Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the welcome honeybee!  Grateful to have found this place! Just busy reading other excellent threads!
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I expect people will be along later to advise you. Weekends are always quieter here so please bear with us until they're able to get here. HB
    • Hope I'm posting in the correct forum. I am confused about procedure regarding going to civil court next week. The claimant (Erudio/Drydens) responded to my defence but I did not realise that I have to respond back.  I'd be grateful if you could answer:  Was I supposed to send them my updated defence and when?  If I ask the court to do it now,, if they agree, can I just send it to the court or must I also send it to Drydens?  I spoke to the court helpline and the lady said I can submit evidence even if it's a bit late (to go with my defence) so I've done that - I emailed it only to the court. I'm wondering if I need to submit this evidence to Drydens as well? THis is the situation;  I have a civil court case with Erudio/Drydens regarding a pre-1998 student loan. The amount is "£2500.  I did not defer as I didn't get the forms. My argument was that they mismanaged my account as they did not send me annual statements (I have proof - 2018 remediation pack)  I believe the same happened with the forms. I was eligible to defer and only three years away from 50 so no reason not to. I have not moved. I've submitted my defence in July 2019 after which the case was stayed. But as I failed to communicate with them to settle the matter (I didn't know I had to reply to their offers to settle as I did not think what they were offering was fair) they have filed an Application in Sept 2023 to lift the stay a week ago I received a pack in the post with the court date which is next week. The package arrived 6 working days before the hearing, not seven as it says in the rules. Drydens then sent me the same package in the post four working days before the hearing with a letter saying they are waiting for the Order to be lifted.  I'm worried now that they will not allow it to go to trial as Drydens claim that I have not submitted sufficient evidence. They although produced the copy of the deferment letters which they claim they sent. I didn't realise that I can amend my defence based on their reply to my defence. I thought the court was again going to send me a form to do that, like they did the first time.  I'm clueless and have no money for a legal representation as I'm not working at the moment.  Any help would be much appreciated!
    • Is elphicke still with labour or has she jumped into the frankly far more apt 'reformatory yet? Sure that her move is just intended to destabilise Sunack for the poopy right   I hear rumors Boris and Doris have tested the water through proxies - not sure if its true - and they probably happy to (are?) chance-it with all/any
    • HB - they don't ask why. Karalius - just note these dates on the form and you'll be safe, they will not fix the hearing date when you're away. How to fill in the DQ/N180 is on just about every claim form thread here, such as Andy's post 81 here  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/458783-parkingeye-anpr-pcn-paploc-now-claimform-new-directions-holdings-lambourne-crescent-llanishen-cardiff-cf14-5gl-claim-discontinued/page/4/#comments  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guarantor Agreement: About to sign...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5860 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Firstly I'd like to say Hi, this is my first post so please be gentle... :-)

 

I'm about to sign on the agreement, I've been reading around and I was wonder if anyone would mind taking a quick look and letting me know how it looks. I've read that the word deed is important to have on it, however, it is not present except in the document title and given I am to fax this back that will be lost. What are the implications? :)

 

The agreement is thus:-

In consideration of your agreeing to grant a Tenancy for the premises known as:

 

ADDRESS

 

Some place, somewhere...

 

to: Mr X

 

for a rent of £575.00 per calendar month, for a period of 6 months and thereafter month by month from 26/04/2008

 

I, helios2k8 hereby agree to be answerable to you for any and all rent reserved by the Tenancy Agreement which the Tenant shall be liable to pay to you. We shall also be answerable to you for any other duty under the Tenancy Agreement for which the Tenant shall be liable. We agree that I will pay the rent, in the event that the tenants shall not pay the same, in accordance with the Tenacy Agreement, until the end of the term of the Tenancy. We agree to pay all charges made against the ‘dilapidation deposit’ during the term of the Tenancy within 30 days of receipt of invoice, in the event that the tenants shall not pay the same in accordance with the Tenacy Agreement.

 

This guarantee is a continuing guarantee and security and our liability under it shall not be affected by your giving time or any other indulgence to the Tenant.

 

 

Can anyone help and say if there's anything in there I should be cautious of, etc...

 

Many thanks guys! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys,

 

I appreciate it's bad (n)etiquette to bump my own thread so soon but I had a particular question I'd like to add.

 

I've been reading the following URL: The Letting Centre - Factsheet 34 - Distance Selling Regulations 2000

 

This very much applies to me, I'm conducting this at a distance.

 

My hypothetical question is, since my agreement makes no mention of the DSR, once my brother signs the tenancy agreement.... If I cancel my guarantor agreement under the DSR would that void the tenancy agreement? (I also suspect since there's no mention of my right to cancel then it doesn't provide all required Written Information so I can cancel for up to 3 months and 7 days?)

 

Like I said, it's hypothetical.... but, yaknow.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Helios welcome to cag :)

I am not sure about your problem myself but wnated to say hiya.

I am sure some bright bod on here should be along, be patient it's a busy day today what with the bank charges case.

Good luck.

NS :)

:(:confused:Confused, sad,bewildered,befuddled,bemused,disorientated,lonley until I came here, moving forward to :smile::lol: ,trying not to let them drag me down.:cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

It makes a change for someone to seek advice before signing a guarantee.

 

Do not rely on the Distance Selling Regulations applying.

 

There are various reasons why this form may not be effective as a guarantee, but I will not go into them as they are not watertight.

 

Assuming therefore that the guarantee would be effective if you signed it, you would be best advised not to sign it. This is because it is not limited to time or amount - in other words it is open-ended. If you really want to sign then insist (a) it is limited to any default arising during the first six months (b) that it is limited in amount to, say, six months' rent and © that the landlord may not call on the guarantee until the deposit is used up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. :)

 

I noticed it doesn't specify deed and that could be one of the non-watertight things you mentioned.

 

I just happen to be between a rock and hard place... on the one hand I've got this really horrid open ended unlimited guarantor agreement and on the other I've got my brother who will have nowhere to live unless this form is signed for them to sign their tenancy on saturday. I only received this form today so it's all very high pressured and must be done soon with quite possibly no room for the guarantor agreement to be renegotiated!

 

Obviously that's kinda irrelevant for this forum... I might ask the them to think about rewording the agreement but at the end of day I'll probably end up signing it - unfortunately.

 

So when I'm back in a few months, can we explore those other non-watertight points? :D

 

I guess worst comes to worst (from what I read in another thread) I can give reasonable notice once it turns periodic.

 

Advice appreciated, but unfortunately, probably won't be heeded... :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like you need to play a game of poker. The agent may be taking advantage of the situation to get a guarantee, but at the end of the day, the landlord wants to let.

 

The really important thing is not to enter into the guarantee unless you can afford to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, thought I'd update. I put on my best poker face/voice but they wouldn't budge so unfortunately I've signed the agreement as-is.

 

(I can afford to pay so I'm not particularly worried at the end of the day, plus, I know my brother has in savings enough to pay the rent for at least 12 months if not more. Nevermind income.)

 

One thing I am curious about though, I managed to get a copy of the AST agreement:-

 

I noticed that I'm named under section 1.1 (Parties):-

 

1.1.4 The Guarantor

Name: helios2k8

Contact Address: CAG forum

Contact Telephone Number: 01234567890

Contact Fax Number:

Contact Email Address: [email protected]

...and then section 8 gives some guarantor stuff:-

 

8 Guarantor

 

8.1 In consideration for the Landlord granting the Tenant a tenancy of the Property, the Guarantor agrees to pay the Landlord and the Landlord’s Agent for any reasonable losses suffered as a result of the Tenant failing to fulfil any of his obligations under this agreement or failing to pay Rents or other monies lawfully due.

 

8.2 The Guarantor agrees to pay, on demand and in full, any overdue Rent or other monies lawfully due under this agreement for the full Term and until vacant possession is given to the Landlord.

 

8.3 The Guarantor agrees to make payments lawfully due under clause 8.1 or 8.2 even after the Tenant has yielded up possession.

 

8.4 If this contract is a “distance contract” as defined in the Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000, then, subject to the required information having been provided to the Guarantor, the 7 day “cooling off” period will cease immediately the provision of the service commences, in accordance with regulation 8(3) of the above regulations. This means that you will be committed to this guarantor agreement once the Tenant takes on the Property.

Then there is space underneath for the landlord's, tenants', guarantor's signature.

 

So my question is they have not asked me to sign this page of the tenancy agreement, so does my agreement given in the first post bind me to the terms set out above in section 8 given I haven't been asked to sign the actual tenancy agreement ?

 

(Is there anything to bear in mind if they ask me to sign the tenancy agreement after the tenancy as commenced and the landlord & tenants have signed...?)

 

Many thanks!

 

Sorry if I'm overloading with questions, I just like to understand where I'm at... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...