Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim

[Sparkie1723]

So does that mean KPMG might have a UK bill to settle too Sparkie if problems are not being picked up when accounts are audited?

 

It means big problems for all really sweetjane..........we have discovered so many discrepancies and irregularities in all these accounts which are still being examined by chartered accountants.

 

One of the ones we ourselves have spotted is MR Webster has signed Swifts last years accounts (which is the same as a statement of truth) and it is claimed that over £1.6 million was saved on their wage Bill by reducing/laying off 14 staff.

 

But Kestrel Holdings accounts, which is the amalgamated accouts for the whole group state they only saved £210.00, which is a far more realistic figure than the figure Mr Webster states in his accounts.

 

KPMG then audited these accounts ..questions are being asked why did KPMG not spot this BIG sum of money "error" shall we say.........we did quite easily.

 

Just this is enough for the Assett recovery to ask questions and that the lads in N Ireland are going to go for unless Swift put their dispute to bed,because it wull go National.

 

sparkie

Edited November 24, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Smarterchick]

It means big problems for all really sweetjane..........we have discovered so many discrepancies and irregularities in all these accounts which are still being examined by chartered accountants.

 

One of the ones we ourselves have spotted is MR Webster has signed Swifts last years accounts (which is the same as a statement of truth) and it is claimed that over £1.6 million was saved on their wage Bill by reducing/laying off 14 staff.

 

But Kestrel Holdings accounts, which is the amalgamated accouts for the whole group state they only saved £210.00, which is a far more realistic figure than the figure Mr Webster states in his accounts.

 

KPMG then audited these accounts ..questions are being asked why did KPMG not spot this BIG sum of money "error" shall we say.........we did quite easily.

 

Just this is enough for the Assett recovery to ask questions and that the lads in N Ireland are going to go for unless Swift put their dispute to bed,because it wull go National.

 

sparkie

 

Be interesting to know what comes back from the solicitors of theirs sparkie on these borrowings...few red faces I bet?

[Sparkie1723]

....Hot off the Press N.Ireland case adjourned till 18th December

 

sparkie

[Smarterchick]

....Hot off the Press N.Ireland case adjourned till 18th December

 

sparkie

 

Geez, that's the last day before Christmas week...

[Sparkie1723]

Geez, that's the last day before Christmas week...

 

Swift looking for some Xmas presents ...more peoples houses!!!

[Sparkie1723]

The Rabbits are out again.......where's sparkle?? Snoop! snoop! snoop! snoop!!!!!

[sweetjane]

Do you know why it was adjourned?

[pkelly]

na it wasnt this was only the start now the two cases were put together and one sol to do both

never geard full story but this means now swift are not only being challanced for the 1st time but they have to fight 2 different cases at once, lol bet noone heard of this before

[pkelly]

lads still laughing this is what they expected only better dont know what happened but will hear later hopefully

they forced swift into putting off the 1st case and into this situation

[pkelly]

So There You Are Sparkle Tell Tony When He Comes Back Tomorrow To Expect A Wee Call

Then Get Your Coats And Bugger Off Its Quitting Time

[pkelly]

oops rabbits about lol oh just to let you know your sol said only a few words but is worse than white lol he f ed up already lol roll on the 18th:)

silly Piers Morgan

[Sparkie1723]

oops rabbits about lol oh just to let you know your sol said only a few words but is worse than white lol he f ed up already lol roll on the 18th:)

silly twit

 

 

What our delightful friend pkelly means is....that Swifts solicitor has already misled the court at this very brief hearing ..he stated something to the Master that can be proved absolute CRAP.:D:D and this was on a very small but important point.....so from now on he's got it all wrong he will be making continous conflicting statemnts that make the Master throw wobbler with him.. I know and I wasnt there BUT I will be at the full trial as a material witness.

 

Actually it was two

 

sparkie

[sweetjane]

I see there were other Swift cases in NI this pm: 5 Swift Advances and 1 Swift 1st - did the boys manage to speak to the others?

[Dougal16T]

Best wishes from Dougal to the NI Boys

 

All the best to everyone else, and let's hope tomorrow is what we have been waiting for....!!

 

Dougal

[Dougal16T]

Best wishes from Dougal for 18th Dec to the NI Boys

 

All the best to everyone else, and let's hope tomorrow at the House of Lords is what we have been waiting for....!!

 

Dougal

Edited November 24, 2009 by Dougal16T
Missed out date in previous post......and forgot how to edit!!!

[Sparkie1723]

Best wishes from Dougal for 18th Dec to the NI Boys

 

All the best to everyone else, and let's hope tomorrow at the House of Lords is what we have been waiting for....!!

 

Dougal

 

 

Would'nt count on it Dougal ..remember most of these Lords have big shares in Banks etc..............they will not let the share prices go down any more ...............as the Queen said once there are things that go on that even she is never privvy to.

 

You have seen the latest trend of cases judged by logical thinking sensible Judges such as Judge Halbert being overturned by the hierarchy.

 

sparkie

[Dougal16T]

EVENING ALL and SPARKIE,

 

So, it's still good luck and very best wishes to the NI Boys, and don't count your chickens for the rest of us..... Remember this though : 'He who laughs last, laughs longest'.

 

As always

 

Dougal

Edited November 24, 2009 by Dougal16T
Missed a bit out...another detention.....

[pkelly]

Hi folks

Yep swift are down and out the lads have no problem with the agreement itself in fact now its impossible for the swifties to tell lies based on just 1 agreement alone, the lads have forged signatures, fake licences, conflicting statements from directors in not only swift but other bigger birdies, proof of account fraud, the list is endless.

they said they want to hit them on all your behalf, after the stories they have heard and the lives ruined I understand why.

regardless of how their case developes I can assure you SWIFT and co will pay for what they have done to each and everyone of you, thats a promise they said,

as for Sparkies case he alone will run rings around that nest of vipers, in fact it would be worth going to see, he is ubelievable, better than anylegal team especially swifts,

and this time he is fully loaded god pity them :grin:

[cantona1509]

Happy days!

[overdone]

As for Sparkies case he alone will run rings around that nest of vipers, in fact it would be worth going to see, he is ubelievable, better than anylegal team especially swifts, and this time he is fully loaded god pity them :grin:

How do we get to see Sparkie in Action? Perhaps some of his genius can rub off on me.

[sunray001]

PKelly, way 2 much pochine.

 

Looks like Swift have still got a load of wiggle room.

 

But You can only wiggle for so long?

 

:-):-):-)

[pkelly]

yep getting exiting they cant wait the lads have things going as expected now they will attack lol when and how they want lol

[pkelly]

Swift drove backwards thru their bank's drive-thru lane to see if I could

get any money back

[Sparkie1723]

This is what I will be using against Mark White when he stated Swift do not pay commission and do not operate agencies........and furthermore in the signed statement of truth in the Disclosure CPR objected to me seeing the correspondence between THEIR AGENTS

 

 

case KJM Superbikes v Hinton [2008] EWHC 1280

 

KJM appealed to the Court of Appeal against the judge’s decision refusing permission to bring contempt of court proceedings against Mr Hinton. Lord Justice Moore-Bick allowed the appeal and Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Mummery agreed with his reasons for doing so. The primary question was whether it was in the public interest for the contempt of court proceedings to be pursued against Mr. Hinton. He stated that “a witness who knowingly makes a false statement in the course of giving evidence orally or in an affidavit does not expose himself to an action for damages at the suit of anyone injured as a result, but he does expose himself to the risk of prosecution for perjury and as such is publicly accountable for his attempt to interfere with the course of justice.” He said that giving a private person permission to pursue proceedings for contempt “allows that person to act in a public rather than a private role…….to pursue public interest”.

 

 

 

This case therefore serves as a timely reminder to signatories to statements of truth and those advising them to ensure that the facts stated in the document concerned are true. A failure to do so can expose the signatory to criminal proceedings for contempt of court and if convicted, the sentence can include imprisonment, a fine and/or a seizure of assets. Not only that, but the credibility of the signatory as a witness will be destroyed and the Court is unlikely to accept as true other parts of his or her evidence. Witness statements and statements of case should therefore be read thoroughly before signature and amendments made to ensure that the document is factually correct.

Edited November 25, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

Hullo sparkle pass it on to your legl department Please