Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Thames Credit Ltd/GE Capital Advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I recentlly received a letter from Thames Credit saying that I owed them £1500 from a credit agreement in 2004 that was defaulted against my name in Nov 2007. I knew that it was a 12 month intrest free agreement for a computer that I bought from Comet as I still had the agreement and checked the number. I rang and payed this agreement off in Oct 2005 over the phone before the 12 months deadline so that I would not have to pay any intrest. The account as far as I was concerned and from what they said was then closed, so I cancelled my direct credit, recently after I moved house.

 

I rang Thames Credit and GE Capital, even Active Capital but noone would give me any information about the account or the payments only that the last payment that I had paid was in Oct 2005 for £800 (my closing amount) but the account was not closed!

(I'm wondering that even though GE Capital took it over the phone they did not put it through until after the deadline so that I incurred the intrest charges!!)

 

After looking through this forum I have now sent off the letter asking for my CCA.

Yesterday I received the bog standard letter saying that 'they are not the original creditor blah blah blah but as good practise will seek the agreement from the credit grantor'. This is all fine, what worries me is that at the bottom it says that 'unless we hear from you by telephone or writing within 7 working days the matter will be passed back to there collection division'.

 

Has any one else had this letter as this part is slightly different to the letters I have seen on this forum. Is there a letter I should now send them back within the seven days or should I wait to see if they can send me the credit agreement and balance statements etc with in the 12days set out?

 

Thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

JUst another threat-o-gram from some stupid DCA chasing a debt that doesnt exist, do keep the letter but file under ignore, see what they come up with, and if you paid over the phone you bank/credit card company must have these details, so you could get those if you need proof later on.

But the onus is on them not you no matter what they say and DO NOT RING THEM EVER

All comments are well meant but i am not legally qualified only CAG educated:D

 

 

In the slight chance i have been helpful please click the scales:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard proof is the only way with these ***** (and even then, they're a bit slow :rolleyes: ). Get a copy of your bank/credit card statement showing the payment and send it to them with a covering letter. Request their complaints procedure at the same time and send all recorded, keeping copies of everything.

 

Good luck and best wishes.

 

Almost forgot...If these things cost you much, request compensation ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting statements at the moment. My only worry is that even though I paid GE Capital over the phone the payment was not processed until after the deadline date. The statement will show the processed date not the date I rang. All hearsay until my statements come through so I will have to wait and see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant remember as it was so long ago, I think they did.

 

Its getting even more weird now as today I received a letter from Aktiv Kapital for FORMAL NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF DEBT.

 

It says that all communications now has to be through them and that imediate payment on the full amount is now required. Does this mean that I have now got to send them a letter asking for the CCA? Are Thames Capital now nothing to do with the debt?

I know that they are a sister company but should I just be communicating with one company.

They seem to make things very confusing

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weirdness continues, today I received 2 letters from Activ Kapital. The first saying

'We refer to your recent communication and write to confirm that your offer of re-payment has been accepted'.

Repayments of £5 a month starting this month. I have not contacted them apart from send a letter asking for the CCA, so this is very annoying. They also sent me the letter saying that

'They have no obligation to provide the CCA as I have also acknowledged the account by agreeing to make payments of £5 a month. However as a matter of good practise we will seek to obtain a copy of the original agreement blah blah'

What should I do now as I have in no way acknowledged the account!! I was going to phone but have decided to seek more advise on what to do now.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

All the information has been sent to Aktiv and Thames showing on a statement a bulk amount being paid in October 2005.

I have also complained to the OFT due to still not receiving my CCA or statements after asking on the 7th of April 08. The OFT said they are looking into it.

I am still receiving harrasing letters from Thames and I now have a default on my credit file 1 month before I look at re mortgaging my house :mad:.

 

What more can I now do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, where they said that you have aknowledged the debt - that is just rubbish, so don't worry about that. It would only matter if it were potentially statute barred, in other words you hadn't paid anything for 6 years - which doesn't apply in your case.

 

If you are looking at remortgaging with a different lender then having a default on your account from 2007 will not be good. I don't know to what extent your current lender will take this into account.

 

There was a recent court case (it was in scotland though - which is a bit different) where someone was in exactly the same situation and they were awarded a large amount of damages - although the default had been on there for several years, the case is here:-

 

RICHARD DURKIN v. DGS RETAIL LIMITED+HFC BANK PLC, 26 March 2008, Sheriff J K Tierney

 

The following suggestions are based on the fact that you did pay off the debt in full within the time period.

 

Wrongly processing your data would be covered by the ICO, I suggest that you make a complaint to them, however it will be a couple of months before you get any reply from them:-

 

Information Commissioner's Office - ICO

 

I would suggest sending them a s10 dpa notice. They have 3 weeks in which to respond to this. If they don't then you can take them to court and claim damages for the extra cost of your new mortgage because of having a default and you can also claim general damages as well.

 

I would also suggest sending an sar to the original creditor that you paid the £800 so that you have evidence from their own systems as well that you paid it off in full. If you are starting a court case then, generally, the burden of proof lies with you to show what has happened. So, it's probably best to get all the evidence you can first.

 

A s10 dpa notice would look something like this:-

 

The Data Controller

DCA

Notice Pursuant to Section 10, Data Protection Act 1998

Account No: xxxxxxxx

Dear Sir,

Take Notice that I require you to cease entirely from processing, or else that you do not begin to process, any personal data of which I am the subject within 7 days of the receipt by you of this notice.

This includes particularly, but is not limited to, any processing involving the communication or passing of personal data of which I am the subject to any third party insofar as the said data relates wholly or in part to any alleged agreement between us that it is alleged has been assigned to you.

This Notice is given on the ground that the debt has been paid in full on xx/xx/2005. As a result you had no right to place a default marker on that account with xx (Experian/Equifax – whoever it was you checked) Credit Reference Agency.

Further, the processing or continued processing by you of the said data will be likely to affect my credit rating and my reputation and cause substantial damage and/or distress to me in addition to that which may already have been caused and that, as the processing of the said data in the way referred to in this notice would violate the first, fourth and sixth principles of the Data Protection Act 1998, to do so would be unwarranted.

If you fail to respond to this notice within the prescribed timescale I will make an application to the court under Section 10(4) Data Protection Act that you be ordered to comply with this notice.

This letter has been sent by Recorded Delivery.

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not sent the Notice of Pursuant yet as I have now started a complaint with FOS.

 

The incompetence of Aktiv Kapital and Thames Credit has amazed me. I sent them details of the agreement, payments from bank statements, all which they should have. I have not received anything showing any details of the debt from them even though I sent a letter asking for the CCA on the 7th of April .

Even with all the proof that the agreement was paid off before the 12month deadline date they sent a letter back saying that from the information that I had provided it proved that I had missed the 12month deadline and was liable to the interest on the agreement. Did they actually read the letter that I had sent or looked at any of the dates on the agreement!

I have now sent the same letter back again with all the dates enlarged and bold. If this did go to court I'm shocked at how bad there incompetence would look.

Hopefully the FOS TS or OFT can sort this out in some capacity?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now received a letter back from Aktiv Kapital saying that they are looking into my complaint from the FOS and reverting back to the original creditor (GE Capital). They aim to get back to me within 28 days. Is there anything else I can do now in this time to get my default removed or is it now a waiting game?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...