Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
    • I want to add my 2 cents here...  The purchase of this debt, Perch Group dont absolve themselves of liabilities from the Original Creditor. They should be responsible for dealing with this complaint in response to an Irresponsible Lending dispute.  If the balance is disputed as such in that way - Then they should be referring to the Original Creditor where applicable.    Also if your complaint was written in a way where a template wasnt used or it was rewritten to a similar effect where it wasnt recognisable - Then you probably would have stood a better opportunity at it not getting rebuffed.  To be honest those - Perch and TM Legal are a waste of Oxygen and will say anything to get you to pay.    Ditto on the template. Where did you find it?  Please keep in mind we have to unravel what you have done till now and help build a formal response.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The proof that "Metroplitan Credit Services" are just another part of HSBC


netg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5694 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just started a run-in with this crowd, all due to a screw-up by HSBC (well, I've yet to get that proven, but I'm pretty sure.)

 

One thing you ought to know is "MCS" are NOT really a separate company to HSBC. Although they will not tell you, they are a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC bank - you can get that information from Companies House - I downloaded a copy of the Annual Return dated 14/6/2007 and it's there in black and white: MCS has only issued 2 shares, and those 2 shares are owned by "HSBC Asset Finance (UK) Ltd", 8 Canada Square, London. So technically MCS are a separate legal entity to HSBC, in practise HSBC have 100% control of MCS's activities.

 

Further proof:

 

I received a call on my mobile from "MCS" today - at the time I hadn't realised that "MCS" was "Metropolitan", so I refused to speak to them when they asked me to confirm my date of birth etc., as I said I didn't know who they were. Later, when I realised, I tried to call them back on the same number they had called me from - +44 800 7838 422 and amusingly got a recorded message which said "You were called by HSBC bank. No further action is required by you and there is no need to return the call." (Could anybody here make a recording of it? its a free-phone number).

 

So, apart from being slightly amusing (they've screwed up they're "we're a separate company" pretence) this makes it very obvious that they're hooked directly into HSBC's telephone system, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if they're also directly hooked into HSBC's computer system too (hmmm... would that be illegal, data protection issues?)

 

So why all this pretence?

 

* I'd imagine the main reason is they're trying to put the wind up you, trying to make you think you've been "referred" to a "Collections Agency" with they think will make you uncomfortable or even scared. They use a similar FUD technique with you on the phone (FUD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt)

 

* Other possible reason's that, given the way they behave (seems like their agents are all ex-Gestapo) they might not want such behaviour to be associated with a nice "caring" bank like HSBC, even if it were in the interests of credit-control.

 

* Finally, they may have internal accounting reasons ("cooking the books") by passing debt to a separate company they as HSBC can write it off as a bad debt, and probably obtain tax-benefits in the shorter term, without actually losing control as the separate company is owned by them anyway.

 

Not sure about he last point - anybody here got any opinions?

 

For my part I'm totally disillusioned with HSBC as a result of all this. Apart from the cock-up they made in the first place that resulted in my "debt" the fact that they're now trying to deceive me about the identity of "MCS". I'll be moving my banking and credits card accounts elsewhere once I get this mess sorted.

 

Nonetheless, I'm going to enjoy my next telephone conversation with them, as I'm going to be the one asking the questions: "Could you explain how you managed to call me from an HSBC telephone number?" etc. :)

 

My recommendation when you speak to them - don't let them FUD you! Ask them lots of questions. For example if they say something like "blah..blah.... may result in legal action..." reply: "Ok, what date will you be starting the legal action? I'll let my solicitor know." They're probably won't be able to answer the "what date?" question.

Edited by netg
Minor, fix two typos and wikipedia link
Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been obvious for a long time Metro are a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC, they occupy the same office building as DG Solicitors (another wholly owned subsidiary) and they even all have the same data controller (so they have no problems from the Data Protection Act passing data between the companies) I also personally believe they all share the same computer network, the same one your local branch has.

 

Neat little set up Bank, Solicitor and DCA all effectively the same company, however, in practice it does seem to hinder them rather than help, they get things wrong more often than right.

 

I suppose if your any good at being a solicitor or a DCA you work for a proper company rather than some corporate facade where you are told what you can and cant do :rolleyes:.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'd gathered that the info was already general knowledge (here at least) but I just wanted the proof, so that I can ask them why they're trying to mislead me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as DCA's go, getting Metro on your case is a bit like being savaged by a wet haddock :rolleyes:.

 

HSBC do sell (assign) debts to proper DCA's when they get no joy from their own people which can be a bit more serious but nothing we cant handle here :).

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as DCA's go, getting Metro on your case is a bit like being savaged by a wet haddock :rolleyes:. ...

pete

 

Thanks for the info Pete. I'm not too worried. Their main threat seems to revolve around my credit rating. They don't seemed to have twigged the fact that I've been living outside of the UK for the past 10 years, so my UK credit rating is hardly my primary concern. I'm waiting for them to slip up and threaten that somebody will be calling at my door :)

 

I also have the satisfaction of knowing they're paying international mobile rates when they call me. Maybe I'll take out a premium rate number and give them that as my contact number :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose if your any good at being a solicitor or a DCA you work for a proper company rather than some corporate facade where you are told what you can and cant do :rolleyes:.

pete

 

 

MCS's "nominal value of issued shares" as recorded by Companies House is 2.00 pounds. So not really enough to pay for a complete cowboy outfit, but maybe just the trousers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange thing - pete and netg - I found contact details for MCS on the net today for 'raz' and they are as follows:

 

Freephone: 0500 99 22 99

International: 00 44 121 455 2375

Registered Address:

56 St. James Road

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 1JL

Registration Number: 1475006

If the freephone number doesn't work - I think the number (judging from the international one ) would be : 0121-455-2375 -it is -I've just tried it!LOL!

I rang it and got an answering message which said they were MCS ...... didn't try the freephone one though....:)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The full truth turns out to be even more convoluted! I've posted my findings today as a separate thread here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/151559-truth-about-mcs-metropolitan.html#post1608084

 

I had great fun, to be honest they didn't squirm as much as I'd hoped, but there was definitely some squirming going on :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

 

I have just joined these forums and I am ready to send these capitalism suckers right to Hell.

 

To cut a long story short, I became long term ill in 2007 in 2008 and through it became also unemployed - surprise surprise! Employers' duty of care?... not really!... - Anyway...

 

I had a HSBC Current Account and small FlexiLoan and a HSBC Credit Card. The two credit lines, both covered by sickness/unemployment policies.

 

For a start, an awsome number of excessive charges on my current account never got any attention from HSBC and to-date I am still waiting for the complete account history to be sent to me.

 

Then the Credit Card was actually paid in full by the Insurance Policy and - please NOTE - I expected the same to happen with the FlexiLoan, because that is what I was told.

 

No so! Insurance Policy for FlexiLoans pays for 12 months only, the monthly payment, not the balance. This is not what I was told at the counter!

 

And finally, whilst the Insurance Policy (Norwich Union) is dealing with my claim under the provisions of the Policy Unemployment, GUESS what HSBC did?!?!... They passed the matter to METROPOLITAN anc closed the accounts.

 

METROPOLITAN calls me today - Sunday, at 11AM!!! - asking for full payment of the FlexiLoan.

 

And although told over the phone that the FlexiLoan was being dealt with under Insurance, the harrassment went on and on, demanding payment.

 

So, if METROPOLITAN really is HSBC, I am stunned that they do not have details of the Insurance claim currently being processed, since they seem to have EVERY other detail about me, including name, address and date of birth!

 

So, I have lost my patience with these people and swear by God that tomorrow will be SHOUTING day at the branch, straight in public and in front of everyone, because I actually feel that I have had enough of these tossers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Cap and welcome to the HSBC forum :).

 

Your attitude is perfectly understandable and I don't think you will find anyone here who would disagree with you :) but one thing to bear in mind when you go into you branch is the counter staff are probably as much in the dark about what HSBC really get up to as anyone else :rolleyes: and are probably fed corporate "we are right and the customers who complain are just trouble makers" bull**** at regular intervals.

 

If you can try to see the branch manager, (I doubt he will agree to see you but you can try) and try to sort it out with them. When you get home write and confirm everything you spoke about and any agreements you made.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also a good idea to take a littlle notebook with you and make notes in it during the conversation - scares the hell out of them .......:cool: -

and say things like "now , just to be sure I've got this right - you are saying....."

It concentrates their mind if they think they're going to be quoted....:rolleyes:

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks. I will take a notepad, but I think I need to wait for a letter from this Metropolitan. Then, armed with that and the correspondence from the Insurance, I will challenge HSBC.

 

The most annoying consequence of all this is that I no longer trust any company, bank, institution of any kind, as I become increasingly aware of the globalist shift and its consequences for most people.

 

Just can't help myself to getting ever more resistant against the whole globalism trend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most annoying consequence of all this is that I no longer trust any company, bank, institution of any kind, as I become increasingly aware of the globalist shift and its consequences for most people.

 

That's the worst part of it, CS - a few banks and businesses have decided there is no such thing as loyalty to customers, only screwing them for as much as they can. :mad:This ,in turn, has made us distrustful of every bank and business . These bloodsuckers have a lot to answer for - let's hope they get called to account soon.........

Meanwhile, keep us up to speed with how yours goes please, the experience of others is always valuable........:-)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi All

I am in a IVA with a few creditors and MET Coll is one. "what a pain in the arse they are". Met Coll call centre is in the Philippines. Every time i get a call from them they claim not to have heard from Payplan the company i selected to deal with. Even when i have emails from payplan confirming they have passed the information onto them. i.e. Birmingham fax no. 0121455 2997 given to me by the call centre. Now i have a UK phone number i might get to the bottom of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now i have a UK phone number i might get to the bottom of it.

 

Hi paul - don't bet on it - they have a 0500 No. that patches straight through to the MCS Phillipines .............:rolleyes:

But keep at 'em anyway - ......LOL !

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...