Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court claim from Lloyds TSB - Advice needed please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 6 months later...
  • Replies 379
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Joan,

I've been following your thread from the beginning, just like to say GOOD LUCK :)

Very helpful thread too.

You are extremely fortunate to have your partner helping you, two heads are always better than one. You know your case which is the main thing. I think you have a really good chance here.

Unfortunately although I have a very dear husband it is I that has to do all the swatting and then try and teach him. He picks things up easily and if I was going to court I would take him for moral support.

I may be wrong but I thought you could ask for permission to take someone to court with you and its usually agreed. You can talk to them but they cannot speak on your behalf. This is how I understood it.

I know you have asked permission for your OH to attend court with you,

Have you had a reply from the court about this?

 

PS. As for trying to work out who Joan is, (this applies to posts later in this thread, please don't take offence, none meant,) IMHO I hope such assumptions will remain private. If Joan ever wishes to reveal her books or identity to us then fine, if not i hope her identity never becomes a guessing game.

Edited by questioning
just added a PS.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well done Joan, Glad you found the courage to go through with it. :cool:

I don't want to overcrowd your thread with good luck wishes all the time, so please remember I'm thinking of you & wishing you success.:smile:

I'm glad to read that your OH was allowed to speak on your behalf, thats a real comfort knowing that.

Kind regards Q.x.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

 

 

 

 

You had the guts and detrmination to stand up to the big boys, total admiration I have and as sorry as I am for you, you should be proud of yourself.

 

Milly XXXX

 

Ditto, I couldn't have written that better myself.

Kind regards To Joan and Joans hubby.

Love Q.x.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not necessarily so, we have a legal charge on our property, I objected and the Judge said that the charge would only apply to my wife's half of the property !!! which is as good as taking my money as well as I see it.

 

But there would need to be a default on the CCJ for a charging order to be granted for the house. Please someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Joan has not defaulted on the CCJ.

All she has to do is apply for redetermination to allow her to pay at a rate that she can afford, The court will only set a payment that she can afford and yes it is true, it is nothing to do with Mr joan at all, even if she had the debt last week, we are not responsible for our spouses debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Q,

I was not implying that they could go straight for a charging order on the house, what I was saying was about the charging order itself, and that the spouse could object.

 

Hi Mightyacorn,

Actually its my apologies that should be going to you,

I'm sorry I read your post completely wrong, I notice no one else did.:oops:

I am very tired today, I've been up all night.

Please accept my apologies.

kind regards Q. x.

 

Lets not talk of charging orders as that's not gonna happen.

The CCj could be paid by installments of an affordable amount set by the court after the redetermination, and as Mr. Joan said, that in its self is a kind of victory!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just make sure you get their payment details ASAP after the redetermination. ive had them be quite obstructive (ignoring letters,etc) in the past to ensure u miss a payment and then its.... CO next stop

 

Very true,

 

You have got to do the redetermination with in 14 days from judgment, Sent by special Del. obviously the sooner the better.

 

To pay the judgment the court will set a monthly date and you should then ask for it to be paid by standing order through your bank.

That way your payments will be made on time.

If they are obstructive then I would tell the court, court manager, in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joan here. I've just rung the court and the clerk and her supervisor are not aware of a redetermination order form per se. They're telling me that the order has not been drawn by the court yet, and that once it's been drawn it will be referred to the district judge to ask for directions. So I am meant to wait for the court to draw up the order, then I can tell them I can't afford to pay more than x amount a month.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by questioning viewpost.gif

You have got to do the redetermination with in 14 days from judgment, Sent by special Del. obviously the sooner the better.

 

 

 

How come this applies if the court clerks from the determination dept are not aware of a redetermination order form per se?

 

I'm very confused. Does anyone know exactly how I should proceed? Do I need a form? Does such a thing as a redetermination form exist? What do I do?

 

As far as what I've been told and my experiences, you can write a letter within 14 days of the judgement and tell them you can't pay, enclose your I & E and make an offer you can afford.

After judgement and if its later than two weeks you have to do it on a form and it costs £35.

If they got ccj by default then I think you have to pay a fee for the redetermination, you can't then write a letter.

 

,, I have just found a form from the court and it is an "Application for a suspension of a warrent and/or variation of an order" "N245," that is what the court sent me a year ago that is the correct name of the form.

i always thought it was called a redetermination form, I only ever looked at it once.

 

Sorry Joan that is what I have been informed from the court and been told by nat. debt line,

I'll flag up your post so others who may definately know can help.

 

I must say it seems that the court were not very helpful.

Edited by questioning
added some info.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Joan here. I've just rung the court and the clerk and her supervisor are not aware of a redetermination order form per se. They're telling me that the order has not been drawn by the court yet, and that once it's been drawn it will be referred to the district judge to ask for directions. So I am meant to wait for the court to draw up the order, then I can tell them I can't afford to pay more than x amount a month.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by questioning viewpost.gif

You have got to do the redetermination with in 14 days from judgment, Sent by special Del. obviously the sooner the better.

 

 

 

How come this applies if the court clerks from the determination dept are not aware of a redetermination order form per se?

 

I'm very confused. Does anyone know exactly how I should proceed? Do I need a form? Does such a thing as a redetermination form exist? What do I do?

 

Flagged this up for Joan if anyone knows exactly how this works.?

 

This is the form that i am talking about called an N245, This is if a court has set an order and you cannot pay and you are applying after 14 days from judgment. Here is the form ..N245...n245_form.pdf......... Have a look here NationalDebt line England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 08 Reducing Payments Or Suspending A Bailiffs Warrant On A County Court Judgment

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. To avoid confusion, do you mean form N245 as pointed out by questioning here?....

 

 

 

...oooh they're talking about bailiffs in that link. I hope it doesn't come to that. If it does I have a pile of jam rags ready and waiting, signed by the author (some in blood, some in ink.)

 

 

Thanks questioning and supasnooper, very useful advice and I will get onto it. I'm sure Mr Joan will be on here at some point during his coffee break to add his tuppence ha'penny wth as well.

 

Just to clarify.........

 

The form I have attached and the link provided are if you have been paying and want to re determine the amount you are paying. It would cost £35 to use this form.

 

After you receive judgement you can write a letter under CPR rules (with in 14 days of receiving Jt.) as posted above and ask for a redetermination, this will not cost any fee.

 

I have no idea if JGJ means this form, i doubt it as he calls it by a different name and says it doesn't have a fee to pay. I don't know what this form is sorry,

Link to post
Share on other sites

joan of arc,

 

My post #337 is exactly as I stated, I have the form in my hand looking at it now, N24 Notice of DEFENDANTS APPLICATION FOR REDETERMINATION. Successfully applied for and a REDETERMINATION obtained. Best of luck. :D

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

 

Well done JGJ,

Is this a form you use at anytime once you have received your judgment as I see that their is no fee to use it?

I'm just interested to know and its helpful for others too.

So far I know the CPR letter has to be done within 14 days after receiving judgment & no fee obviously and N245 can be used at any time after that and has a £35. fee.

 

I find the lack of information from Joans county court appalling, this info is readily available if you google so whats up with that court, they must know, to say they have no idea is dreadful. The court is supposed to explain procedure and tell you about forms available.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

They didn't look solely at my OH income, they took mine into account as well.

 

Hi mightyacorn,

I hope this will make sense,

I had the information straight from a lady who actually goes through the enforcement of debt forms at court.

on my form it asked for my husbands income and mine plus benefits and anything else anyone gives you.

then it said expenses....only include what you pay from your income.

She said to do as the form said and just write, if I wanted to, that all other living expenses ie. morgage/rent etc. were paid by my husband.

I said why do you ask for my oh's income when he is not responsible for my debt?

She said don't worry we ask what your spouses income is but we then subtract that figure (his income ) so in effect it is not included because it is not his debt.

 

Mighty acorn, Was the reason that they took your spouses income into account because you had no income?

If so that means that if one has no income then the OH is liable for the partners debt.

That is the only conclusion I can come to regarding this and your post.

In that case it was a good thing for me that I only work part time.

Doesn't help Joan though.

I googled what happens if you have no income and cannot pay a CCJ.

I found an answer concerning setaside but I won't comment on that as i didn't look into it just a quick google.

 

If I were you Joan I would ring National debt line, I have always found them to be most helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...