Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called.    I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job.    However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still have sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
    • The clock is ticking for savings providers. They now have just a few weeks left to get their act together and start offering loyal customers a good deal.View the full article
    • Thank you dx I'll get on with it  Much appreciated  H
    • Can we have a picture of the damage. It might be a lot easier than you think to do a cosmetic repair.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg credit card agreement terminated


toymaker1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

This is fascinating reading and I'm so glad I've read this thread and hopefully it will be useful.

I was one of the 161,000 terminated by Egg last year (not in default), I recently requested a CCA from them (which is now late), but after reading this thread I thought about sending this letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Following a recent review of my finances, I noticed that I was still paying a monthly direct debit to Egg plc to an account that was ended, voluntarily by Egg plc, some 35 days after I received a letter, from Egg, dated 31st January 2008. Since Egg had not served me with a Default Notice under S87(1) of CCA 1974 I conclude that Egg chose to forfeit any liabilities by me to this agreement.

Having studied the CCA 1974 I can find no reference that validates section 20.2 of the agreement’s terms and conditions as the account was not in default.

I must therefore request that you refund my payments made to this account since March 2008 - £1207.54 in total. I must also insist that you cease providing information to credit reference agencies regarding this terminated account.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Yours faithfully

I'd appreciate any comments on the wording.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Folks , been reading for countless hours this entire thread . I have had similar problems which i'm seeking advice as to how to combat please have a peek at my thread if anyone can advise :

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/196118-egg-bryan-carter.html

 

However the reason for the post is that there may be people out there with this EGG problem that should check their credit file immediately as like myself you may have had a DEFAULT NOTICE lodged with the CRA's and not even be aware it exists !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

This is fascinating reading and I'm so glad I've read this thread and hopefully it will be useful.

I was one of the 161,000 terminated by Egg last year (not in default), I recently requested a CCA from them (which is now late), but after reading this thread I thought about sending this letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Following a recent review of my finances, I noticed that I was still paying a monthly direct debit to Egg plc to an account that was ended, voluntarily by Egg plc, some 35 days after I received a letter, from Egg, dated 31st January 2008. Since Egg had not served me with a Default Notice under S87(1) of CCA 1974 I conclude that Egg chose to forfeit any liabilities by me to this agreement.

Having studied the CCA 1974 I can find no reference that validates section 20.2 of the agreement’s terms and conditions as the account was not in default.

I must therefore request that you refund my payments made to this account since March 2008 - £1207.54 in total. I must also insist that you cease providing information to credit reference agencies regarding this terminated account.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Yours faithfully

I'd appreciate any comments on the wording.

 

Thanks in advance

 

I agree with lollipop

Link to post
Share on other sites

That IS a damn good letter.

 

I send something similar but I've already challenged them to show which section (CCA197) permits termination without a default and stopped paying 'cos of the 'approved limit' etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 2 All fellow EGG Lovers

They say PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE !!

This forum exudes confidence to us "minnions" who have stood up to

the BIG BAD EGG and I for one will hopefully be eternally grateful for it.

Having personally headed down this NON-PAYMENT route with

IMMENENT DEFAULT of my " ended " account on the horizon.

I have gathered from here that Egg are in NO HURRY to take anybody

to COURT over their NON-PAYMENT stance with regard to our

" ended " accounts, as an unfavourable decision on their part

will probably collapse their bank.

We all want Egg to force their " hand " which they obviously

are not to keen to do. In my opinion the part reason for this

is that the majority of the 160,ooo are STILL PAYING their DD,

either unaware of this stance, or personal uncertainty of the outcome.

A point I would like to raise is that every week on TV there is a

growing " minor Celebrity " called MARTIN LEWIS who CHAMPIONS the

" Common Mans " fight against BANK CHARGES and injustices.

Would a bombardment of requests from this forums good people to GMTV,

in the hope of raising the profile of our plight to a National audience,

bring the bouncing Mr Lewis to respond on TV.

Could you imagine the reaction if only HALF of the bereft 160,000

were to question their " ended " agreement with EGG !

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're probably trying to reinstate your account, you'll receive a new card in the post shortly!

 

I logged into my account recently just to check how much I'd accidentally paid them since they ended our agreement and it seems my credit limit has increased!

 

You couldn't make it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sold mine on instead of trying to collect it themselves - maybe because they know it is made up of at least 30% charges!

TheKat1979 - Taking Control!

 

Taking on -

Barclaycard via HFO - daft application form sent

Barclays Current Account - at AQ stage - fingers crossed asked for Hardship

Egg - various issues! Are about to default me on a disputed debt!

Bryan Carter CCJ set aside - looks to have been set aside without a trip to court! WOO!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it has been made clear elsewhere on here that most Egg agreements are unenforceable.

 

It seems that if you received the termination letter, that you agreement is without a doubt unenforceable. Well, I say seems, I actually now know this is the case: as do Egg.

 

Challenges should be made to Egg immediately.

Not saying to stop paying in the meantime, or any other action.

 

Just take them to court over enforceability of contract.

 

You will win.

 

There are plenty companies who will also do this on your behalf for a few hundred £. To some this may be worth it. They will win for you and mean that Egg cannot pursue the debt any further (note this is different from writing off the debt, but essentially the same thing).

 

Go for it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What has happened to your big class action, Eddie?

 

The one that we were going to read about in the media?

I didn't say we were going to launch a class action.

We have a group who have stopepd paying and contested that there is no contract in place.

 

Egg have gone very quiet.

We have since found that the majority of Egg's CCAs are unenforceable, and furthermore that Egg know this (Citi did an analysis as part of their due diligence).

 

And yes, our media contact is documenting as we go along.

 

It does appear that the CCA route is the best route as opposed to the contact route. Not necessarily that there is no merit in the contract route. Rather that the CCA route is proven and easier.

 

Hope that answers your questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say we were going to launch a class action.

We have a group who have stopepd paying and contested that there is no contract in place.

 

Egg have gone very quiet.

We have since found that the majority of Egg's CCAs are unenforceable, and furthermore that Egg know this (Citi did an analysis as part of their due diligence).

 

And yes, our media contact is documenting as we go along.

 

It does appear that the CCA route is the best route as opposed to the contact route. Not necessarily that there is no merit in the contract route. Rather that the CCA route is proven and easier.

 

Hope that answers your questions.

 

Thanks for that Eddie, that's very interesting.

 

Did the due diligence show that the loans were unenforceable as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Eddie, that's very interesting.

 

Did the due diligence show that the loans were unenforceable as well?

 

Sorry militant, I don't know the answer to that.

I haven't seen concrete proof about the CCAs, but it is from a reliable source, and seems to be backed-up in the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, but Egg have actd unlawfully. They are not allowed by law to take collection action with out sending a DN and allowing you the chnace torectify the situation.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...