Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the National Consumer Service Buying any goods or any services??? A used car? - Paying by cash or bank transfer??? - BIG Fail!Share the love – Tell a friend about the Consumer Action Group - your National Consumer ServiceAre you buying a used car...? Protect yourself – read our used car guideESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Twitter - Why you should open a Twitter account ESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Have we helped you today...? Please help the CAG Had a car accident? Been offered a courtesy car?Follow @Real_CAG Parcel Delivery Insurance is Unlawful - The TimesWhy don't you change your profile picture?? Problem with utilities company or phone/broadband? Begin by sending a statutory request for your personal data. It’s free    Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.× Financial Legal Issues Complete My Profile Dismiss Next Step: Profile Photo (Profile Photo and Cover Photo) Your profile is 0% complete! Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why… The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini' Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.  You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do Rate this topic By citizenB March 4, 2014 in Financial Legal Issues style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks   citizenB Posted March 4, 2014 #1   The questionnaires below provide important information which will allow us to help you. In order to use them, you will have to copy them into your own post and then give us the answers – preferably in red below each question. You can start by overwriting the prompt: "Give answer here" below each question – and your responses should automatically appear in red   Thank you +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++   You have received a claim form.   firstly - read all the posts in this thread FIRST...   then copy this first msg to your thread - and put your answer after each question   In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us]     Which Court have you received the claim from ? Name County Court   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)     Name of the Claimant ? Give answer here   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Give answer here   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. Give answer here   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down. state how many digits the account number has.. Give answer here   What is the total value of the claim? Give answer here   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Give answer here   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Give answer here   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Give answer here Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Give answer here   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Give answer here   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Give answer here   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Give answer here   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Give answer here   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Give answer here   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Give answer here   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Give answer here   Why did you cease payments? Give answer here   What was the date of your last payment? Give answer here   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Give answer here   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Give answer here   What you need to do now.   Answer the questions above   If you have not already done so – send a CCA request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement (If Applicable) (except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)   Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts   Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards     Request 2 - Current Accounts     You may use a CPR part 18 request for any other information (not request documents) that you might require in order to defend yourself. Please note that CPR 18 is specifically for Fast Track claims and although technically the claim has yet to be allocated to a track the claimant may refuse to comply for this reason.   If you require CPR Part 18 - this will need to be drafted specifically.   If you are not planning on defending for one reason or another – then you will need to complete an Income and Expenditure form and contact the Solicitor with your proposal. The N9a is already enclosed in the claim pack for Admittance which should be sent to the solicitor named on the claim form   If you are considering making a partial admittance N9b must be completed and returned to the court. Please note in most cases a partial admittance will result in an automatic CCJ for the amount admitted.   You have received a Claim - What you need to do.pdf1.33 MB · 242 downloads     Before Printing the PDF TIP   If you DO NOT wish to print Page 1 (Cover Page) of the PDF, please ensure to do the following:   Ensure you go to your Printer Settings and set it to 'Print from Page 2' (this way Page 1 (Cover Page) should not print out).   Note: This will save you Ink & Paper     Bookmark   Report 3 weeks later...   AndyOrch Posted March 20, 2014 #2   Once you receive a Court Summons N1   As a defendant in a small claims case it is important that you act quickly and do not ignore the claim form when it arrives. Remember, the claim will proceed anyway even if you don’t respond. If the claim goes against you, it will be very difficult to make a counter claim as you didn’t respond to the initial small claim.   You may be unaware that you are the defendant in a small claims case that a Creditor has bought against you. When the small claims form arrives follow these initial steps:   1: Read the Form Carefully   The detail about the claim that is being bought against you will be in the ‘particulars of claim’ section. If this section isn't completed, or has the words ‘particulars of claim to follow’ take no action now and wait until you are sent details of the claim against you. You may want to consult a lawyer at this stage.   2: Respond in Time   It’s vitally important that you respond to the claim for you have been sent. Remember that there is a 19 day (5 +14) time limit on this to acknowledge the claim.You must submit before the 19 days are up, so post your response with plenty of time.If your intention is to defend the claim in full you get a further 14 days to submit your response ...so 33 days in total.   3: Talk to the Claimant   Just because a small claim has been bought against you and a claim form issued, this doesn’t mean you are not allowed to contact the claimant directly. In fact the court encourages you to try and settle the claim without the need for a court appearance. So, try and resolve your dispute directly with the claimant if you can.   Not Responding to a Small Claim   If you ignore the small claims form when it arrives this can have an adverse impact on your financial status. The court will continue with the small claims lawsuit that is being bought against you even in your absence as this is a legal requirement. When the small claim is processed you will be sent a bill showing the amount you owe and any additional costs. The small claims against you is a legal process that will be recorded on the Register of Judgements, Orders and Fines. This information is used to check your credit, so could have a negative impact when you next apply for any credit. To avoid damaging your credit rating reply to your small claims docket as soon as you can.   How to Respond to Your Small Claims Form   When you received your form from the court you will also have been sent a response pack. In this pack you will see the option that are open to you. These include:   • A dispute claim form. You can use this form if you do not agree that you are liable for the small claim being bought against you and wish to submit a Defence. • Details about how to pay the amount being claimed from you. • Details about how to admit to part of the small claim against you, and how you can ask the claimant for more time to pay.   There are Two Types of Small Claims:   Fixed Amounts:   If the claim against you is for a fixed amount of money your response pack will contain three forms. Form N9 (acknowledgement of Service), form N9A (admission form) and N9B (defence and counterclaim form).   Unspecified Amounts:   If the amount being claimed is unspecified you will be sent forms N9 and N9C (admission form) and N9D (defence and counterclaim form). It is vital that you read the accompanying explanatory notes before choosing which form to send back.   Paying the Small Claim   If you want to make full payment of the amount being claimed against you this amount will be shown on the claim for you have been sent, and will also have details about where to send the money. Don’t forget, this must be done within the 14 day time limit or your case will proceed to the next stage.   In some instances you would like to pay, but need more time, you can give details about the delay you would like on form N9A, which should be in your response pack. It’s also a good idea to read leaflet EX309: The Defendant Admits by claim as this gives more details on this aspect of your case when fixed amounts of money are involved. Leaflet EX308 gives details of cases when unspecified amounts are being claimed against you.   Also please read forms EX326 and EX160A   How to Defend a Claim Against You   Disputed claims are handled by filling in the appropriate form from your response pack. You have three choices: Form N9, N9B or N9D. Read the note accompanying each form carefully to ensure you completely correctly. Pay special attention to the allegations raised on the form. If you don’t respond to each the court will assume you are admitting guilt. Edited April 10, 2014 by stu007 Updated PDF added    1   Bookmark   Report 2 months later...   citizenB   Posted June 5, 2014 #3   PLEASE NOTE - WARNING   Once you have received your claim form - the Court timetable comes into force. Not that of the creditor or claimant. If you have requested information with them after the claim has been issued - or have entered into discussion with them and they say something like "We will put this on hold for a period of time". You cannot and must not ignore the timetable from the court.   This thread should serve as an example   http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?416202&p=4547677#post4547677   The OP in the case above was in communication with the CAG Vodafone rep. A claim was issued during this time. The Rep in good faith said he would ask the Claimant to put things on hold.... they did not.. the OP ignored advice from caggers to continue with the court timetable and did not submit a defence. The claimaint obtained a Judgment by default. Edited June 5, 2014 by citizenB     Bookmark   Report 3 yr AndyOrch changed the title to You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do   style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks  This topic is now closed to further replies.  Share Follow3 Go to topic listing Next unread topic Recently Browsing   1 Cagger hugo1963 1,380 Members Viewed hugo1963 4 minutes ago   lolerz 4 hours ago   vicr76 8 hours ago   Moomoo11 Friday at 18:18   London1971 Friday at 11:26   AndyOrch Friday at 11:13   mollie5549 Thursday at 17:21   zyghom Thursday at 13:26   Magnusinfinity May 15   Newdogg06 May 14   Unique May 13   saberguy May 12   Mycathasfleas May 12   WantJustice May 9   Rain clouds May 8   MoltoModerato May 3   George2024 May 1   Badtimes123 April 30   LouLouDev79 April 29   northmonk April 29   mowbli April 29   WornOut55 April 27   paulhn757 April 24   UsedCarMan April 23   robertobaggio April 23   marksheff April 20   anotheruser0000 April 19   TT98 April 18   gatoradeqaz April 17   Murielme2 April 15   Frontera mixup April 11   BreadAndButter April 9   Karalius April 9   nurjeon03 April 9   Penglings April 8   Nick April 8   Edals April 5   thesixco April 1   lifttheveil March 30   dx100uk March 30   Stripeycat March 28   jon8214 March 27   sharkieuk March 25   HappyHolidays March 24   sandokan March 22   SimplyBeyondWords March 22   supernick90 March 20   iyam71 March 20   Nicky Boy March 18   StoryBoard March 18   Myth_007 March 15   kaze March 12   RodeMan March 8   eskimo123 March 7   JEDIKNIGHTS March 6   persha50 March 6   tobzas March 6   lancashirelad93 March 6   HappyDay2222 March 3   1penny March 3   nat8808 March 2   FTMDave March 1   lynzmeek February 25   Mike Mechanic February 25   Ethel Street February 24   Outoftoon February 23   anna may February 22   PJB5 February 22   iamgnome February 21   SweetCaroline February 20   EdinburghDude February 19   Grgw44 February 18   linbren03 February 15   whittymags February 9   flembo45 February 7   comebackjimmy February 6   MontyIsInnocent February 4   libra007 February 1   Eamonn77 January 31   xtonehari January 30   hlh49421 January 30   ceeferace January 29   catscratch January 29   Melbel January 25   Suggababe January 19   yorkshire_lufc January 17   ljrobinson69 January 16   makkyinuk January 15   yogii January 14   MadMat January 12   rocky_sharma January 4   mrskippy21 January 3   lookinforinfo December 29, 2023   europa16 December 28, 2023   MrsSl December 27, 2023   KP44UK December 23, 2023   Montego December 22, 2023   Worazz December 21, 2023   StopTheBullies December 21, 2023   hitman126 December 20, 2023   +1280 More   Have we helped you ...?                     Contact Us   Cookies Copyright Reclaim the Right Ltd - reg: 05783665Powered by Invision Community IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.  
    • ITV News have got hold of an email and recording of a phone call between Vennells and Ron Warmington of Second Sight. People in the know are saying it's smoking gun everyone's been looking for. I love that this has come out the day before she appears at the inquiry. This should be interesting under oath. Paula Vennells' 'smoking gun' email reveals Post Office 'cover-up' | ITV News WWW.ITV.COM ITV News has acquired an email and recording of a phone call that suggests the former Post Office boss was aware of issues with the Horizon system...  
    • I think you may as well take the opportunity in your letter to tell them that if they won't take responsibility for it then you will see quotations for the repair, provide copies of the quotations to them and then proceed with your own repair and recover the money back from them in the courts if necessary. Separately, can I ask you whether this is the car that you then bought unseen and at some distance from you? Has it come with an MOT and if so what date was the MOT and who gave it the MOT? Have you read our used car guide
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If none of you has had a reduction in your variable accounts in the last couple of years, would that not be grounds for operating an unfair relationship.

 

Also, as they are supposed to provide a copy of the original agreement when they alter your interest rates [and kindly confirmed by Justice Waksman in Carey]

S234.[4] If an agreement has been varied by the creditor under a unilateral power of variation, the creditor must still provide a copy of the original agreement, as well as the varied terms

then surely the only interest rate that applies is the original one.

Unless of course they have supplied the agreement copy.

Edited by lookinforinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Sorry to butt in!

 

If none of you has had a reduction in your variable accounts in the last couple of years, would that not be grounds for operating an unfair relationship.

 

Also, as they are supposed to provide a copy of the original agreement when they alter your interest rates [and kindly confirmed by Justice Waksman in Carey]

S234.[4] If an agreement has been varied by the creditor under a unilateral power of variation, the creditor must still provide a copy of the original agreement, as well as the varied terms [/red]

 

then surely the only interest rate that applies is the original one.

Unless of course they have supplied the agreement copy.

 

Does this not apply for every mortgage or charge on your property?

 

If so every mortgage rate change I have evr had from any mortgage provider does not count?!!!

 

How would we ever bring this to account?

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to butt in!

Does this not apply for every mortgage or charge on your property?

 

If so every mortgage rate change I have evr had from any mortgage provider does not count?!!!

How would we ever bring this to account?Cupcake

 

Well it certainly applies to agreements regulated by the CCA and it should also cover those loans/mortgages that are part regulated by the Act too.

 

Not so sure about totally unregulated agreements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can they justify different rates for different loans with rises at different times? :confused: Don't lenders usually announce AN interest rate increase or decrease for ALL their borrowers, at like the same time :confused:

 

I believe reputable ones do - but as I am with Swift Swerve (sorry freudian) 1st Ltd I couldn't tell you.:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

You were lucky sweetjane ...we had 3 interest rate hikes in 2007 .. June .August ..October..post exact amount later

 

sparkie

 

well they clearly like me more because I had 5! It must be because Im special ;):p

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I'm sure you've been called special for a number of reasons :D

 

Well I think it's because when I add up 2+2 I get 4. what can I say, I have a beautifull mind. I think Swift must be in awe of my calculations :D

 

I actually got them to admit once that I was in actual fact £789.89 in credit and then they hung up on me half way through and couldn't locate who I spoke to when I rang back 2 mins later.

 

They also said they weren't discriminating against me. I said I knew they weren't and that they treated ALL their customers this way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Busterg am I right in saying that you have a Swft 1st/First Ltd mortgage but your court papers say you were sued by Swift Advances Plc...if so the wrong company sued you and that is cancellable if you make an application to the Court.

 

sparkie

 

 

sparkie

 

Swift 1st/First took out the possession summons but Swift Advances were granted the possession order. My remortage was with Swift 1st Ltd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Swift 1st/First took out the possession summons but Swift Advances were granted the possession order. My remortage was with Swift 1st Ltd.

 

There are two arguments here then

 

1.Swift 1st Ltd must have sold your morgae to Swift Advances Plc which they can't because they are not FSA registered ...so that leaves ..

 

2..The possession order has been granted to the wrong company and must be absolutely unlawful and the Court has made a serious error in law and judgement and can be appealed against with absolute certainty. In my "obnoxious" opinion as usual:D:D:D

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two arguments here then

 

1.Swift 1st Ltd must have sold your morgae to Swift Advances Plc which they can't because they are not FSA registered ...so that leaves ..

 

2..The possession order has been granted to the wrong company and must be absolutely unlawful and the Court has made a serious error in law and judgement and can be appealed against with absolute certainty. In my "obnoxious" opinion as usual:D:D:D

 

sparkie

 

Thanks Sparkie - just mailed you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sparkie - just mailed you.

 

 

HI busterg.

 

Got your docs .do you mind if I send them on to the "Special Person" we have coming on Tuesday......he will absolutely LOVE this. It will be to your benefit I am certain of that.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Swift Group of companies specialise in the non-conforming secured lending market. Our loans range from £7,000 up to £50,000 and all our loans have been specially designed by us for people whose circumstances mean that traditional high street lenders can't help.

 

Here they say they only lend up to £50.000.........How many have loans over this amount???

 

Who we are

We are part of the Alchemy Group and are funded by many of the leading banks in the UK.

The Alchemy Group are not registerd with the Office of Fair Trading

Who checks up on us?

Image6.gifOur aim is simple & to provide you with the highest standards in our industry with unsurpassed levels of customer service. All of our products are totally transparent - We are regulated by The Financial Services Authority (look us up in the FSA register under reference 304896)

 

They say the Swift Group are regulated by the FSA ....not true

Thereis no entry on the FSA register of "The Swift Group" A false misrepresentation of fact.......this number is allocated to Swift 1st Limited for FSA regulated mortgages

and we are licenced by The Office of Fair Trading.

The Swift Group design all their loans....but they have not got a licence to carry out consumer credit business

 

The Swift Group are not licenced by the Office of Fair Trading, another false misrepresentatio of fact.......only Swift Advances Plc hold that licence..........no other name is on it.

 

In addition we are also members of the following trade associations and subscribe to their codes of practice - the Council of Mortgage Lenders, and the Finance and Leasing Association (go to Information for Consumers - Finance & Leasing Association to download the Code relevant to your agreement).

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI busterg.

 

Got your docs .do you mind if I send them on to the "Special Person" we have coming on Tuesday......he will absolutely LOVE this. It will be to your benefit I am certain of that.

 

sparkie

 

Nope - no problem at all. If it can help then Im all for it. I didn't have this to hand until I picked up after I spoke with a Special Person.:D

 

Thanks for your help. I really appreciate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have folks noted that your agreement states "Quote"

" Any brokers fee is not a condition of the loan etc etc"

BUT

In their Welcome letter that comes with your cheque it states "Quote"

 

"In line with your instructions and the terms of loan agreement,we have made the following deductions etc etc etc"

 

Point 1...When did any of us give these specific instructions? ( I don't think so) Have they ever produced these instructions. ( I don't think so either)

 

Point 2...How can they say the a) "the brokers fees are not part of the loan"....and then say "as per terms of the loan agreement" ....If they are not part of the loan ...then they can't be part of the terms of the agreement.

 

Totally misleading and a deliberate contradictory misrepresentaion of facts

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Look who Kestrel Holdings Ltd really are

 

Augusta Closing of $5 Million Private Placement

 

April 18, 2009 Filed Under: Copper Mining, Lithium Mining, Mining Investment, Mining Stocks, Molybdenum Mining

augusta-closing-of-5-million-private-placement-70x70.jpg

Augusta Resource Corporation announces the closing of a non-brokered private placement of 3.35 million units at a price of $1.50 per unit for gross proceeds of $5,025,000. The transaction is fully subscribed by Kestrel Holdings Ltd., a private company 100% held by Vancouver mining entrepreneur Ross Beaty. Each unit comprises one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant entitling... [/url]

Tag: peninsula corp vancouver sam, peninsula 2010, peninsula vancouver magid, ross beaty augusta, privateplacement mining

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sent this letter to the OFT.it is quite explanatory ..I would ask folks to check out their Court bundles subitted by Swift Advances Plc.

 

sparkie

 

 

 

23 March 2010

 

To Mr David Blocksidge

Office of FDair Trding

 

Dear Mr Blocksidge,

 

I apologise for further correspondence with regard to the ongoing issues and complaints about Swift Advances Plc.

 

I would like to make you aware of the following, Swift Advances Plc and Swift 1st Ltd are owned by Kestrel Acquisitions Ltd who are in turn owned by the Holding company of the whole Group……. Kestrel Holdings Ltd.

 

Point One.

If you try to locate any information about Kestrel Acquisitions Ltd by way of a normal search of the internet, the search will come up blank, as if they do not exist.

 

Point Two

If you search for Kestrel Holdings Ltd the search comes up with this search result.

Augusta Closing of $5 Million Private Placement

 

April 18, 2009 Filed Under: Copper Mining, Lithium Mining, Mining Investment, Mining Stocks, Molybdenum Mining

 

Augusta Resource Corporation announces the closing of a non-brokered private placement of 3.35 million units at a price of $1.50 per unit for gross proceeds of $5,025,000. The transaction is fully subscribed by Kestrel Holdings Ltd., a private company 100% held by Vancouver mining entrepreneur Ross Beaty. Each unit comprises one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant entitling...

 

I just wish to draw your attention to this as the operations of this English group of companies called Kestrel Holdings Ltd is more than a little murky, could this be the reason that the OFT, FSA & the ICO have never heard of these companies, in international law, who would be responsible for the actions of the other?

 

Point Three

This is the point of most serious concern to me and ALL other Swift Advances Plc customers. In court bundles ( ours included) I have evidence that documents submitted as copies of original documents have been altered, i.e….. have been changed and altered manually to convince the Courts they have been issued by Swift Advances Plc, I attach one specific important one, our default notice, this was submitted by Swift Advances Plc in their Court documents in the possession proceedings taken out against us, you will note that the Swift Advances Plc name has been “TYPED” manually at the top. They have all been tampered with

 

If this had been a true copy of that notice it would have been on Swift Advances Plc headed paper, but as far as I can discover no one has received any letters headed Swift Advances Plc, ( I may be wrong on this ) this default notice was received from Swift Advances, but you will note that all this information has been deliberately removed, the address The Swift Group etc etc has also been deliberately removed.

 

Tampering with documents submitted to a court is I believe a criminal offence

 

It must be seen that Swift Advances Plc do not involve themselves in the operations and running of accounts sending letters and such, all this is done under the trading style of Swift Advances, but they are not on Swift Advances plc CCA licence

Yours sincerely

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

SWFTADVANCESPlcCOPYDEFAULT-1.jpg

 

This shows how they have removed all the headings by hand deliberately in an attempt to show it was issued by Swift Advances Plc... they have removed all refernce to Swift Advances & The Swift Logo.........and then Typed in Swift Advances Plc and submitted it as a copy of the original. I have the original I am off to the police with this as soon as I can.......and making my leagl team aware of all this

 

Caught out again

 

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why they have to alter the default notice from Swift Advances to Swift Advance Plc is because of clause 6

"We will recover possession of the land and recover the security"

 

Because it was issued by Swift Advances they could not recover the possession because Swift Advances ( who issued the default) do not exist so could not issue proceedings under this default only Swift Advances Plc could do that.

 

You will note that it says we must pay Swift Advances Plc not Swift Advances for reason once again Swift Advances do not exist .......and have no Bank account for any monies to be paid into....... I only wish I had paid Swift Advances and see who's Bank account that would have been processed through,...... if it had been Swift Advances Plc's account now that would have been a beauty.

 

As that "Merecat" says in the advert ......."SIMPLES"!!!;):D:D

 

 

sparkie

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
added notes & spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why they have to alter the default notice from Swift Advances to Swift Advance Plc is because of clause 6

"We will recover possession of the land and recover the security"

 

Because it was issued by Swift Advances they could not recover the possession because Swift Advances ( who issued the default) do not exist so could not issue proceedings under this default only Swift Advances Plc could do that.

 

You will note that it says we must pay Swift Advances Plc not Swift Advances for reason once again Swift Advances do not exist .......and have no Bank account for any monies to be paid into....... I only wish I had paid Swift Advances and see who's Bank account that would have been processed through,...... if it had been Swift Advaces Plc's account now that would have been a beauty.

 

As that "Merecat" says in the advert ......."SIMPLES"!!!;):D:D

 

 

sparkie

 

sparkie

 

I never got that type of default notice. I got a we'll get sols to write you if you don't reply in 10 days.....which I again i didn't get but received a copy of from the docs I obtained from court a couple of weeks ago. I thought I was special as well. Damm!

 

However, whilst in the process of playing with my dinasaur (sp) bone :grin: I think I can help with thess payments to Swift advances lark. I've been paying both Swifts - 1st Ltd and advances plc.

 

Call me! when you get a minute - busy with my bone! :-D:-D You can have my statements no problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allready had a reply to my e-mail to David Blocksidge at the OFT it was from Edward Allie had replies from him before, so I sent him a little follow u e-mail.....move over with that bone busterg:D:D

 

To

Mr Edward Allie

The Office of Fair Trading

 

Dear Mr Allie,

 

Thank you for your reply to my e-mail to Mr Blocksidge, I di attempt to send it to you but delivery failed for some reason that is why I sent it to Mr Blocksidge, how ever I forgot to attach a copy of the original default notice, I attach that to this e-mail.

 

I would like to point out the reason I believe that the original is tampered with and altered is the statement in clause 6 of that default notice, which includes this

"we will recover possession of the land and enforce the security"

 

Swift Advances cannot recover possession and/or enforce the security as they do not exist, so in order to convince a court they alter the default notice and present it as if Swift Advances Plc had issued it which, is far from the truth.

 

I end with the fact that not one Swift Advaces Plc customer to my knowledge and I am in contact with a lot of them have ever recieved a letter from Swift Advances Plc.

 

It appears that they are the ones that hold the licence issued by your office but do not carry out any of the CC activities the licence is issued for .....this is all carried out by their trading styles and named entities who are not on their licence, who as I have stated many times before do not legally exist.

 

I hope that the OFT will take great note of this, and treat it with the seriosness in my humble opinion it deserves

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

sparkie

 

Come on you guys send more stuff to the OFT .you must have something!!!! I've been sending them stuff since August 2007

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...