found the legal ruling, but soon I hope because the arrears are just building up, and the house value is still sliding.

 

I had a feeling LM didn't want to do anything, and it occurred to me that they could be waiting for an upturn in the market, at our expense.

Now I'm certain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...