Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Royal bank of scotalnd. scotcall HELP!


666flo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5702 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hope I'm posting this in the right place, if not sorry!.

 

Please can someone advise what to do as im totally confused! :-

 

About two years ago I recieved a letter from the royal bank of scotland saying that my account was in arrears and that i had to pay it back. Which was news to me as as far as i was aware i didnt have a bank account them them in the first place. so I called up and discovered that it was an very old account from when i was a child! which should have been closed a loong time ago and it hadn't been used in many many years. Anyway some how they had "upgraded" the account and had started charging me for it, hence why i was due money.. think it was about 200 or something they said I was due! Anyway the women on the phone agreed that this was clearly a mistake and that the the debit would be cleared and the account closed. Fair enough i thought & haven't heard a thing since, until last month. I have recieved a letter from a company called scotcall saying I'm due a company called capquest RBOS money. I can only assume it is the royal bank of scotland (RBOS).

 

What on earth do I do about it? not having ever been in debt or owed any money I'm not sure who to contact regarding this matter? do I contact the bank or scotcall? do I call or write a letter? has anyone had this before? arghhh it soo annoying!! please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best way to try and find out is to send a Subject Access Request to the Data Controller at RBS Head Office

 

Unfortunately it will cost £10 (send a postal order) and send it by recorded delivery....

 

But at least you know where you stand.....

 

The debt is probably statute barred anyway as you have not made a payment for at least 6 years BUT it could be that there may be some excessive charges due back to you.....

 

This is the SAR (Subject Access Request) they HAVE to respond within 40 days...

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

print but don't sign your name

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worthwhile sending Scotcall this letter too...DO NOT TELEPHONE THEM - THEY WILL LIE TO FRIGHTEN YOU INTO PAYING...

 

 

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR ANY YOU MAY REPRESENT

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things : firstly, write a formal complaint to RBS about them upgrading your account without having contacted you first. You did not know the account had been upgraded (only discovering this a couple of years ago when you rang to query the account) and therefore were unaware of any charges. Because RBS made no effort at all to advise you of the charges you obviously had no opportunity to put the matter right.

 

Secondly, write to Scotcall advising the matter is the subject to a formal complaint to RBS and you cannot deal with Scotcall. Don't speak to them on the phone.

 

A question : did you ever receive statements for the account, and if so when did they stop arriving?

 

You say the account started when you were a child. Presumably you have changed addresses since then so perhaps the bank lost touch with you. It would be interesting to find out how they found you a couple of years back.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was quick in replying, thanks a lot!! You guys are great!

 

I'm not 100% sure on the details as it was such a long time ago. As far I can remember I've never had a statement for this account not until the said i owed them money for it. I have no idea how they got my current address either. its all a bit strange.

 

sorry for being a total thicko here but what do you mean by " The debt is probably statute barred?"

 

I was thinking I would just make an appointment or go into the bank and have it out with them about it. would that be a good idea?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have neither made a payment towards OR admitted the debt in 6 years then it will be barred by statute and UNENFORCEABLE by law....of course if you do nothing about it, and don't make a stand against anybody trying to take it to legal, then they could win by default.....

 

Send the letters I wrote above.....

 

Keep us posted as and when you hear back...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In the end we decided just to go into the Royal bank of Scotland to speak to them first & try and get some form of records/history from the said account. haha. The lady on the front deak was rude, unfriendly and wasn’t interested at all. As far as she was concern she thought i must be speaking crap and that im trying to get out of paying the debt. All she said was you have to phone scotcall and pay the debt!

At first she couldn’t' find the account on her computer then she found it and said it was "closed". I asked her if she could print off some statements for the account, which she said she couldn’t as the account is closed and they don’t have any records. I asked her if she could tell me who closed the account then. to which she said she couldn’t. According to her I should have the paperwork for the account. We tried to explain that I don’t have any paper work as I didn’t even know the account existed until they sent a threatening letter saying we owed money. she couldn't understand that part though. anyway she wouldn’t let us see the manager. Twice she went away to speak to the "area manager" on the 2nd time she came back with a number that we could phone. well done to our local branch of the royal bank of Scotland for being useless!

 

after three attempts at calling the number finally got to speak to someone who was very helpful & friendly. once they had found the account eventually.. she said oh yes this shouldn’t be going on, the account was closed years ago and the debt cleared and apparently capquest (who originally had the made up "debt") should never have sold it on to scotcall. she said they will contact scotcall and sort it out and if we get anymore letters from scotcall we are too phone them ( the credit something or other) again and they will speak to scotcall.

so fingers crossed that is the end of the "pretend debt" from the royal bank of scotland..

 

thanks to all above for the advice!!

Edited by 666flo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...