Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2007 Audi A4 Convertible Major Problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5713 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, in Nov 2007 I bought on a pcp an Audi A4 2.0Fsi Turbo Convertible, after the first couple of weeks I realised that the parking sensor it was supposed to have was not working, no sound at all so took it back and they fixed it, fair enough. Now, nearly only a year later I have major problems with the car, while I was filling up the water in the windscreen washer bottle, I noticed a bolt was loose, nearly off completely down in the engine bay on the connector of a hose, I'm not a mechanic so I dont know what it was, but it shouldnt have been like that!

 

The other problems are these:

 

There is a lot of rust on the subframe of the car.

 

A large peice of metal has fallen off the passenger seat from somewhere and is lodged in the runner of the seat and it cant be moved.

 

There is a loud rubbing sort of noise when the wheels are full lock both ways and going forward and reverse?

 

I should not have these problems with a car that is LESS that a YEAR old.

I have spoken to Audi and they have not done much, I'm waiting to speak to the sales manager. What do you guys think are the options here?, obviously I dont want to drive that car anymore, telling them I'm frightened to drive it incase something else from the car breaks. Its unlikely they're going to be able to find me a replacement, of the same spec, colour, age ect so thats not really an option. A new car? wouldnt that take months to order? if so, what do I get while I'm waiting and why should I have to pay my monthly fee for a car I dont drive anymore?

 

Any help much appreciated

 

Thanks

Ben

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many miles do you do a year?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly sounds like a bit of a "duffer" on that mileage. That said, everything I have heard is a little "niggle" as opposed to a major fault - other than the rust, which is a major concern.

 

At this stage, I would say that due to the age of the car, you do not have the option of forcing either a refund or replacement of the car, but Audi have an obligation to FULLY resolve all of the issues. I fail to see how they can resolved major rust without replacement of the vehicle...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah the other things are small problems, but the rust is major and if they repair it that means replacing the whole subframe of the car, that would negatively affect the residual value of the car, so yeah I would like them to replace the car but as I said, wouldnt it take another 6 months for them to order and have a new car built? thats inconvenience to me thats not acceptable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea how long it would take - I am not a mechanic

 

I disagree that it would affect the residuals - I fail to see how if the work is performed FULLY and PROPERLY. There is no need to declare such work at any point unless asked - it is not like the situation with an insurance write off.:)

 

If they provide you with a courtesy car, that would be acceptable in law.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How is a courtesy car acceptable for 6 months wait due to their incompetance? So I'd be paying nearly £400 a month for a courtesy car? I dont think so. Also, maybe it would not affect the actual residual worth of the car but would put people off as in, when someone comes to buy the car they would ask to see receipts and think well if thats gone wrong within one year what else will go wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be acceptable legally, as you have been put back into the same position in effect within the terms of your contract. If you personally would find it unacceptable, that is fair enough, but unenforceable.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car is owned by the laesing company and it is them that you should be dealing with. ITs their car not yours, they are providing a service.

Any problems with the car of this magnitude should be through them. It is them that supplied the car for you or paid for it and its them that have the contract with the dealer, IIRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...