Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I made that payment on 13th Feb, then it all went down hill. 
    • Massive potentially that payment has been made in some form as accompanying evidence to your financial difficulties.  And yes, but add some more zing to the email if it goes to the CEO - You need to make them understand what they have done. And telling the CEO  / MD of the biz what their actions have done to you - It adds to the complaint weighting.    
    • I have just found an email (and checked and verified it on my MCB account online) and I did make a payment to them, but then obvs didn't after that. Will that make any difference to my case? 
    • This is what I have said in my email of complaint:   On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I have found myself in financial difficulty and I contacted you on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months and I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name.  I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this.  What I would like you to do is to please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP. If you fail to resolve my complaint within 8 weeks, or if matters are not settled to my satisfaction, I will have no alternative but to refer my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully, Should I send something along those lines to the CEO? 
    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lloyds are taking US to court-counterclaim help needed -please!!


jubaxt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5766 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks.

Back in 2007, before the oft case,we had sent prelim and lba to Loyds for charges on our current account(joint names) for approx £5000ish.

We received £750 as a goodwill payment and nothing else.We could not afford to pay the court fee so our claim was never filed(are we stupid or what?)

The account was left with a £2500 overdraft and has not been used in a year or so.

 

hubby also had a loan which defaulted and this morning he has received a court claim for that account for £4874 + costs which takes it to £5039.40.

 

he is away at the mo so I will be left to sort out the counterclaim-please help me someone:cool:

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish they would take me to court. My claim is on stay.

 

I think If you defend your claim like evryone else is they will ask for a stay.

 

It would be interesting to see what they have included in there particulars. BY any chance are they saying you are breaking your contract?

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the £750 offered and accepted purely as a "goodwill gesture / gesture of goodwill etc" (GOGW).

ie.

Did they state on the offer it was a goodwill gesture and without prejudice?

Did you sign anything before accepting it?

Hopefully this did not stipulate anything about it being a full and final settlement with regards the claim, or indicate that by accepting it you waived any rights to continue with the claim etc.

You must check on this.

 

If it was purely a GOGW, then you should now just proceed with the claim through the courts.

There will be no need to deduct the £750 from the total, as this was given to you purely as a goodwill gesture (ie; it was just a gift... or some may say a bribe), and so has no bearing upon the total of the claim.

 

Secondly, was the loan a consolidation loan?

ie. was it taken out to clear borrowing upon the current account that is the subject of your claim?

Or was it taken out to buy or pay off something else (Car, Home extension, some debts or borrowing elsewhere etc)?

 

If it was a consolidation loan, then you may be able to reply to their defence along the lines of; The loan was taken out to repay sums allegedly owed by the defendant (you) to the claimant (The bank) upon another account. These sums are in dispute because they had in actual fact largely accrued due to the claimants own previous acts of regularly taking sums from the account unlawfully. So the alleged debt is currently under dispute, and now relates to actions being taken upon the other account. (Look around for the best wording)

 

If was taken for some other purpose, it may be trickier.

 

I've not had to actually do this myself, so can't help with exact wording, but there are lots of similar cases and suggestions on site. I'm sure someone will be along to help you with the wording or point you in the right direction.

 

In any case, you should go to the step by step pages, and the templates library and now prepare your POC's for your claim upon the main account.

 

You really should then file this at court ASAP.

 

You should read up on the court costs, as you might even find that you could qualify for waived fees or a reduction.

 

If not, and you do have to pay, then it really would be money well spent (and it will be reclaimable from the defendant anyway).

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi folks-things gone from bad to worse-we had a bit of a problem after receiving the summons and, due to time constraints, decided to ask for extra time to pay the amount-(with the intention of then continuing with the charges claim afterwards).

 

A letter was sent to s,c &m with our payment proposal.

 

HOWEVER-today they have responded by saying that their client(Lloyds) still intend to seek judgement-Is it too late to prevent a judgement being entered?

 

many thanks

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why put your own claim in?

 

Cant you just inform the court you wish to counterclaim?

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope-too late-:(

 

I sent the application for more time to pay to s,c &m.They have applied for judgement but we received the summons mid june so...........too late now to counter-claim:mad:

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen this thread ?

 

Don't know if this route could be of use ?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/125636-36-offers-implications-tactics.html

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they actually have judgment?. . If they do not, and you need to be quick, is fill in form N244 and apply for a set aside.

 

The court may agree to set aside the Default judgment if you did not send in a reply form within the time limits if it thinks you have real chance of a successful defence to the claim, and the court thinks you have a "good reason" to set aside the judgment e.g. where you did not get the papers through the post.

 

Also ask the court to stop any enforcement of the judgment until after the hearing to set the judgment aside.

 

There will be a hearing in your local County Court in private with a District Judge. The court will take into account how quickly you made the application and may want to know the reason for any delay e.g. you only just found out about the judgment, or due to the test case on hold, you thought this would be on hold as well.

 

Get the form in quick stating that the claim should be set aside as your counterclaim is bank charges related and all claims are on hold pending the test case out come. Maybe worth a call to the court manager for some more advice on this, they are there to assist too.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...