Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Had reply to grievance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got a reply to my grievance but was not satisfied with my employers replies as I am still in the same position as before I put in the grievance. Employer has not addresses any of my issues and will not accommodate with my disability. After numbers of phone calls and emails to my union rep and about how I should reply to the outcome of the grievance and got no response I therefore had to reply to my employer myself but without any advice from my union rep.

 

After I had put in the response as if I did not it would have been out of time. I again tried to get my union rep for advice on DDA, I finally got a phone call stating that I should start all over again with another grievance. Now my employer is clearly in breach of the DDA and when I posed this question to my union rep he said he would look it up but he was not sure and said that my disability would not come under the act, I had to force him to get that response from him. I feel that he is not taking my case seriously and he seems vague on the phone to me about my case although he said that he has read everything he vaguely made reference to some of the the major items in what I sent him but from speaking to him briefly on the phone I feel that it is a wast of time with him

 

He said to ring him when he will be in his office again next week. I feel that I am struggling with him and with my employer. :confused:

Edited by Allwood
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember should I not wait until I hear back from my employer before I start another grievance, can someone please let me know if this the correct procedure.:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

What response do you expect from the employer and what could you include in a new grievance which hasn't been said already?

 

Your response should have been exercising the right to appeal and this should be handled by a more senior (or different) manager. Just be aware that if you end up taking this to a Tribunal you may end up out of time, so by all means see what the reponse will be but be mindful that the clock is ticking!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Siderwinder - I did appeal and that was my response to my employers investigations to my grievance. I do not know what the union rep is playing at. We he came with me for the hearing he know the HR manager very well which was very disconcerting. I asked question in my response to my employers investigations to the best of my ability as there were many inconsistencies in the their findings. I think I may have to go to a professional to get a overview of what to do next as clearly my union rep is not at all interesting in my case although their literature says that new members of their union would be able to get legal opinion the moment they join the union. clearly this is not true becasue I have asked my rep for a legal opinion and fell on deft ears.

 

What is the length of time do I have left before I can take it to a tribunal.:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The limits are normally three months after the incident causing the grievance or from the date of leaving the employer. If you raise a grievance within three months, then the Tribual may consider an extension to a maximum of six months.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I am out of time the incident that happened at work took place 6 months ago, but I am still unable to sit down and I have asked my area union if my employer is in breach of DDA because they will not make minor adjustment in relation to my injury. I was told that he would look it up for me and that he thinks that osteoporosis will be be covered as a long term illness in the act. :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have put in grievances and got a reply to say that the OHA said that I should be treated as any other employee when sick however when i was taking to the OHA he said that he would be writing to my employer that my duty should be varied able to sit as and when necessary. However my employer dined this in reply to my grievances and said that I should be treated as any other employee although they would let me have a copy of the OHA letter. I told the OHA that I had osteoporosis therefore my employer should be able to accommodate me. My union is absolutely useless.

 

I would be far better off just have an employee with and would cost me nothing instead of paying them a month subscription for what??:x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allwood - you should make sure you get a copy of the OHA report - forget the Union, they will make it longer and more long winded - just do your own homework and get independent advice as you are doing here. If you are not happy with the outcomes - appeal, and keep on appealing til you get some action. The DDA will cover discrimination in different ways see this link: Landmark judgments for disabled workers | OUT-LAW.COM

We are the only ones who make life difficult......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cellbar for the link it is very interesting, I have asked in my replies to HR investigation why they refused to let me have OHA letter as well as other issues raised such as why are giving a chair to sit down to pregnant people and not me with my injury but I still have not got a reply to that as yet I think I will have to wait for their reply before I do anything else. All my union rep said that I should put in another grievance and they know I am still waiting for a reply to the appeal I made, these people either do not know what they are talking about or they are in cohorts with the employers. :-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Had a meeting with my line manager yesterday and was told firstly that I would have to go for a capability meeting as I needed to be able to sit during my working hours, after the meeting ended and went to my my workstation, I was called again for another meeting and was told that according to their OHA's report my condition was not related to an underlying ill health problem and they would needed to see me again on Monday for another meeting to see if I should have a disciplinary hearing due to my accident which they said was 'sickness' absences from work.

 

After many requests I got sight of the OHA.s report, the actually report which said that my case was reviewed (by way of a telephone conversation at my home). The OHA report said that in her opinion there is no underlying ill health problem as defined in the Company's Managing Sick Absence policy paragraph 4.1. and my employer should manager my case under paragraph 4.2 of the company's policy. My accident was a torn knee cartilage and when I went back to work I was not able to sit at all and knocked my knee again and was off as result of the damage I had done to it.

 

Also the OHA report said that my duties should be varied and I should be allowed to sit and stand during my work hrs. also, during my review on the telephone with the OHA I advised her that I had osteoporoses when asked me if I was taking any other medication.

 

The manager that interview me is leaving the company in two weeks time and I am not sure if he is leaving is due to my grievance or not. Also the manger said that I would be advised on my next day at work after he got some clarification on whether my condition should be classed under the DDA as my injury was a cartilage and not bone related.

 

The report said that a further 2-3 months before I would be fully recovered. However I was forced back to work by HR 5 weeks after that the review by the OHA and was not give anywhere to sit down.

 

Dose anyone know if I should insist on seeing the OHA again as she is medical qualified as oppose to seeing my managers again for them to review me, I do not trust my mangers whatsoever as they have before now completely back track on what they say and are not honest. :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them for a copy of there policy (each companies is different). Also try giving the Equalities and Human Rights Commission a call they are the experts on Disability Related Issues and should be able to give you more information.

9/8 - Discovered Consumer Action Group Site:D

 

RBOS - Personal Account

10/8 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to RBOS

17/5 - Defence lodged by RBS

24/5 - Court date

21/5 - Offer received:rolleyes:

22/5 - Offer rejected

25/5 - New offer received and accepted!!!!!!

 

MBNA Credit Card

10/8 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to MBNA

Feb 07 Received payment in full...Yeh!!!!:-D

 

RBOS Business Account

25/5 - May 07 - Statements received

23/7 - Offered received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the union advised of your situation but do not rely on them

You are not out-of-time to bring a complaint to an ET for disability discrimination as a result of your employer failing to make reasonable adjustments. Since failing to make reasonable adjustments is a continuous act you can make an application to an ET at anytime after 28 days have past from raising a grievance with your employer.

Be aware and careful, in order to prove you have a disability for the purposes of the DDA you need to prove the following.

 

1. The condition is permanent - that means it has lasted more than a year or is likely to last more than a year

2. The condition has a substantial effect on your day to day activities - that means it has more than a minor or trivial effect on your day to day activities

 

Although you have not stated it I suspect you have sciatica and/or back pain as you have problems sitting …but I’m not sure from what you have said. In addition I suspect you have knee pain and feel unstable on your feet. I suspect these symptoms would affect your mobility (walking, traveling in a car, etc...), your concentration (pain distracting you from tasks whilst sitting at a computer, talking to friends), your physical co-ordination (reaching for objects on the floor or a shelf), your ability to lift, carry or otherwise move everyday objects ( e.g. move a chair, carry shopping)

How long have you had a condition which affects you day to day activities?

I suggest you do the following.

Write to your employer and their occupational health adviser and spell it out to them how your condition effects your day to day activities, e.g. walking, sitting, traveling in a car, sitting at a desk at home, using the computer at home, cleaning up the house, car , or garden, socializing. Even if you can do these tasks it is relevant how you do them i.e. painfully or more slowly. Explain about any medication you are taking to mitigate your symptoms and allow you to perform tasks. Explain any tasks you now avoid because of your condition. Explain if it takes you longer to get going in the morning due to joint stiffness (say). Explain if your sleep is being disturbed. Explain if you do not socialize as much because of your condition. If the condition is effecting your mental health e.g. anxiety or depression, although you may find it difficult, you should not hesitate to advise your employer.

I also suggest in the same letter you propose what adjustment you think would help you, adjustments which would put you at no disadvantage to your non disabled colleagues.

The two most common defenses used by the employers are “the employee doesn’t have a disability” and/or “we didn’t know the employee had a disability”. A letter along the above lines will seriously erode these defenses.

Do not be too concerned about their opinion about your disability or otherwise. It is not a decision for the employer or their occupational health adviser as to whether you suffer a disability or not. It is a judicial decision i.e. employment tribunal or civil court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...