Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey putting old defaulted information back on my Crefit File!!!!


Redmountie999
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5879 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help please!!!!!

 

Several years ago I received a default by one ofthe other high street banks. This default has stayed on my credit file for the past 6 years and was removed in November 2007. I recently applied for a mortgage and overdraft products with my bank Lloyds TSB. Upon application I was turned down and discovered that this was becasue the previous adverse credit history (default) was still showing on their internal system. I immediately contacted Equifax who confirmed that the information was still on there.

 

In November and again in December I complained against Abby National as they incorrectly placed the orignal default marker back on my credit file then. I wrote to the Financial Ombudsman Service to consider my complaint and they upheld it. I subsequently received £200 compensation from the Abbey.

 

This has again happened and Abeey have again apologised and made another offer of £200 compensation. Should I accapt this??????

 

The other problem I have is that Lloyds Tsb are refusing to remove the adverse data they hold against me on their internal system. I have complained to them and they acknowledge that this is an error and say that they have corrected it. Yesterday I rang to increase my overdraft and they refused due to adverse credit data with Equifax. I've checked my credit file and this information is not on there.

 

What can I do about Lloyds refusing to correct the incorrect internal data they hold about me????

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has again happened and Abeey have again apologised and made another offer of £200 compensation. Should I accapt this??????

 

If they agree to remove the default again, I would seriously consider it - you're unlikely to receive more if you go to Court.

 

If they won't remove the default, I would refuse it and pursue them through Court.

 

What can I do about Lloyds refusing to correct the incorrect internal data they hold about me????

 

Which data is this? The fact they've refused your application because of Abbey's default?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah Lloyds are saying that they can't remove the data they hold for me internally (put on by the Abbey) as this is the information shown on my credit file externally. This is incorrect and i've even supplied them with copies of my credit reports to show them it's not on there!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this;

 

 

Date

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: ****

 

Please note this letter is a statutory notice pursuant to s.10 and s.12 Data Protection Act 1998

 

The information relating to external information relating to my credit reference file, linked to the above account. in which I am the data subject is incorrect. Therefore, under Section 10 and Section 12 of the Data Protection Act 1998 I require you to cease processing the data in relation to the external information relating to my credit reference file that is incorrect.

 

This means you must erase or destroy all information regarding external information relating to my credit reference file from your own internal record, as it is causing me damage in the form of a negative effect on my credit rating and on credit decisions being made, internally or externally from Lloyds TSB.

 

Further, as decisions have been taken based on that incorrect information, I will require you to manually revisit those decisions, my entitlement under s.12 DPA, taking in to consideration that the incorrect material facts have been included in previous automated decisions, and that this information has included inaccurate external information relating to my credit reference file.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; which I contend you have not, and that my contention will be substantiated by the production of Prima Facie evidence, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

If you do not cooperate fully with my request you may also view this correspondence as a notice of intention to apply to the Court under section 13 and 14 Data Protection Act 1998 for an order requiring the data controller to erase and destroy, the incorrect data that you hold and continue to process. I also reserve the right to issue proceedings, without further notice, against Lloyds TSB for compensation under section 13 of the aforesaid Act. This claim will be made for breaches of the Third, Fourth and Fifth Principles of the aforesaid Act

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...