Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Oakwood Repossession Hearing


ascint57
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5701 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The lender will most prob be granted a suspended possession for say 1 year ( this you would need to argue your case here and get the suspension time as little as possible) They will have to have a possession order because of the level of arrears ie it's over 2 months). However you can ask the judge for the arreas to be paid back over say 2 years, but you would then have to make the regular payments on the loan each month from now on .. The fact the it is on the market wont really help.... it would only be a factor to the judge if you had a buyer that had exchanged contracts prior to the hearing . that would it help. Providing you keep to the terms of the suspension for the length of the suspension you wont loos the property .... and of course you can continue to try & sell it in the meantime

 

is the any equity in it?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

is the any equity in it?

 

 

Yes it was originally our retirement home, but its decreasing daily, having gone down due to the recession and the mess the previous tenants made from 165k to 115k with about 60 k of equity at 115k

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, there's still time for them to send you something - if you haven't received anything by the day before the hearing we will amend your statement to reflect the fact that you have no information as to the true state of your account.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

 

 

Ell-enn as predicted we received a letter in reply, this morning from Oakwoods solicitors.

The correspondence dated 9th October refers to the hearing and suggests quote " It is not too late to avoid your home being repossessed even if you are not in a position to pay the arrears in full"

 

It asks to complete the enclosed Income and Expenditure forms and our proposal of repayment plus the date of repayment, and how it will be paid, but it has to be returned 2 days before the hearing, which doesn't give me much time.

 

As you know I've been told by Oakwood they want the mortgage plus 80 ukp .

 

They have included a statement of the arrears the original GMAC mortgage, the transfer forms AND a letter dated 19th September to the 'Occupiers' of the cottage outlining their intention to start possession proceedings. My tenant has not seen the letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

They want your defence before the hearing so they can instruct their representatives, it's up to you whether you send them what they want or wait to submit it to the judge.

 

I have quite a few meetings at work today, so won't be able to get back to you until this evening.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, you could always argue that you didn't get their letter in time to return the info two days before the hearing i.e. you would have to get it to them tomorrow as the hearing is Tuesday 21st

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 3 Appendices to affix to the statement:

 

Appendix 1 - new tenancy agreement

Appendix 2 - estate agent contract to sell property

Appendix 3 - correspondence with Oakwood

 

On each of the Appendices you need to write the Claim Number on the top left hand corner and the Appendix Number on the top right hand corner.

 

You will need 3 copies of everything to take on the day - 1 set for yourselves, one for the judge and one for the other side.

 

Any further questions, just shout.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

 

Do I also need copies of the letters from Oakwood or their solicitors that I replied to ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have confirmed our offer, already sent it and by recorded delivery some 3 weeks ago, well before the N24 was received When I asked Oakwood why they needed to get a judgement they said it was to ensure the agreement was met. We also sent them a copy of the for sale agreement from the estate agents and a copy of the new tenancy agreement.

 

this is what you need to send as Appendix 3 and also any reply they sent to you regarding your offer.

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't need to put in our replies to their other requests for information, or the two replies to their solicitors requests. It includes confirmations of conversations had that outlining what our ongoing problems were.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you should include anything which you think proves you have kept them advised of your situation and anything which shows your offer of payment towards the arrears.

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem, any questions just shout:)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delivered the staement and evidence to the court this morning.

Then while I was waiting for them to open at 10.15 I noticed that part of their witness statement said our monthly payment is 27.13 qabove what it should be. Its a fixed interest mortgage until Jan 11th so the payments should always be the same.

I rand Oakwood this morning who admit they have received 2 payments so the witness statement is wrong there as they state we have not made any, and they don't know why the statement says the payment has increased as its a fixed interest mortgage until January.

The lady then said, just mention it to the judge and he will account for it in the arrangement. When I said but surely he might give you possession, she said no, we aren't looking for possession just an arrangement backed by the judges decision ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that was strange. Met the judge and the opposition lawyer, who seemed keen to help us rather than get a result, the judge agreed a 50 ukp payment on top of the mortgage, which was better than we'd hoped for. Problems were Judge agreed with me that their witness statement was incorrect and the payment due was some 27 less than they ahd advised. He also disagreed with the arrears figure, agreeing with me he couldn't work out how it came about and that it needed clarifying. Opposing solicitor had no idea, but the Judge didn't ask for written clarification but did comment in his notes.

So no doubt i'll see in the written statement, will I not

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good result! well done, hope you can relax a bit now. You should receive a copy of the judge's order in the post very soon (by the end of the week I should think). Glad it went OK for you :)

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're very welcome :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...