Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Reclaim Overdraft Charges from RBS - Scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did they contact you directly to organise the money back or do they have to notify the court first? also how long did it take for them to call?

 

Haven't received my papers yet from the court, how long does this normally take?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, Jim.

 

Usually takes about two weeks for the court to send your papers back, they will give you a Return Date and a Calling Date. The Calling Date is about a week after the Return Date.

 

When you receive your papers (Summons), you will have to take them to a Sheriff Officers to get them to serve them on RBS.

You will then receive a 'Form of Certificate of Execution of Service' from the Sheriff Officers, letting you know they have served the Summons.

 

Your Return Date and Calling Date will be a few months after you receive your papers from the Court, mines were exactly two months.

 

The day after the Return Date, you must contact the Court to see if there has been any response by the Bank.

 

If the Defender denies the claim, the case will call and you must appear or be represented in Court on the Calling Date.

 

If there has been no response from the Defender, you must lodge a minute with the court no later than 4pm on the Friday before the Calling Date.

You will not have to appear in court.

 

If you fail to do so the case will be dismissed.

 

Let me know when you receive your papers and I'll try to keep you informed of what to do next.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Scott

 

I have receive the papers for the summon, have a date arranged in January.

I have received a letter form BOS regarding the court action saying basically that they will be applying for a sist until pending OFT has been resolved.

Presumably thay will have informed the court also of this? and that I don't need to contact the court regarding this?

 

So can someone confirm that I do not have to do anything until the day after my return date, when I need to contact the court?

 

Thanks

Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. You are Correct. You do not need to do anything until the day after the return date.

 

If BOS has applied for a sist, the court will inform you of this and whether they have accepted the sist or not and what action to take next.

 

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

I have received a letter from the sheriff's office and i'm not sure what to make of it. Here's what it said.....

 

'You are hereby served with a copy of the attached Incidental Application, and Deliverance and appoints parties to be heard on the application on 17th December 2008 at 2pm within court 1........that's on the first page

 

2nd page reads......

The Court, Grants Warrant to the defender to serve a copy of the foregoing Incidental application and of this deliverance on the persuer their agents by FIRST CLASS RECORDED DELIVERY POST / any legal mode upon a period of notice of 48 hours and appoints parties to be heard on the Application on 17th December at 2pm

 

3rd page reads.......

Small claim summons incidental application

 

name...Pursuer against HBOS Plc Defenders

 

GORDON for the defenders respectfully craves the court to sist the action pending determination of the action raised in the high court in London by the OFT against Abbey National Plc (and others) as a test case in relation to the legal issues which arise in the action..signed by the defenders solicitors

 

ANY HELP???

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an incidental application for a sist (a stay in English law). Basically what they are asking for is that the case should be sisted until the outcome of the English test case.

 

The pursuers and the defenders arguments as to why a sist should be granted or not will be heard on 17th December 2008 at 2pm within court 1. This will be an oral argument.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to go there? as my prelim hearing date is on 22nd Jan

 

Procedure is not something I am totally clued up on but I do believe that you will have to attend on the 17th December.

 

This is where you can put your argument to the Sheriff on why the case should not be sisted. If you do not attend, then the Sheriff may grant the defender the sist until the outcome of the Test Case.

 

There is help on the Govan Community Law Centre, Glasgow, Scotland | Free legal resources website. They have case law on why cases in Scotland should not be sisted.

 

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what I would need to do or say especially up against the might of the Solicitors for HBoS!! Has a look at the link above but it's quite confusing, So don't think it would be worthy of me attending.

 

I think that the judge may have had lots of similar situation like this so he probably knows what will happen before it actually does!

 

Any more advice?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is up to you if you attend or not. If you attend and the Banks' Solicitors dont attend, then you can ask the Sheriff to Setlle the Claim there and then since the banks' Solicitors did not turn up, they are obviously wasting the courts time.

 

I do know however, that if the Banks' Solcitors turn up and you don't, the Sheriff most certainly will Sist the case.

 

The Scottish Legal System is different to the English System. In England, some cases are being sisted automatically, but in Scotland, the law gives you the right to pursue your action. If you give the Sheriff the reason that "it infringes your Human Rights as there is no end in sight to the Test Case in England and Wales (a Foreign Court, I may add), which could go on for years to come with appeals to the House of Lords and the European Courts of Justice. You have the right to have your case heard within a certain time period without protracted delays."

 

Good Luck with what you decide. Remember there is a buddy system on here. You can search to find someone living close to you who will go to court with you to help you out.

 

The Sheriff will be there to help you. He will ask you some questions and ask you what you want to do next. It is usually held in private (in the Sheriff's Chambers).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best way would be to create a thread and ask people what they think of the buddy system. Read theri opinions and then decide.

 

If you decide to use the buddy system, just click on the link at the top of the page and search for a buddy in your post code.

 

Good Luck Again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were you I would attend. While the sheriff will have already formed an opinion of which way he is going to go, it's basically a dead cert that if you don't attend the sist will be granted as it's highly likely that the other side will attend.

 

On the day it would be best to have a copy of the points that you wish to make so that you can refer to them if/when the need arises. We can give you a hand with this.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have just received another 3 letters in the post?

 

1) Letter from the sheriff court saying that the hearing date had changed, apparantly it was on 12th Dec but failed to let either party know. It also mentioned that neither side attended and that the normal hearing date of 22nd Jan would still stand.

 

2) Letter from Dundas and Wilson (HBoS representatives) - Acknowledging the new date and that neither party showed up (they were actually quite nice in the letter)

 

3) The same letter I originally received from the sheriff court with date of hearing etc.

 

I take that I should just wait until the time comes to call up the sheriff court to see what HBoS want to do?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...