Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton  Name of the Claimant ? lowell Solicitors : Overdales solicitors  How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  13 may 2024 What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 1. the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account (16 digits) 2. The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. 3. The debt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  4. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?   Not to my knowledge. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online but it was for a smaller amount they kept on increasing this with me asking Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. It was assigned to a debt collection agency  Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes I also made offers to pay original creditor a smaller amount but was not replied to Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant and got a less paid job I also spent some time on furlough during covid and spent some 3 months on ssp off work. What was the date of your last payment? May 2021 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes at the time I communicated with all my creditor's that I was running out of funds to pay the original agreements once my redundancy money ran out that was when my accounts defaulted. I then wrote to all my creditor's with pro rata offers of payments but debt collectors took over the accounts.
    • Just an update for all. I received about a letter every other week, increasing in threat levels. Then I hadn't had one for a about two weeks, then Saturday received a carbon copy of the very first letter they sent me in February. Made me laugh, rinse and repeat. 
    • So, your response was not received by the SCP as you did not send it with a valid stamp. Therefore, from my two option in post #14, the first option is the only one available to you, but you do not have the option of asking to be sentenced at the fixed penalty level as the reason the SCP did not receive your response was down to you. Here's a reminder of what to do: Respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box state that you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. This is a tried and tested method to deal with your problem and is almost always successful. Before the pandemic it was necessary to attend court to do this "deal" because it needs the agreement of the police prosecutor.. During the pandemic courts made every effort to have as few  people as possible attend and they began doing this deal under the "Single Justice" procedure without the defendant's attendance. Some courts have carried this procedure on whilst others have reverted to a personal attendance being necessary. If you are required to attend, your case will be taken out of the SJ procedure and you will be given a date for a hearing in the normal Magistrates' Court. If that is the way they do it in the area involved you will have to attend, see the prosecutor and offer your "deal" in person. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning all,

 

Swift Advances plc do not hold a Consumer credit licence. I believe this may give them great difficulty in pursuing debts, but I'm researching that.

 

Best wishes

 

 

Dougal

Sorry evryone I was hoping against hope ...BUT I found out they do ...it took me a long while of digging and searching...but I found it ...so that's out of the intray....

 

Their licence Number is 0391618 and it is a full and complete one with two "minor mistakes" on it

 

Apologies for misleading folks. But we have some more ammo in transit at the moment ...which could be very interesting.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Completely agree Sparkie.....if they are saying THEY pay brokers fees and then claim back this against tax, then i'd say this could be a highly questionable practice.....very interesting...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The exact words from their Directors report says

 

" Fees and commissions payable mainly relate tp broker amortisation. This increased to 19.2m in 2008 (2007 £14.7) reflecting the growth in the loan book".

 

English dictionary meaning ....payments of debts or liabilities.

 

[EDIT]

sparkie

Edited by alanfromderby
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spotted a VERY VERY interesting entry also..now get this

 

" The company has entered into interest rate cap contract to provide a hedge against increases in interest rates"

 

This means that they are completely out of order increasing our interest rate on the agreements to "refelect the cost of their borrowing" the cost of their borrowing never goes up...because their interest rate is capped /fixed.

 

What about that then folks???:(;):)

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just told most of this to my solicitor.....................he nearly fell off his chair and said that is "Manner from Heaven" to him ....he's got straight on to it doing some serious investigating..Heavy stuff he said:D:D:D

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what it says in the Directors report of Swift Advances Plc 2007 to 2008 accounts lodged with Companies House.

19.2 million was paid in fees and commission to Brokers

This completely contradicts what Mark White ( who should change his name to "Cilla's" stage name BLACK") said under oath in my Court case, that Swift do not pay commission to Brokers.

 

regencycommission3 picture by overdone1 - Photobucket

 

Well my brokers (Regency) did not declare a commission had been paid to them until after the deal was signed. My letter (R/D) to Regency, dated 12 May 2009, about the amount, to confirm, was never replied to.

 

Two days ago I wrote to Swift for a refund of two payments, each of £135 for title indemnity Insurance. (R/D). They have not replied yet but I wanna see how they wriggle out of that.

Edited by overdone
clarity

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also are connected with each other, in fact all are in the same Building and are linked through the directors

 

Swift Advances Plc Arcadia House 01277-359420

Companies House

Registration Number: 1800474

 

Swift 1ST Ltd. Arcadia House 0845-074-8811

Companies House

Registration Number: 5020019

 

Kestrel Holdings Ltd. Arcadia House 08450-748811

Companies House

Registration Number: 5055802

 

Kestrel Acquisitions Ltd. Arcadia House Tel ????

Companies House

Registration Number: 5055827

 

Kestrel Loans No 1 Ltd. Arcadia House Tel ?????

Companies House

Registration Number: 5143638

 

Kestrel Loans No 3 Ltd. Arcadia House Tel ???

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on Brokers fees that Swift say in their Directors report THEY PAY THEM at least they have claimed them back off the taxman.

 

I have therefore written to HMRC and asked them to get clarification as to the complete breakdown of fee they have paid to brokers and commission they have paid to brokers what percentages to what brokers ..i.e the list of brokers names and the sums paid and on what dates.

 

Its all very well Swift saying to us borrowers we are not giving you documents such as underwriting sheet title indemity etc etc ...lets see them tell HMRC you are not seeing this or you are not seeing that:D:D

 

What folks must realise is the impact on all the loan agreements Swift have out if they have claimed our brokers fees as a tax concession.........everyone is void because of unlawful transactions on the agreement itself. You have paid the brokers fees and Swift have claimed to HMRC that they have paid them ....very very dodgy dealings afoot

 

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

To whom it may concern.... hopefully you have googled this and came across a name you know, or one of your workmates knows something.

I am not into those friends united or facebook etc, here is just a few surnames of a few people I am trying to track and possible friends who worked at, still do, or even know some of these contacts,

I have a friend possibly already has been in touch with most of these contacts however if you think you can help sure give her a buzz on 07542391940 leave a wee message someone will get back to you

Rosenberg , Barwick, woolcott , Webster , Gateley, White, Strictley, Roach, Myers, Stubbs, Northern Trust Fiduciary Service Guernsey Ltd, Kestrel Holdings Ltd, Kestrel Acquisitions Ltd, Alchemy Partners Nominees , Alchemy Partners `Guernsey` Ltd , Kestrel Advances Ltd, Indico Capital IV Limited Partnership Sunny Lo Ingram, Slade , Ally Swift Advanves Plc, Swift 1st Limited, Kestrel Loans No 1 Limited Jumping developments ltd, just a few off the top of my head oh and `Sam` havent heard from you lately??

Edited by pkelly

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They claimed over 14 million in 2006/2007 and over 19 million in 2007/2008 so overdones, landys, and a lot of others can consider that their Swift agreementt could and most likely is void.

 

sparkie

Just noticed on my letter from Regency Brokers that the commission they receive was decalred to me about 3 weeks before the mortgage was completed. I signed the original agreement 5 weeks before the mortgage was completed. Therefor, regency notified me about their commision after signing. This does, I understand, affect the legal standing in my favour?

Edited by overdone
clarity

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on Brokers fees that Swift say in their Directors report THEY PAY THEM at least they have claimed them back off the taxman.

 

I have therefore written to HMRC and asked them to get clarification as to the complete breakdown of fee they have paid to brokers and commission they have paid to brokers what percentages to what brokers ..i.e the list of brokers names and the sums paid and on what dates.

 

Its all very well Swift saying to us borrowers we are not giving you documents such as underwriting sheet title indemity etc etc ...lets see them tell HMRC you are not seeing this or you are not seeing that:D:D

 

What folks must realise is the impact on all the loan agreements Swift have out if they have claimed our brokers fees as a tax concession.........everyone is void because of unlawful transactions on the agreement itself. You have paid the brokers fees and Swift have claimed to HMRC that they have paid them ....very very dodgy dealings afoot

 

 

sparkie

 

Hi Sparkie,

I like your style, BUT will HMRC give you the info you want? Is it not privileged information and therefore protected?

 

I am not sure of the position HMRC are in at his point and was hoping you could help me?

 

MY own thoughts/track concern Mr Matthew Payne, and I am sure that a correctly worded letter to the SRA (Solicitors Regulation Authority) may well give him some long deserved ( and I am sure unwelcome) investigation.

 

What do you think?

 

All the best

 

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

In today's Guardian Richard Alderman new Serious Fraud Office Chief is quoted as saying he insisted there was no complex fraud he would shy away from, and that the SFO was already very focused – in combination with the Financial Services Authority and the Serious and Organised Crime Agency – on the lightly regulated hedge fund industry. Hopefully this will extend to companies like Swift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got some good news today re reporting to serious crime squad..........there will be things aready afoot with them, in the near future!!!!!

good on ya mate pity they would not contact someone in our wee group, we know a lot they dont could you suggest this

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

As an ex Police Officer would you anyone like me to make the initial approach to the SFO?

 

I would be honoured and delighted to start the ball rolling.......

 

Best wishes to all

 

 

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

As an ex Police Officer would you anyone like me to make the initial approach to the SFO?

 

I would be honoured and delighted to start the ball rolling.......

 

Best wishes to all

 

 

Dougal

I am all on for that, could not be better, we would trust you no problem

Edited by pkelly

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

As an ex Police Officer would you anyone like me to make the initial approach to the SFO?

 

I would be honoured and delighted to start the ball rolling.......

 

Best wishes to all

 

 

Dougal

 

 

Hi Dougal:)

 

That sounds like a great idea - count me in!

 

Regards,

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed on my letter from Regency Brokers that the commission they receive was decalred to me about 3 weeks before the mortgage was completed. I signed the original agreement 5 weeks before the mortgage was completed. Therefor, regency notified me about their commision after signing. This does, I understand, affect the legal standing in my favour?

Does anyone remember the piece of case law where a judge says, commission to a broker, is a conflict of interest? Also, another case where the judge defines where "Secret Commission" applies? I want to write a letter to Swift to try and reclaim this, because I think I have a case. I think I found it. Post 494.

Edited by overdone
add info

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...