Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak actually nailed it in his boring speech yesterday  Starmers only offering is vote to be depressed  Just about sums up lefties  Humourless and Depresive🤣
    • Ah ok I will see if we receive it in the post tomorrow before I go to work. We want to see theirs so we know what documents they will list ? If their N265 is not received then best to send ours so that we do not miss the claimants deadline as per their draft directions.  What would happen if we did miss the deadline even by 1 day ? The claimant would use it against us in court ?  I scanned and posted in #159 the claimants continuation sheet attached to the N244 where they give a background of the case and reference e-mails etc. After this I will continue to work on the WS which is also causing me anxiety. This will also be used to object to their SJ application. I will advise tomorrow if anything else is received.  
    • Last September our 2019 plate Motorhome went to Brownhills of Newark for its annual habitation check/service. Whilst on their site for the day one of their drivers managed to drive it into a lamp post and put a 2m long scratch down the side of the body. They didn't own up to the damage, but luckily we noticed it before leaving the site, at which point the admitted fault and said they would fix it in house rather than go through the insurance. As they are an authorised Motor home repairer etc we agreed to this and a time frame of 3 weeks was given for the repair, which was booked in for late November. It could not be booked in sooner for the repair as we had a weekends away etc booked with the vehicle until mid November.  3 weeks, and a simple re-spray has now evolved to 18 weeks of them having the vehicle, due to the spray job having to be done 3 times, a window seal not been re-fitted correctly, leading to rain water pouring into the van and the replacement decals been applied wrong twice & having to be re-ordered from Elddis who originally built the camper. We finally got the vehicle back in late April, still minus 1 of the decals. Back in March we had an email from Brownhills asking what compensation we would accept due to the delays in returning the vehicle to us (They have had it for 18 weeks instead of the initial 3 weeks which was agreed). Once we finally got the vehicle back we told them what we expected (the value that the camper has depreciated by in the extra 15 weeks they have had it and which time we were unable to use it). They are now refusing to honour any compensation and are only offering us a free service for when this is due in September. Legally where do we stand?  Obviously we are not taking it back to them for a service, given that last time they managed to crash it and its taken so long for them to make such a simple repair. We are considering legal action, but are not really sure under what grounds/legislation we could claim. Any advice would be much appreciated.
    • Usual alarmist tripe from the Guardian exposed🤣     Many of the ‘Climate Experts’ Surveyed by the Guardian in Recent Propaganda Blitz Turn Out to be Emotionally-Unstable Hysterics – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG Last week, the Guardian published a survey of 383 'climate experts' and – shock – many of them turned out to be... The Guardian last week published its survey of ‘climate experts’. The results are a predictable mush of fire-and-brimstone predictions and emotional incontinence. This stunt may have convinced those already aligned to the newspaper’s ideological agenda to redouble their characteristically shrill rhetoric, but encouraging scientists to speculate and emote about the future of the planet looks like an act of political desperation, not scientific communication.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hfc Cc


RoyalNelly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5716 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All can i ask for some info & advice re: my position with HFC.

 

I wrote to let them know I was having finacial difficulties, and make a pro-rata offer, HFC begrudgingly agreed but started being difficult & phoning constantly. After one particulary obnoxious call I decided to CCA & SAR them.

 

Next I recieved a letter from HFC saying that although I had an agreement in place it was not enough for them and they were going to default the account.

 

Rec'd Default notice in post (delivered 10 whole days after the date on the notice)

 

On day 12, I recieved a reply to the CCA reuest by Special Delivery! this contained my last 6 statements, a without prejudice letter detailng when my account was opened, the original credit limit etc etc. The letter goes on to say that they ca'nt locate a copy of the agreement at his time and that they will forward it on.

 

So clearly the account is now in dispute and they will get a letter to that effect after the further 30 days has expired.

 

I would really appreciate some thoughts on what to do about the default notice, I believe the ammounts to be wrong (due to many charges), my name is spelt incorectly and i'm not overly convinced its in the prescribed format.

 

What do you reckon the best course to follow now? your thoughts and advice as always are appreciated.

 

RN

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default notices are legal documents that have to contain certain criteria as laid down in the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1993.

 

They have to contain the following:

  • Name and address of creditor issuing default notice and name and address of the borrower.
  • Type of agreement and details of the breach of the agreement.
  • Early settlement figure (for fixed sum only).
  • The action to be taken by you to remedy the situation and comply with the agreement.
  • The next action that the creditor intends to takes, should you fail to comply with the agreement.

It's very important that default notices are correct legally as there is case law which states so:

 

Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain & Co NLD 14 July 1998.

 

 

Also in the regs it states:

 

(2) Any notice to be given by a creditor or owner in relation to a regulated agreement to a debtor or hirer under section

87(1) of the Act (which relates to the necessity to serve a default notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section

88 before taking certain action by reason of any breach of the agreement by the debtor or hirer) shall contain--

 

 

(a) a statement that the notice is a default notice served under section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

 

Therefore it follows that if it doesn't include that statement it isn't doesn't comply with the law regarding default notices.

 

Hope this helps

 

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A quick update:

 

Still no CCA 12+2+30 expires 17th May so they will get a note putting the account in dispute.

 

In response to my SAR i have recieved 6 years worth of statements and my £10 back, so I have sent them a letter giving them a further 10 days to comply (as a gesture of goodwill) and sent them back the £10.

 

Have just taken a call from a collection agency asking for payment, they allege that HFC have sent a number of letters that I have not recieved, I pointed out that they may have siad that they sent them but perhaps they did'nt, nearly wet myself when he responded that they would'nt as they are a proffessional organisation!! Anway I declined the offer to pay them as the account is in dispute, they have suggested that they will be starting legal action. I do hope so!

 

Any thing else I should be doing at this point (claim for charges?) or wait and see what their next move is.

 

Thanks

RN

Link to post
Share on other sites

very similar letter to mine rec'd today except they sent me what they call a copy of my legal agreement which really is only an application. (I hope!!).

 

that's all I got as well.....I'm having fun with DCA's at the minute-I'll have them chasing their tails by the time I've finished!! LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grrr

 

Letter back from HFC re my SAR

 

"We would be grateful if you could compete the attached form and forward it to the address indicated. We will require a copy of your driving licencse or valid passport. We will action your request upon receipt of the completed form"

 

They have once again returned my £10 PO.

 

Anyoone got a suitable letter reminding them that the clock is ticking and they have been happy so far to send my info without my D.L. or Passport.

 

Thanks

RN

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Not posted for awhile so a quick update and request for advice.

 

HFC have still not responded to CCA and S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), but have passed the account on to Debt Litigation and Recovery Services (who I assume are part of HFC).

 

They have written a couple of times and have been told that the accout is in dispute until such time as the CCA request is complied with. Subsquently they have written saying that HFC Bank archive Department have been unable to locate a copy of the agreement and to contact the Beneficial Finance Branch where I took out this account, as they may be able to provide a copy. (Hah as if i'm going to do that).

 

Following on from this letter I have recieved a letter from HFC saying that they can not provide a copy of the agreement, but have enclosed a completely blank pro-forma agreement. This looks like it dates from 03/01 (not even close date wise) and has terms and conditions on one side, and a list of penalty charges and a cancellations form on the other. They are stating that this is sufficient under regulation 3 of the Consumer Credit (cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regs 1983.

 

Surely it is unacceptable to send any old bit of stationery that could relate to anyone or anything and say that it fulfills their obligations.

 

Any advice as to how to respond and proceed with this please.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...