Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @jk2054 retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free so I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out.   Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GE Capital send just 4 months statements


HONESTKNOB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After 1 year of saying that no statements are available, GE have today e mailed me a nearly complete set. I guess I have to assume these are accurate but how can they send me letters from their solicitors stating they dont have statements when they clearly do?

I'm amending my figures but am considering adding compensation now for witholding information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi I am in same position. I need last 6 years statements from DEbenhams store card to prove unfair charges to set judgement aside, there will be many charges on them but like you my debt was sold on to DCA and they say I would have been issued with staements monthly - can I ask you which letter did you send to Debenhams - a SAR or data protection request

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, pushbike.

 

Sending a SAR should get you everything they have on you.

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/subject_access_-_guide_for_data_subjects.pdf

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Any advice on what would be the best route of action now? I've got a court date and have till the end of this month to provide my court bundle. The original claim was using estimated figures but they've now produced a set of statements a year after I requested them and after saying this info wasn't available.

Will I only be able to claim for the charges on the statements they've provided? I really think GE should be liable for their actions somehow. Surely they can't just lie and say the statements aren't available then produce them when it suits them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HK,

 

I'm not aware of a basis where you can seek comp'n from them in the present court action, so you should focus on what you can claim.

 

Have you used the actual penalty charges figures, as shown on the statements, to fill in an accurate SOC (spready).

 

If so, what's the total chgs figure, and what's the interest on top.

 

What method and rate have you used to calculate interest.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The actual charges on the statements come to £273. I added contractual interest on up till the date the account was closed in Sept 2005 and Statutory from then till the present date. Gives me a total of just under £500.

The judge has given them till the end of December to provide a breakdown of their costs. What would happen if I didn't amend my estimated claim before then and GE defaulted by not providing the figures as we know they wont?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HK,

 

Save yourself the hassle of doing a court bundle and accept their offer of £500.

 

They won't provide a breakdown of their costs but they WILL tell the court you now have actual figures, so the judge may wonder why you haven't amended your claim.

 

Give them 7 days to pay up, and only discontinue your claim (in writing to the court) AFTER you have the money.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The offer of £500 expired a while ago, before they produced all the statements. I'm waiting for a response from them in the next few days which I guess will now be lower. I'll just have to sit on my hands for a few days I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed - I should have said to add on any court fees paid so far, on top of the £500,

 

Why not write, Without Prejudice, saying you would be willing to accept the offer made by them of £500 on Date, to avoid the unnecessary time and expense of taking the matter further in the present court proceedings.

 

Give them 7 days to confirm their acceptance or you will proceed with your claim and will seek the charges, Contractual Interest and court fees.

 

You'll also bring to the courts attention your attempt to resolve this out of court and their denial of the existance of the data which they eventually provided.

 

You could add that you'll be making formal complaints to the relevant bodies about the delays in providing the data to which you were entitled.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

hiya HN thanks for posting on my ge thread

 

i can see your battles, but your court action was for the getting the statements for your charges,

 

any result on this yet?

 

take care laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...