Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5795 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. My lodger has received a Notice of Issue of Warrant of Execution (longstanding CCJ for a civil debt that he was paying by instalments but could no longer afford). The Court knows he can't afford the instalments, has no possessions, and has no job to do an attachment of earnings, but still issued the Warrant. Nothing in or on the property belongs to my lodger, everything is mine. I certainly won't let the Bailiff into the property but I can't keep him out of the garden, 1. because there's no gate, 2. because another lodger uses the back garden to get into his flat at the back of the property. If the Bailiff comes, can he/she take stuff out of my garden without taking any steps to find out who it actually belongs to? If they come when I'm here, how do I prove that everything is mine? The debt and Warrant have absolutely nothing to do with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I can pretty much guarantee they wont be taking anything out of your garden, i certainly would not anyway and theres not a bailiff in my company who would neither, chill out and stop worrying its not your problem!!"

 

Thanks for response, Kermit, but there is stuff in my garden which would definitely be worth lifting. Why do you think a bailiff wouldn't take it? And if he turns up while I'm out, he won't know that the stuff belongs to me and not to the debtor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I can pretty much guarantee they wont be taking anything out of your garden, i certainly would not anyway and theres not a bailiff in my company who would neither, chill out and stop worrying its not your problem!!"

 

Thanks for response, Kermit, but there is stuff in my garden which would definitely be worth lifting. Why do you think a bailiff wouldn't take it? And if he turns up while I'm out, he won't know that the stuff belongs to me and not to the debtor.

 

To be perfectly honest most garden stuff would usually be rather much larger than the vans we use, i also know from experience that most bailiffs will not remove household especially garden furniture, also Bailifffs cant just remove stuff willy nilly, they at least have to have reasonable belief that the items belong to the charge payer, debtor. Like i say i think you can rest easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to inform police and get a reference number. If anything is nicked from your garden then you have a suspect and a motive.

 

The general advice is serving the bailiff an affidavit - a statement sworn before a Commissioner of Oaths (£5-10 fee applies). Make four copies, send one to the bailiff by post, one to the local police, one for your own records and one to hand to the bailiff through a window if he turns up.

 

Never use recorded delivery when serving documents by post - it gives the bailiff an opportunity to decline receipt. PO Box addresses are fine.

 

 

 

 

DECLARATION OF OWNERSHIP

 

 

 

I [NAME] of [ADDRESS AND POSTCODE] make this statement knowing that it may be presented to a Court and believing the contents to be true.

 

1. I am the legal tenant of the above-mentioned property and own all its contents and I declare there is no entitlement enabling anyone to change ownership, possession, location, use and enjoyment of my property or deprive me of it for the purposes of using it as leverage for obtaining a money transfer from somebody else.

 

2. I further declare that any bailiff or person seeking a money transfer from somebody else including members of my household may not consider my property and chattels to be prima facie to be the property of, or belonging to somebody else.

 

3. I believe that the facts given in this statement are true.

 

4. This statement will be served on a firm of bailiffs known as [NAME] of [ADDRESS] by ordinary course of post and will be considered good service under Section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978.

 

 

[NAME] _______________________

 

Date__________________________

 

Sworn before me:

 

______________________________

An officer of the Court.

 

 

Cover letter serving affidavit on the bailiff:

 

Name of Bailiffs

Address 1

Address 2

Address 3

Address 4

 

[DATE]

 

BY POST AND BY HAND

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: [YOUR NAME]: Notice of ownership of property

 

Please find the enclosed affidavit for your information.

 

I understand you or your firm of bailiffs has seized, or is intending to seize my [CHATTELS/VEHICLE] or other property belonging to me at the above-mentioned address as collateral for an apparent debt belonging to somebody else.

 

Please be advised that any attempt to subvert this notice will automatically result in a Form 4 being filed at the bailiffs certificating court without contacting you further. Both you as a firm and your bailiff may be criminally liable for offences under Section 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006 and any criminal aspect of this matter will be passed to the police.

 

This document is delivered by Royal Mail and served on you by the ordinary course of post under Section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978 and it is now your responsibility and in your own interests this document is handed to the relevant person within your organisation. I regret I am unable to discuss this matter by telephone or in person.

 

Yours very truly

 

[YOUR NAME]

cc [NAME OF FORCE] Police

 

 

And send a copy to your local police authority.

 

Name of Police Authority

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Address 1

Address 2

Address 3

Address 4

 

[DATE]

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Bailiffs and Sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006

 

I enclose a copy of an affidavit I have sent to a firm of bailiffs known as [NAME OF BAILIFFS] of [ADDRESS OF BAILIFFS] by even post who threaten to obtain my goods as a lien for somebody else's debt. I understand this commits a criminal offence under Sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.

 

For the purpose of crime prevention, please assign a reference number to enable CAD to be aware of the circumstances should an emergency arise and proper investigation of criminal activity.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

[YOUR NAME]

Enc: copy of affidavit.

 

 

 

If you need to file an official complaint against the bailiff, complete a Form 4 and attach a copy of the above affidavit and send to the bailiffs certificating court. Ask for your costs and affidavit fee.

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/form4_0606.pdf

First to fly the Airbus A380

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for response, Kermit. I appreciate what you say about furniture being too big, but these items aren't furniture and they're reasonably small, though heavy. Anyway, I'm reassured that they would make sure who any property belongs to before taking it.

 

Woww, thanks you your response too. I don't know who the Bailiff will be from. My lodger showed me the Warrant of Execution; it refers to the bailiffs office and I get the impression from it that the bailiffs are based in the Courthouse. Maybe they work for the Court. What I can't understand is why the Court are sending bailiffs when my lodger submitted his finances form and the Court have acknowledged that he has no money or belongings, only loads of debt. Doesn't make a bit of sense to me. I expect a bailiff fee will also be added to what he already owes. Crackers, isn't it? What is the point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debtor has no assets to the value of the debt then the case is returned to the creditor Nulla Bona. It'll probably come to nothing.

First to fly the Airbus A380

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your lodger has a County Court Judgment (CCJ) and this debt is being enforced by a County Court bailiff. This is VERY different from the typ of bailiffs enforcing unpaid parking tickets and council tax.

 

 

You have very little to worry about as they are most reasonable. The court have a duty to provide a Warrant of Execution if the creditorhas requested it.

 

I would suggest that he calls the County Court and asks for the bailiff office....normally before 9am and discusses the matter with him. He is representing the creditor so he will need to provide some sort of report back to them to confirm that the debt is not able to be collected.

 

A bailiff from the County Court is the ONLY one that you can safely allow into your home. In addition, he will not be charging any fees.

 

Try not to worry......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that clarification, Tomtubby. I'll tell him to contact the Court then. Maybe that'll be the end of all this. I hope so for his sake, as he's had a nightmare of a time over the last 10 years or so and this mess was all the result of some really bad luck - redundancies one after the other - you know the theme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Kermit. My mind's at rest now re my own possessions. But I really sympathise with my lodger who I've known for years. He became my lodger after his house was repossessed and I know he's genuinely horrified at his situation and powerless to do anything. I also know that the Courts can be totally useless, District Judges all too cosy with Claimants and their barristers. I better stop ranting now before I get myself wound up. Thanks to all for your responses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...