Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
    • Hello all, just got this from my bank today.   ” Update on your payment refund As you know we temporarily refunded the amount(s) of £381.98 to your account pending investigation. We’re pleased to confirm that an additional amount of £359.99 has also been refunded to your account by the retailer on 18th March 2024. What will happen next To correct this situation, arrangements will be made on 6th June 2024 to reverse the original refund supplied from us.  Our file in respect of this matter will now be closed, which we trust is satisfactory.”   Not sure what to do as I was previously told if I hear nothing back after a certain date that would be the case closed now it’s been changed to the 6th of June. and as you see I’m not getting a full refund I don’t know wether to contact them again and try to get the £20, or if I even can at this point? Thanks again.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Toucan still reporting to my credit file?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I had Toucan broadband. I missed the odd payment with them but stopped using them over a year ago. I settled all debts etc. Toucan still seems to be reporting to experian and looks like i still have an account with them. Its showing the missed payments too.

Is there anyway I can get toucan to remove their entry from my credit file? And any other settled accounts that show late payments that have been closed for a couple of years?

 

Kind Regards

 

D

Link to post
Share on other sites

mmm...well to answer your question yes and no...

 

OK No because they (creditors) all claim that "the standard industry practice..." is to hold on to your info and report to the credit reference agencies for upto six years after the end of the relationship....

 

No - because that is genrally cr@p and they do not have any LEGAL right to do so...I suggest you read up on here and you will see the answers are there for you to follow...

 

For a start read this by Car:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/111211-defaults-background-removal-methods.html

 

All the best and good luck,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my account has been closed since may 2007 is it not against the Data Protection Act 1998 to update my file? Can I send a data subject

notice as the account has been closed for nearly a year but they are still showing it as £0 balanace and open?

As toucan are showing the account as open and updating my credit file then is this data inacurate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup it is, they will reply (usually) saying that they can process your info for upto six years and if you question it they will say "standard industry practise"...

 

Have you read they Surelybonds thread? Read and follow and if you have the money and nerves take them to court for breaches of DPA...I am about to do it for several creditors...But then again mine have left me with bad credit so I have the damaging issue....difficult for you to say that if it says £0 balance and no missed payments etc...

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the payment history is accurate, you'll find it hard to convince them - and certainly a Judge - that it should be removed, IMHO.

 

If it's inaccurate, that's another matter...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it should have been marked as settled May 2007. So in my eyes its inaccurate. And since the account was closed then I don't see why it should still show as open and them continue to update my credit file. If the account was marked as settled that they had not continued to update my credit file then that would be correct. As it stands it showing as open and there for will remain on my credit file for longer.

So I was going to send them a letter along these lines :

I have held home phone and broadband accounts with you over that ended in May 2007.

After recently obtaining a copy of my credit file from Experian I was concerned to note that your company has been updating an account in my name. The account still appears to be open although it has a balance of £0.

As the account was closed with toucan in May 2007 the information you are sharing with the credit reference agencies is incorrect you are in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. Please take note of the following principles of the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

3) Personal data shall be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purpose or purposes for which they are processed.

4) Personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date.

5) Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes.

6) Personal data shall be processed in accordance with the rights of data subjects under this Act.

This data has caused question with other communications providers about the status of open accounts at my current address, and in turn has caused me distress when an application has been questioned over this incorrect data.

My written permission allowing Toucan to continue processing, or disclosing, my personal subject data was revoked upon termination of that original contract and I hereby reiterate that revocation.

Therefore I am contesting that the Toucan continued processing of my data is an unwarranted act and I enclose a Statutory Notice to that effect, which is deemed served as of the date noted on the Royal Mail's Recorded Delivery service audit.

I look forward to hearing back with a response and suitable action to resolve this issue.

 

I know it may seem trivial, but with todays credit situation I would like to get my file as clean as possible and remove any information I can that would lower my score

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...