Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim

[pkelly 177]

Swift drove backwards thru their bank's drive-thru lane to see if I could

get any money back

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

This is what I will be using against Mark White when he stated Swift do not pay commission and do not operate agencies........and furthermore in the signed statement of truth in the Disclosure CPR objected to me seeing the correspondence between THEIR AGENTS

 

 

case KJM Superbikes v Hinton [2008] EWHC 1280

 

KJM appealed to the Court of Appeal against the judge’s decision refusing permission to bring contempt of court proceedings against Mr Hinton. Lord Justice Moore-Bick allowed the appeal and Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Mummery agreed with his reasons for doing so. The primary question was whether it was in the public interest for the contempt of court proceedings to be pursued against Mr. Hinton. He stated that “a witness who knowingly makes a false statement in the course of giving evidence orally or in an affidavit does not expose himself to an action for damages at the suit of anyone injured as a result, but he does expose himself to the risk of prosecution for perjury and as such is publicly accountable for his attempt to interfere with the course of justice.” He said that giving a private person permission to pursue proceedings for contempt “allows that person to act in a public rather than a private role…….to pursue public interest”.

 

 

 

This case therefore serves as a timely reminder to signatories to statements of truth and those advising them to ensure that the facts stated in the document concerned are true. A failure to do so can expose the signatory to criminal proceedings for contempt of court and if convicted, the sentence can include imprisonment, a fine and/or a seizure of assets. Not only that, but the credibility of the signatory as a witness will be destroyed and the Court is unlikely to accept as true other parts of his or her evidence. Witness statements and statements of case should therefore be read thoroughly before signature and amendments made to ensure that the document is factually correct.

Edited November 25, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

Hullo sparkle pass it on to your legl department Please

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

The public interest is ....................that Mark White has made similar untrue statements in other courts of law.......... and on his statements peoples property have been possessed......... and it must stop ........those people who have had them possessed on his statements containing falsehoods should have the full value of thei property paid back to them in compensation.

 

sparkie

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

The lads in N.Ireland will have some real hot News in an hour or so ...........They are still in a BIG BIG meeting with powerful people so can't tell yet............ but its good stuff. Keep watching this space!!!

 

sparkie

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

Another Document I have got that I didn't have to use in my previous Court case Swift took against us is a screen shot taken off the Agents/Brokers computer system..........it has a box that asks on it have any other lenders been contacted.......ITS BLANK ..meaning this Agent went straight to Swift ..............and didn't shop around for a better deal for us..............another screen shot shows a box with the the word Commission Paid ....guess what ........its filled in showing Swift did pay them commission.....another document to show Mark White did not tell the truth under oath ...you can't dispute documentray evidence can you. These agents went bust in April 2008

 

Commission is only paid to AGENTS of the Lender.Borrowers don't pay commission direct the lender does, all this exra evidence is for the big hearing I'll request, I've got loads of it

 

sparkie

Edited November 25, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[42man 8,347]

Excellent Sparks....!!

[Apollo18 1]

Your evidence seems to be coming along nicely Sparkie!

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

Hi Appollo18,

 

I have only got to pove just one of the many false misleading statements by Mark White to the Court .......and I am convinced I will ..........he will then feel the full weight of the Court will fall on him, but what follows from that is that every case that he has given evidence in and stated the same in can be called into question...... because he goes into a pre-hearsed oral recitation in the witness box....and everyone can then use it to have their judgements overturned. ........the consequences of this I leave to everyones thoughts

 

I know Swift will put up a fight................ but they are up against TOO much damming evidence to show that he does not tell the truth under oath let alone in his statements of truth, I will be using one of his own CEO Mr John Webster statements to prove it.

 

sparkie

Edited November 25, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[pkelly 177]

This is what I will be using against Mark White when he stated Swift do not pay commission and do not operate agencies........and furthermore in the signed statement of truth in the Disclosure CPR objected to me seeing the correspondence between THEIR AGENTS

 

 

case KJM Superbikes v Hinton [2008] EWHC 1280

 

KJM appealed to the Court of Appeal against the judge’s decision refusing permission to bring contempt of court proceedings against Mr Hinton. Lord Justice Moore-Bick allowed the appeal and Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Mummery agreed with his reasons for doing so. The primary question was whether it was in the public interest for the contempt of court proceedings to be pursued against Mr. Hinton. He stated that “a witness who knowingly makes a false statement in the course of giving evidence orally or in an affidavit does not expose himself to an action for damages at the suit of anyone injured as a result, but he does expose himself to the risk of prosecution for perjury and as such is publicly accountable for his attempt to interfere with the course of justice.” He said that giving a private person permission to pursue proceedings for contempt “allows that person to act in a public rather than a private role…….to pursue public interest”.

 

 

 

This case therefore serves as a timely reminder to signatories to statements of truth and those advising them to ensure that the facts stated in the document concerned are true. A failure to do so can expose the signatory to criminal proceedings for contempt of court and if convicted, the sentence can include imprisonment, a fine and/or a seizure of assets. Not only that, but the credibility of the signatory as a witness will be destroyed and the Court is unlikely to accept as true other parts of his or her evidence. Witness statements and statements of case should therefore be read thoroughly before signature and amendments made to ensure that the document is factually correct.

 

now now sparkie no way on earth will those rats cope with you this time last time you had NOTHING not even a breakfast

yet ended up ALL DAY taking the **** out of those twits

BUT NO WAY COULD THEY LET YOU WIN AS I ALWAYS SAID HOW WOULD IT LOOK IN NEWS AT 10

 

MAN WALKS INTO COURT OF STREET AND WIPES OUT TOP LEGAL TEAM

AM 100% THIS TIME IT WILL BE ON MORE THAN NEWS AT 10

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

Ha Ha Pkelly I know something that you don't know and its nothing about Leprechauns.:D:D

[pkelly 177]

wouldnt be hard matie sure you can even trace where I am now

[pkelly 177]

rabbits working overtime matie

[pkelly 177]

pm me pleessssssssss

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

rabbits working overtime matie

 

 

NO Way..... me know a secret me not tell!!!:D

[pkelly 177]

FLY AWAY PETER LOL

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

FLY AWAY PETER LOL

 

 

Paul's still here though.

[pkelly 177]

Two little birds are standing in line at a bank when armed robbers burst in. While a few of the robbers take the money from the tellers, the others line the customers up against a wall and proceed to take their wallets, jewelry, and any other valuables they may have.

 

While this is all taking place, one wee birdy puts something into his colleague's hand. Without looking down, the second lawyers whispers, "What is that?"

 

"It's the £100 I owe you," replies the first wee birdy.

[pkelly 177]

that not a joke matie it true just like this I

 

Just got from a wee birdy about one of their wee birdy friends

 

A co workers husband speaks frantically into the phone, "My wife is pregnant, and her contractions are only two minutes apart!"

"Is this her first child?" the doctor queries.

"No, you idiot!" the wee birdy shouts. "This is her husband!"

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

Here you are Pkelly

Q: How do you stop a lawyer from drowning?

A: Shoot him before he hits the water.

[pkelly 177]

now now sparkie thats a waste of a bullet

[Sparkie1723 1,243]

Q: What's the difference between Brokers and terrorists?

A: You can negotiate with terrorists. "

 

 

[pkelly 177]

yes without interest lol

[pkelly 177]

andrew1 sorry but I dont want to be your friend until Sparkie accepts my request first. no ill feelings hope you dnt feel as hurt as I do

[andrew1 3,671]

andrew1 sorry but I dont want to be your friend until Sparkie accepts my request first. no ill feelings hope you dnt feel as hurt as I do

 

Shattered