Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ET1 & Grievance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5852 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Normally it is wise to to have exhausted disciplinary and grievance processes before proceeding to Tribunal, as any award can be affected where employees go straight to ET without due process. It doesn't though exclude you from making a claim, and if you suspect that the employer is dragging their heels in responding in order to time out a claim then the Tribunal will take a dim view of the employer's actions.

 

Depending on just how 'close' the time limit is, then it would be appropriate to give the employer a nudge by Recorded Delivery giving them a final time period in which to respond. That would certainly be taken into account and would most probably work in your favour in any judgement.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can, and probably should.

 

There is an odd gap in the regulations in that if the grievance is still on-going when the usual deadline expires then you get a automatic extension. However if you get the final response to the grievance only a short time before the deadline, the same does not apply.

 

It is not unknown for employers to delay the response to the grievance to such a point where you only have a couple of days to submit the ET1.

 

At the very least you should have it all written, in the envelope and ready to post, and if you get close to the date then send it in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot submit your ET1 until 28 days after the grievance has been lodged, unless it's a very particular set of circumstances involving 2 separate claims. After the 28 days have expired then you should submit the ET1, and request a stay (sist in scotland) if the grievance procedures are still being gone through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice guys :)

 

Looks like im going to have to submit it anyway as im going to resign, i can't see a way forward :(

 

One of the most frustrating things about my whole ordeal is that i've been trying to get legal advice through my union and four months on i am still being denied it. I guess being harrased, bullied, intimidated and not to mention being denied my rights according to the DDA for well over a year isn't that serious to them.

 

Makes me wonder why i bothered paying my subs when i could have saved them up and maybe i would have been able to afford some legal advice. :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if you resign and don't have any income or savings, you should be able to get legal aid for a Solicitor to do at least the preliminary stages. If the case is complex enough you might even get legal aid for the full hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They knew of my disability well over a year ago, they also had occupational health reports over a year ago with advice regarding what would cause me problems and what would not.

The advice has been ignored numerous times by putting me on jobs that was advised for me not to do even though i always told them time and time again. It kinda chips away at you having to keep saying that you can't do X due to pain and difficulty even though they were fully aware, even more so when they take no notice and put me on the jobs anyway.

 

I never knew about the DDA until recently, this was after a breakdown at work and the doctor had signed me on the sick for work related stress/depression which i am still off for at present.

 

I had to go back to the occupational health and they said that their advice from the original report remains unchanged with regards to work. They also said that i am likely to be covered by the DDA.

 

This is when i looked into the DDA and i couldn't believe my eyes. If they had followed the act i wouldn't be in the position i am in now. :(

 

That's just part of what's been going on, there's a whole lot more :(

 

I'm annoyed with myself for allowing this to happen over such a long period of time, kidding myself that everything will be ok one day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anywhere that i can find examples of completed ET1 forms or pointers?

 

Can there be a massive difference with the outcome depending on how i fill it in?

I just don't want to make a mistake that would be in their favour because of my non existent experience with tribunals.

 

Looks like i'm on my own with this so need to do some speed swatting :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not clear to me if your employer has been advised that you have a disability in accordance with the DDA.

 

Has the occupational health specialist actually advised your employer that you suffer a disability in accordance with the DDA and do you have that advise in writing. Alternatively have you written to your employer and advised them that you suffer a disability in accordance with the DDA.

 

You mention that your employer was advised "regarding what would cause me problems and what would not.". Were these day to day activities or work related activities.

 

When you complete the ET1 I advise

1. Write it as a story

2. Include each incident

3. Include time and date of each incident

4. For each incident include the way it made you feel

5. Include everything for which you want a remedy including everything you want compensation for

Link to post
Share on other sites

During a recent grievance meeting my employer said they were aware of my disability around Oct06 (witnessed) which i was surprised at as i was expecting them to say from the date of the occupational health report which was several months later.. Oct 06 is when i was finally diagnosed with my condition.

 

The advice from occupational health was regarding work activities but those activities are also day to day activities. I have copies of these reports.

 

Thanks again for your advice, it's all very appreciated :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...