Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Checking hi-tech with low tech - Wales leading the way Growing Mid Wales, an organisation set up to bring together the private and public sectors alongside the Welsh Government, has launched a mobile mapping project to track areas of poor mobile phone signal Powys and Ceredigion. They will be using bin lorries which have signal detection equipment installed, and thus able to create a comprehensive map of mobile 'not-spots' in the area, since those vehicles will be visiting just about every property in the area on their usual rounds. Just a moment... WWW.THINKBROADBAND.COM  
    • Hi there   thank you for the reply. No, it's not a silly question at all. I am convinced I didn't hit anything with my car. I was going very slowly and it was the guy standing next to his lorry in the road who punched and kicked my car as I went by. It's cause I saw him do it in the mirror.  I initially thought he did it because he thought I was passing him maybe too closely whilst he was messing around with his lorry ?  That's why I stopped and got out and asked what he thought he was doing hitting my car. He then just hurled abuse at me. Not making any accusations such 'you hit me' 'you hit my lorry' or you did this or that. He just swore and shouted at me. At which point I said I would be making a complaint to his company for his threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I went to my car , got my phone to take a photo of his number plate but then he came towards me again and I thought if he now hits me I am going to come second. I am a woman in her mid 50s travelling on her own and this guy looked like a Millwall football supporter (short, rotund, skin head) so I decided to leave this situation. I got back in my car closed the door and drove off before he could reach me.  I later checked my phone and noticed the photo was too blurred, as I turned and rushed back to my car too quickly before the camera could focus. So I thought it was pointless making a complaint as the guy couldn't be traced anyway, so I forgot all about it until yesterday. But this is all I can think of, it must have to do with this incident as it is in the same street.   
    • Please read the following thread very carefully. It is extremely relevant where you are suing Evri on the basis of a contract which you originally made with Packlink who are domiciled in Spain. A judgement has been obtained and we have applied for transcript and it will be put up on this thread as soon as we receive it probably about the end of July. In the meanwhile, read this thread, see what has been discovered about the Packlink/Evri/customer relationship and look at the witness statement very carefully. It's a long thread but don't give up. Once you have the transcript of the judgement, then I will do a more careful and explanatory post here   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/459707-evri-lost-my-ebay-parcel-£844-court-claim-issued-judgment/
    • So if the breach occurred say Dec 2017 (first missed payment) and the default notice was issued Sept 2018 and the claim was issued 7th June 24 the claimant will of course be arguing it is within the limitation period (by 3 months)
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Andy v CapOne


andyford2000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5527 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Andy

 

I have received your email and looked over the agreement. From what i can see the agreement looks like it is Enforcable. This looks like a new agreement though, how long ago did you take this out?

 

The charges are stated as being £12...

 

You have definately not asked for PPI as the box has'nt been ticked.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello andyford2000!

 

...the only thing i ever signed was the application form, and i thought they werent enforecable

 

An Application Form is potentially Enforceable, but it would need at least your Signature and the Prescribed Terms.

 

Beware that CapitalOne have a habit of mocking up Application Forms by adding Terms to the back of the Photocopy.

 

It may look Enforceable at first glance, but the question then arises, do they have the Original?

 

Look at what they have sent, and see if there are significant differences between the sides, i.e. does one have black fold marks where you folded it into an Envelope before sending it back to them, whereas the other Page is Virgin White with no black fold lines...that sort of thing.

 

2002 is a while back now, so they would need this to be a Signed Application Form/Agreement and can't say it was done on-line etc.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah i see now Andy, i thought you had Tipexed it out. It has to be signed..

 

The terms and conditions look like the latest ones, as the charges are stated as £12..

 

They should have sent you the terms and conditions from the time you opened the account.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

they only thing i ever signed was the piece of paper that said application form, so i guess its not enforceable, so i could go for both ppi and charges nowplease confirm this is correct

 

Yes correct ;)

 

You seem to be making hard work out of one of the easy banks :p:p

 

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Save your scan as a 'word' doc. (Make's it easy to edit your own details out)

 

Upload to something like 'Potobucket' Image hosting, free photo sharing & video sharing at Photobucket

 

Click on the 'insert imade' button and away you go !!

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers

 

right when i asked for the CCA request last year, this is what i got in return. 3 pieces of paper in total

 

 

7thSeptember20071.jpg

 

 

 

7thSeptember20073.jpg

 

now there is this page too, but it if you look closely you cannot see the fold marks on it like the one above. I have read somewhere that capital one do this quite a lot, trying to make the document look like they were back to back agreements. I would welcome peoples thoughts. when i pressed them to see an enforecable agreement at an earlier date they send me last scanned one before suddenly finding this one. Not realy sure what this means, think they may be trying to pull some kind of fast one., will attach that one too.

 

7thSeptember20072.jpg

 

this

Edited by andyford2000
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello AF2000!

 

Not realy sure what this means, think they may be trying to pull some kind of fast one...

 

That may well be an accurate observation.

 

They want you to think they have a document with your Signature and the Prescribed Terms...hence the appearance of this new 2nd Page (with no Fold Marks that match the 1st Page...crease proof paper perhaps?).

 

How convenient for them.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy if it is of any help I have just completed a case for my mother against cap 1...... I claimed the 15.9 they charged her..... initially they refused. but as the hearing was tomorrow and I stood my ground they paid the remainder into her account on friday....

 

Funnily enough when I aske dfor the cca they ignored it for 3 months and only when i mentiond the fsa did they send... a copy of the application form.....lol

 

they will acknowledge your claim when you submit the court action..... submit the usual basic defence....then go for the additional 14 dyas..... making it 28 in total.....

 

then you will get a court date....... you may also get and AQ request which costs £35 ( it is reclaimable) they will play brinkmanship with you..... STAND FIRM

 

the very worst that can happen is you only get the basic 8% and if you are lucky you willget the 15.9 a difference of a few hundered pounds......

 

Now if they cant produce the original am not sure here but someone smarter than me will know you might even be able to reclaim every payment...

 

hope some of this helps:)

  • Haha 1

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

right, for all those who have been following this thread. I could really do with a final answer on this now, are my POC 100% correct for this

 

I have received this today, and will need to file my action N1 on tuesday at the latest now.

 

comments and observations appreciated please

 

cartersolicitors004copy.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Andy,

 

As one of the Mods stated in an earlier post, your POC looks great, the red bit is fine.

 

On a side note, you could save yourself £85 and let Bryan Carter issue the court papers ;)

 

You then defend the whole of the claim using 'offset', so you don't pay a penny and still win.

This is just a very small point but it will save you a bit of money upfront on court fees.

 

If you make a counter claim you also have to pay a court fee.

 

However, if you say that, as part of your defence, you have the right of equitable set-off of these charges against the amount claimed then you are counter-claiming the charges but you don't need to pay the fee

 

If anybody is interested here is a bot about the different types of set-off:-

 

The 1958 Court of Appeal decision in the case of Hanak -v- Green is regarded as one of the key decisions defining the modern law of set-off. It may now be said there are four forms in which a set-off can arise: 1) Mutual liquidated debts (sometimes called legal set-off). A cross claim can be set-off as a defence if the amount of the debt is known or can be readily and without difficulty ascertained. 2) Equitable set-off (sometimes called transaction set-off). The test as to whether a cross claim can be relied upon as an equitable set-off is whether it is so closely connected with the claim that it would be manifestly unjust to allow the claim without taking into account the cross claim. 3) Contractual set-off. The contract may dictate certain procedures that must be observed to preserve the right to apply a set-off 4) Statutory set-off. For example, under rule 4.90 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 an employer can set-off any claims it can prove against monies owing to an insolvent contractor. (thanks Nicklea)

 

Hope this helps

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats it now,

 

just back from the Court and papers filed, cannot believe how long this has taken me, just hope i havent made any mistakes in POC.

 

watch this space i guess,

 

what does puzzle me is, what if there proceed and file against me today too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...