Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I haven’t reply, so the hearing hasn’t been decided 
    • whitelist - the same with mine....the battery had a mind of its own. i bought it for my Son...he'd shut it down and it would be completely off but the power light would either stay on or flash...also it wouldnt start properly, had cmos errors on boot and other stuff.   i bought it through HP store on ebay ..brand new. after 6 days of receipt i recieced an email from HP asking if i was happy...i returned an email saying no and that i want to send it back as it was faulty (basically the email served as a reminder for me to leave them good feedback lol...not as a geniune enquiry to actually make sure i was happy with as they didnt reolve the issue when i was not) after trying to sort it for a couple of months with HP not replying, not offering a solution etc i finally got passed tech support who confirmed it was faulty. i then had to return it to their factory. this is where its gets beyond worse...waited 3 times for parcelforce to collect - they didnt. in the end HP sent me a label which i had to take to the post office - not good as im disabled with a mobility disability. then they asked for my bank account number to issue the refund. they hardly ever replied to my emails and it took over a month and a half to refund me once they had received the laptop back. no explanation, no progress emails, no updates. i kept emailing them on a daily basis as no one would reply to my emails through the website, forum, internal email addresses and even phoned 3 different departments who basically had no idea what to do or what was going on and did not help...they couldnt even tell me when the refund would be issued, let alone why it hadnt been done already. on the forums theres other customers who've had to wait 6 weeks , 2 months , over 2 months etc...it seems as though HP like to with hold peoples money to earn interest on the money in their account. i spents days phoning and emailing them - even sent a recorded letter. at the begining i phoned citizens advice and they said i am entitled to put back into the same financial position as before i lost the out of pocket expenses ie: compensation for my time and recorded letter sent etc. ive started a martin lewis 'resolver' case with them and basically in a snotty reply they told me im not entitled to compensation which is contradictory to what citizens advice told me. i was just wondering if theres any .gov website or law/legislation that i could reply with and say "no your wrong - please compensate me"
    • LBC is here. Complete with a note showing a phantom payment. What to do next?
    • I suppose it doesn't make a massive amount of difference as Kev has never had the guts to do court - well at least not yet - but to me the number of cards played still needs to be reduced.  Given the OP has already referred to the "very busy and overflowing car park" in the appeal I'd refer to that and tell Kev to go and look up case no.3JD08399.
    • thanks ftmdave again for the help with letter. thanks lookinforinfo for the info, im glad i found this forum as its a great comfort and relief to know ive dont the right thing as i wasnt too sure at first. and good to know what excel are really like.   thanks guys.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Has anyone else had the situation where Rossendales have said that they have sent letter after letter and you have not received them.

 

I am in a situation where Rossendales have two liability orders. They have said that they have now written to me on at least four occasions and have provided the dates - I have not received any of these letters.

 

Yesterday I came home to another bailiff letter chasing for a liability order obtained in Jan 08 with a notice of seizure. I have received absolutely no correspondence prior to this that Rossendales are dealing with this debt and no letter providing me with 14 days notice of a bailiffs attendance to seize.

 

I am beginning to suspect that Rossendales are making these letters up and not actually posting them!! I advised the bailiff over the phone of this and I have to say for once this particular bailiff was very nice and helpful and I have to say he was dismayed at Rossendales and was not doing the job by choice. He in fact commented that he would not ever give Rossendales a reference which says it all.

 

I have advised Rossendales if necessary I will swear an affidavit to the effect that I have not received any correspondence.

 

Has this happened to anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have given you a notice to seize goods when you have not signed a walking possession order? Is this for council tax?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is, although I do not think the bailiff intend to pursue it after I informed him that I had absolutely no correspondence from Rossendales giving me 14 days notice of a bailiff's visit, he understood that he was at risk of losing some of his bond for not checking this information if I made a complaint. He also acknowledged that in this case it was probably an unlawful levy.

 

I really want to find out if others have been told by Rossendales that letters have been sent out that they haven't received. It seems strange that I haven't received any of the approximately 7/8 letters Rossendales say they sent!!!! I smell a rat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do too - I would report Rossendale's to the council - they are responsible for the actions of the bailiffs, after all.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems a common theme amongst certain bailiff companys (Rossendales being one of them) to claim to have sent countless numbers of letters out, but the people who were supposed to have received them never have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is completely frustrating as it is one rule for us and one for them.

 

If we want to prove we sent a letter we have to send it recorded delivery. but if they send a letter we just have to take their word for it. Anybody got any suggestions how to deal with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact the council, as suggested.

 

They also cannot charge you for letters sent - only bailiffs first and second visits and then, if there is a WPO, attendance to remove goods and van hire.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tiglet, talking of Rossendales, I had the same sort of situation, they said that they sent letter after letter in respect council tax debt - I didn't pay this straightaway and they added charge after charge on top for letters, they added for visits and also for van removal costs, even though no van was ever seen. I did eventually pay all of this :-( are they allowed to add for van removal costs if no walking possession agreement has been signed, and if so could I go back to them to try and get this charge back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they cannot charge if no WPA was agreed.

 

I would suggest you write to them and ask for a full breakdown of costs and then post back so we can advise further.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've bee corresponding with Bristol City Council as I thought we had an agreement in place to repay outstanding Council Tax. However their letter to me date a few days ago said that they had put the account in the hands of their Baliffs - Rossendales.

 

I just put their name into Google and came up with an old thread that suggested that their tactics were a little extreme (bullying and threatening behavour). Does anyone know if they still do this?

 

I'm still trying to go directly with the Council and sort this out, and i've asked them to suspend any further action until they have. Should i copy this to Rossendales, or do you think this would alert them early?

 

Any helpful advice would be appreciated. By the way their is an iron garden gate that they can't get through unless I let them in, should I not let them anywhere near our front door, if they do turn up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, back again after a couple of months of still getting nowhere with the council and Rossendales they are still sending letter after letter. Can any one clarify with absolute legal certainty (not just opinions or probablies) the following points:

 

1. Can the bailiffs charge for a van attendance and associated fees if no levy has previously been made?

 

2. Can the council tax insist on higher repayments as council tax is a priority debt if you are paying payments to credit cards etc. I want to avoid paying less to my cards etc as this will obviously damage my credit rating as I will be in breach of the credit agreements if they take lower payments.

 

3. Can the bailiffs re-attend a property a 1 year later of the first attendance with no corresponence in between - is there any time frame they are regulated by?

 

4. Is the magistrates court liability order regarded as the same required notice of bailiffs attendance with van giving 14 days notice under Schedule 5?

 

5. If so, does the liability notice have to provide a break down of fees under Schedule 5 (and as stated in Section 5) to be legal? (the liability order itself does not include this information).

 

I could really do with clarification on these points as I am preparing a case for unlawful charges and unprofessional behaviour to go to the mags court under the complaints procedure for the bailiffs bond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition the particular charming bailiff I have had dealings with was named in last weeks Eastbourne Herald (just google rossendales and eastbourne herald for article). If anyone else has had problems and fancies make a joint complaint to the mags court to have his certificate removed then send me a private message.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, back again after a couple of months of still getting nowhere with the council and Rossendales they are still sending letter after letter. Can any one clarify with absolute legal certainty (not just opinions or probablies) the following points:

 

Then you should speak to a solicitor...

 

1. Can the bailiffs charge for a van attendance and associated fees if no levy has previously been made?

 

No. The law doesn't prescribe any such fee as a 'van fee'.

 

2. Can the council tax insist on higher repayments as council tax is a priority debt if you are paying payments to credit cards etc.

 

Yes. Section 21© Consumer Credit Act 1974. The council is an authority so it doesn't need to be licensed to charge a fee for processing a credit transaction between a lender (card issuer) and a borrower (card holder) .

 

I want to avoid paying less to my cards etc as this will obviously damage my credit rating as I will be in breach of the credit agreements if they take lower payments.

 

Offer the council a lower amount each month.

 

3. Can the bailiffs re-attend a property a 1 year later of the first attendance with no corresponence in between - is there any time frame they are regulated by?

 

I THINK it's 90 days because a Liability Order must be executed by that time limit.

 

4. Is the magistrates court liability order regarded as the same required notice of bailiffs attendance with van giving 14 days notice under Schedule 5?

 

 

5. If so, does the liability notice have to provide a break down of fees under Schedule 5 (and as stated in Section 5) to be legal? (the liability order itself does not include this information).

 

No.

 

I could really do with clarification on these points as I am preparing a case for unlawful charges and unprofessional behaviour to go to the mags court under the complaints procedure for the bailiffs bond.

 

To make an official complaint against a bailiff you complete a Form 4: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/form4_0606.pdf

First to fly the Airbus A380

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for the response.

 

The ironic thing is that both myself and my husband work for a law firm but don't want to get them involved until we have to just for personal reasons - but will if we have too!

 

When I referred to van fees what I meant is that the bailiffs turned up a year later than their first visit with a van - no previous levy had been made and have charged £150.00 for this visit. Cany they do this without a levy and a year on.

 

Also you replied no to my question 5 but do you know the answer to my question 4.

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in respect of my offer of payments I have offered £50.00 per month but am paying approximately £250.00 per month to unsecured lenders and the council tax office say I must renegotiate with the unsecured lenders and pay less to them and more to the council office and this is what I mean by having a negative effect on my credit rating for breach of their contracts. Is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Su0906 - I keep saying this on posts, but whatever is written on your liability order is ALL what you owe. No more. There is no provision for bailiffs fees of any description. Pay off the the amount on the liability order (If you don't have it the amount will be written in a letter from the council, advising you of their intention to apply for a liability order) and that is it. Job done, Rossendales are history. Don't bother with them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that - I am surprised the liability order makes no reference to costs as is usual in the county court for enforcement of the debt but it seems you are correct. The council did tell me though that costs were included in the order is there any way of getting absolute clarification as if this is correct I certainly won't waste any more time on it and will be very relieved as it is only the costs I am disputing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Fair-Parking

 

I have done some digging now and really unfortunately I think you are wrong that there is no provision in the liability order to pay bailiff's costs.

 

Have a look at Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 which govern liability orders. In particular I refer you to Section 45 (1) and (2) which specifically refers to costs incurred with distress under Schedule 5 (to the layman bailiff's costs).

 

Let me know what you think as obviously you don't want to be giving out incorrect information to people as you have said you have advised many that bailiff costs are not recoverable - are you sure??? I really hope I'm wrong and your right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paras 33, 34 35 and 36 are more relevant with 33 (1) being specific on the fact that the authority must account for 'every amount in respect of which the authority is to make the application'.

 

Para 45 refers to charges and levy fees being made after goods have been sold with no reference to visits that never led to a levy.

 

More importantly none of the paragraphs make any provision to private bailiffs (Rossendales) or appointed agents. Indeed para 45 2-3 refers to the authority taking walking possession.

 

The reality of this being that once the amount on the liability order is paid, there's nowhere for bailiffs to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a point I would love to get legal interpretation of. I would think though even if bailiff costs can not be reclaimed without a sucessful levy and sale of items the term "authority" would be interpreted by a Judge as meaning their agents as well.

 

Do you know of any instances where the council have been sucessful in enforcing bailiff fees once their liability has been settled. Is there any legal precedent for this.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I haven't but I do know of many instances where bailiffs ceased to pursue the amount, including two of the more well known firms that are consistently mentioned on this forum.

 

I'm sure that if they thought that there was any chance of being paid they would continue to harass and bully.

 

May I suggest you pay the council and then see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a problem with Rossendales too - they have collected £1000 from me and I refused to pay any more until they clarified the charges (over 250). They have now passed it back to the council and they have only been passed £700 ish of the money I paid to rossendales. Can they charge that much for collection of council tax?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...