Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Finlander V Firstplus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3880 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok this is the reply I'm going to send to FP...

 

 

ATTN; Russell Green

 

Customer Care Team

 

FIRSTPLUS Financial Group Plc

The Avenue Business Park

Pentwyn

 

Cardiff

CF23 8FF

10th June 2008

Ref ; XXXXXX

Account Number ; XXXXXX

Dear Mr Green,

Thank you for your letter of the 4th June 2008 .I am replying in email but shall also be sending this letter in hard copy. You may reply if you wish by email or letter.

I have considered your response and reject your offer in its entirety even as part settlement to this complaint.

I had delayed any further action in response to Mr Mullins letter of the 28th May 2008 until I received your final response. Now that I have received this I shall of course be referring the matter to my solicitor and the FOS.

I would like to thank your for your easily rejected derisory offer which will probably allow me to expose your companies practices in a court of law.

Yours truly,

FINLANDER

Short and sweet :-)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.At no time was I told that PPI could be purchased elsewhere to cover the loan

 

 

2. It was not made clear that the insurance was only valid for the first five years of the loan - in fact the first time this became apparent was on receipt of the information requested about the account under the Data Protection Act.

 

3. I was led to believe that Payment Protection Insurance was compulsory and indeed was misled into thinking that I would stand more chance of getting the loan if I took the Payment Protection Insurance

 

4. It was not explained to me that there were certain exclusions within the policy that could affect me.

 

5. The Payment Protection Insurance was added to the loan balance at the outset and at no time was it explained that there were PPI policies where one could pay monthly for substantially lower premiums and which would cover my clients for the whole term of the loan.

 

6. The terms & conditions of the insurance were not fully explained

 

7. At the time of taking out the insurance I already had in force, and had for a number of years, a insurance policy from my work to cover me against, accident, illness or death. The agent selling the insurance made no enquiries into this. The agent also made on enquiries into previous medical conditions, which might render the policy, invalid. I have suffered with an injury to my back sustained at work and documented by my doctor.

 

8. The agent told me that the insurance policy was in fact a very good way of saving, as half the premium would be refunded in five years. He did not explain that this was the term of the insurance. He did not explain that the entire premium was added to the loan and that no refund would be available if settled early. They also misrepresented the ‘saving’ potential as they would pay no interest on the premium but I would have to pay interest to them. This was outrageous miss-representation as this could no way be described as ‘a good way of saving’

 

9. As a serving XXXXXX it is not possible for me to be made redundant by law. I do not believe that the insurance sold had any relevance to my situation.

 

10. First plus have failed to provide me with copies of the audiotapes of conversations between their representatives and me. However they have stated in their response that they were not regulated by the FSA at this time and therefore had no need to ask or enquire if the policy was right for my needs or I was disqualified from cover by a previous medical condition. It does however seem that first plus where governed by the CGIS code which does require them to make these enquiries.

11. Despite assuring me that they had listened to the tapes of my conversations with their representatives and that if I required them that I would be provided with a copy by return of post, they have now stated it will take a further 40 days to comply with my request. I believe this is a deliberate attempt to delay and frustrate my complaint.

12. As a member of The Consumer Action Group I have shared my experience with others . It appears that the letters I have received from First Plus are ‘standard’ letters. Although they claim to address my points they are in fact uncannily the same as those sent to other people. This would seem to indicate that their complaints procedure is a sham.

13. As shown in the attached ‘final response’ First Plus have now offered a goodwill sum in order to end this complaint. I believe that this is a derisory sum bearing in mind my premium was £5979.00p. I wish this returned plus interest at 8% a grand total of £7462.72p

 

If your complaint is about a mortgage endowment, you will need to complete our special mortgage-endowment questionnaire, as well as this standard complaint-form. You can download the special questionnaire off our website – from the

frequently-asked-questions page (FAQs) at Financial Ombudsman Service. Or phone us on 0845 080 1800 for help.

 

 

From my thread...

alanalana PPI claim against RBS (looking for some help) please

 

7. Unfair attachment of PPI with no competition involvement

I now believe that the single premium PPI policies attached to the loan accounts were both extremely unfair and totally unreasonable and offered me very little, if any protection value whatsoever. Furthermore I believe in light of the preliminary finding by the Competition Commission that the PPI was unfairly attached as there was no opportunity for me to seek competitive Insurance. I am therefore requesting a full refund of all costs including all single PPI premiums that have been paid, the interest added to these premiums and the PPI proportion of the direct debit payments, that I have paid over the life of the account agreement.

This has been included in light of the preliminary findings by the Competition Commissioner .... and therefore I believe a new player in the game of PPI reclaiming.

aa

 

 

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay... complaint form and copies of all letters being posted to FOS tomorrow. Reply above being posted to FP in the morning. Lets see where it all goes.. :)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually I have an idea... why don't we all scan our letters from FP and see if they do match.. If they do then surely it can only help our complaints to the FOS and show they arent taking complaints seriously.

 

:rolleyes:

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

recieved a letter from Mr Green telling me thanks for my rejection of their offer but that is their last response. fair enuff...FOS complaint sent today by recorded delivery...hopefully they will investigate..if not its court time :)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello finlander,

 

it will now be a waiting game. Good luck with your complaint to FOS.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers for that.. I suspect it will be ...have just sent this to MR green by email

 

 

 

Dear Mr Green,

 

Thank you for your response of the 11th June. Please be aware, that as of today,this matter is now in the hands of the FOS.

 

Please also be aware that I am claiming back my original premium and 8% interest, as previously stated, and now all interest paid on the premium to First Plus while the loan was active.

 

I hope the rejection of my claim by your company is not simply a delaying tactic in the hope that I will 'go away', but sadly suspect it is.

 

Can you please note that I will continue this claim and whilst I do so the interest of 8% will continue to accrue until the date of settlement.

 

Should the FOS fail to investigate this due to the date of the transaction or offer anything less than the amount I am claiming I shall begin legal action against First Plus immediately.

 

I shall also be making enquires into a formal complaint with the CGIS of which your company was a member when this policy was taken out, and whose code of conduct your company is in clear breach of. Can you please provide me with a contact address for this organisation.

 

Please also note that I will be sending a formal complaint to the Information Commissioners Office tomorrow regarding the SAR I made and your companies delay in sending me the audio tapes of conversations with your representatives. My original Data Protection request asked for ALL records held by your company regarding my account. This would have included any recordings. They were not sent. Mr Mullins then said in his letter he would send them by next day delivery if I required them. I said I do require them and now I have been told it will take 40days!

 

Thank you for the promptness of your reply and I regret that the above actions have become necessary.

 

Your Truly

 

 

The waiting begins.................:p

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent letter Finlander - best of British - or should that be best of Finnish?:p

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

british.... finlander was the name of my first dog....gsd:)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

problem !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I have just got a letter through from the FOS.... Thank you for your complaint ..however..we are overwhelmed with complaints at the moment so might be a while before we get back to you.... rang them up...could be 6 months if FP don't give in before the complaint is dealt with:mad::mad::mad:

 

What now?... wait six months or court?... FOS man said court will be quicker........

 

:mad::mad::mad:

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's your decision to make Finlander, you need to weigh up the pro of getting possibly a quick result for some cost, or waiting longer and getting the result for free. Not sure if the possibility of a win is any more likely one way or the other ? (might the FOS remember the number of complaints they have against FP??)

If you are in a position to wait it out then that's what I would do. That way you still have the court route to fall back on.

 

(Obviously they would say its quicker if it means they get some cases off their list and onto someone elses, or maybe I've become to cynical!! )

 

 

Best of luck which ever you decide.

 

BHB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello finlander,

 

I would agree with braveheartbear's post. The FOS route will undoubtedly take longer and if more people go the FOS route then yet even longer. If you go down the FOS route I would also whack in complaints to the FSA, OFT, Trading Standards and any others you may wish to add. The more complaints about these companies the sooner more fines will (hopefully) be flying their way. Once they have a fine against them from the FSA then it should make claiming a little easier for the thousands that have yet to make a claim.

 

Your shout, but good luck which ever path you choose.;-)

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gonna stick with the FOS i think..

 

because

 

1. I still think it will be quicker ( 6 months is if they take it all the way)

2. It's free.. £210 in court

3. It costs them lots of money

4. It heaps up the presure on FP and the FOS

5. :)

 

 

so there......... :-D

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning Finlander,

 

My claim against First Plus is now in adjudicationa awaiting a result, I believe that this should be resolved within the next month. I had a £50,000 loan that i settled within 7 months. I was charged £9,700 for the privilage of the insurance some three years ago.

 

As soon as the result is known I will happily post here to give you a steer on the case. Does anybody know how interest is applied as I should be entitled to 3 years worth.

 

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tanks Johnny that would be very helpful...

 

;)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

letter from the fos stating they have appointed an investigator and will be in contact with me again soon:)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Dont hold your breath with the FOS, Finlander. Unless you accelerate your complaint (after passing the hurdles) you'll probably be dealing with an adjudicator who, whilst having an excellent grasp of the English language, doesn't have as strong a grasp on legal principles. If you argument is based on legal principles they will likely expect you to disprove the creditor's response regardless of its farsical nature and the nature of the legal obligation - ie. creditor innocent unless you can prove otherwise which may require you to produce documents that may be the crux of your complaint - ie. you have asked the creditor to produce and he is legally bound to produce the document under CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

I too am having an awful job with FP and am very interested in outcome of this, I have a complaint which has been with FOS for 2 years as they are so busy, my problem is that I had a loan with FP, in aug 2003 a couple of months later got a call from who we believed to be FP asking if we wanted a further advacne so we took a new loan ouit with added PPI we were told we had to have, it turned out 3 years later when I first started trying to reclaim PPi we spoke to a broker Central Trust who FP had given our details to and who pretended to be FP to get our business, Central trust were not regulated, First Plus say even though they gave them our details we bought it through Central Trust as so we are going round in circles and getting nowwhere so any advice greatly appreciated x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...