Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks BankFodder, attached are the bundle pages. Looks like my pages exceed the max file size, is it OK to send in sections? rgds, J
    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mrlin Financi, no CCA no proof of sale, what can i do?


sasperello
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5701 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently asked Marlin Financial for a CCA for a 9 year old debt they are chasing. As the debt was for a car i also asked for a proff of sale price as i surrendered the car to pay off the debt when i got into trouble witthe payments. They eventually sent me a copy of the CCA but over the legal time limit specified. I informed them about this but they have since written back to me saying that the 12 day CCA rule does not apply to this debt as the CCA was cancelled in July 2001! They have also not sent me a copy of the proof of sale so the final

Where do i stand now? Does this mean the debt is no longer valid or am i stuck with paying for it since they have presumably brought it from the origoanl people.?

I'm really stuck as to what to do as they are constantly phoning me on a daily basis and even texting me to contact them to arrange payments.

Can anyone give me an idea what to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have not made a payment or acknowledged this debt for over 6 years (9 you say) then it is statute barred, end of!

 

That does not write the debt off, but it does mean that it is an unenforcable debt so they should cease all debt collection activities.

 

Send them letter M from the letters library and that should do the trick.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have made a few payments at a time when i wa splitting from my partner and was in debt alot. They caught me on the hop i suppose and didn't know what i was doing. However, since then i have got my act together and am now contesting the amount and the debt itself.

 

Have i made a complete pigs ear and now have to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this, edited to suit. Print your name at the bottom, don't use your normal signature.

Dear Sir

 

Acc/Ref No

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years before the current payments started up again. Restarting payments after the six years is up does not override the Statute Barring of this debt. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

PRINT DON'T SIGN

Link to post
Share on other sites

It still gets me this one. Why would they send me out a copy of the CCA and then say that it was cancelled back in 2001? Are they just humouring me or really trying it on?

 

Plus, they have still failed to provide proof of sale for the car that i surrendered (it was GMAC online car finance) and so the amount owed is questionable anyway.

 

As the CCA was cancelled does this also mean they have no means of taking me to court over the matter?

 

Finally, their continued harassment by phone and text is drivig me crazy. I've sent the usual letter asking them to stop but they keep on doing it. Is there anything else i can do?

 

I will now send them another "statute barred" letter as advised.

 

Many, many thanks for all yor help on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send out the stat barred letter by recorded delivery......if they continue to phone / text you, then you need to write down all the times and dates they call....as you could potentially take them to court for harrassment...this is what the OFT say

 

Psychological Pressure / Harrassment

 

2.14 (b) -

continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they

will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to

harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of

Justice Act 1970.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once you have sent them the harrassment letter, write down all the times and dates they call....if they persist then...

 

Cancer patient sues the Halifax for harassment after 762 calls about loan - Times Online

 

Halifax harassment case settled out of court | Money | guardian.co.uk

 

you could take them to court as the 2 above did....

 

Certainly complain to OFCOM, Trading Standards, and the OFT and your local MP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest update.

 

They have completely ignored all my letters and are threatening to pass on my details to a company called Scotcall for door to door collection. Who are these people and should i be worried?

 

They are still phoning me about it though. What should i do as i am really worried that someone will turn up on my doorstep demanding loads of money from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do send it to Scotcall then send them this ...by recorded delivery

 

Dear xxxx

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing. I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone over the past few weeks/months and these have been duly logged by time and date.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely

 

And keep writing down the times and dates they are calling you....TAKE THEM TO COURT if you can....certainly tell Trading Standards, the OFT and the FOS...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scotcall do door to door collections but they aren't very good at it. I've had several notices that they are coming but they have never arrived. Perhaps they got lost.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...